Clemson Tigers

DooKSucks · Post by **DooKSucks** » Tue Sep 03, 2013 6:10 pm

Polls conducted less than four to five weeks in the regular season are as useless as nuns at a bachelor party.

innocentbystander · Post by **innocentbystander** » Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:12 pm

DooKSucks wrote:Polls conducted less than four to five weeks in the regular season are as useless as nuns at a bachelor party.

Oh but see, the UVa educated one told me I knew nothing about college football (his words.) Apparently the people creating that poll don't know anything about college football either. I suppose we just have disgruntled UVa grads tell us ALL how we are supposed to think about college football, particularly this early in the season.

dave_rickart · Post by **dave_rickart** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:56 am

no, i said you filter your memory to serve your current argument.

Doesn't BC require you to be able to read before they admit you?

hedge · Post by **hedge** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:25 pm

IB is the biggest bandwagon jumper there is. After one game, he's "calling" for Clemson to win the NC....

KeviNole · Post by **KeviNole** » Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:43 pm

IB is desperate for ANYONE in the ACC (except FSU) to win a MNC to boost the coffers of the dead weight like BC.

The only way either wins it all this year is through a miracle season like AU had a few years ago.

innocentbystander · Post by **innocentbystander** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:20 am

hedge wrote:IB is the biggest bandwagon jumper there is. After one game, he's "calling" for Clemson to win the NC....

If Clemson goes 13-0 (they should now, seeing how mortal South Carolina is) they will win the MNC

Who stops Tahj Boyd? Who? No one that I can see.

dave_rickart · Post by **dave_rickart** » Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:15 pm

I think you meant 14-0

(unless you think they can lose their bowl game and still win the national title somehow...)

innocentbystander · Post by **innocentbystander** » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:44 am

dave_rickart wrote:I think you meant 14-0

(unless you think they can lose their bowl game and still win the national title somehow...)

I didn't think they started the "playoff" this year. Isn't that next year?

hedge · Post by **hedge** » Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:41 am

Why did you put playoff in quotations? Is that your secret term for you circle jerk parties with your boyfriends?

billy bob bocephus · Post by **billy bob bocephus** » Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:29 pm

IB - 12 game season + 1 ACC championship game + 1 MNC game = 14

dave_rickart · Post by **dave_rickart** » Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:21 pm

sad that someone had to spell that out to him....

innocentbystander · Post by **innocentbystander** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:16 am

billy bob bocephus wrote:IB - 12 game season + 1 ACC championship game + 1 MNC game = 14

correct. that is why I said....

me wrote:If Clemson goes 13-0 (they should now, seeing how mortal South Carolina is) they will win the MNC

all they have to do is go 13-0. They do that, they play for the MNC... and they'll win it.... since no one could stop Boyd. Sorry if that was far too complicated for this board to comprehend...

KeviNole · Post by **KeviNole** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:21 am

Boyd is good but he's far from unstoppable. Give him time and he's pretty reliable; get in his face and he's a deer in the headlights.

Unfortunately based on the first two games, FSU won't be able to generate pressure with the front four so we'll have to blitz, so it'll be a challenge to cover Watkins and the rest. Fortunately for us, their second best receiver is out for the season.

aTm · Post by **aTm** » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:28 pm

Does the unstoppable Tajh Boyd even have 500 yards on the season yet?

innocentbystander · Post by **innocentbystander** » Sun Oct 06, 2013 7:11 pm

Okay they are going to kill us on Saturday. But I don't think they cover the 26 points. I think Clemson wins 56 to 38 (something like that.) Clemson will score at will (pretty much every single time they touch the ball) but BC will have possession of the ball for 36 of the 60 minutes, BC will get like 280 yards rushing, and Andre Williams will look awesome in a humbling loss.

KeviNole · Post by **KeviNole** » Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:31 pm

If BC controls the ball that well, no way in hell there are 94 points scored.

innocentbystander · Post by **innocentbystander** » Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:58 pm

KeviNole wrote:If BC controls the ball that well, no way in hell there are 94 points scored.

Sure, why not?

Army had the ball for 36 minutes. There was 75 points scored yesterday and Andre Williams had 263 yards rushing.

When we played you guys, BC had 200 yards rushing and 82 points scored, combined....

Our defense blows Kevinole. We are totally committed this year to getting as many sacks as humanly possible (send eight if we must) and as a result, all we do is give up HUGE plays no matter how many points the offense and Andre Williams scored.

AugustWest · Post by **AugustWest** » Mon Oct 07, 2013 7:48 am

Your offense blows Kevinole? How did they decide on him?

KeviNole · Post by **KeviNole** » Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:20 am

AugustWest wrote:Your offense blows Kevinole? How did they decide on him?

Rettig has a real purty mouth.

KeviNole · Post by **KeviNole** » Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:24 am

If you send 8 at the QB and get shocked when your defense gives up big plays, your DC and HC are morons.

Blitzing might work a few times against Boyd though, he's crazy good when he has time but (like EJ Manuel) looks lost when you get defenders in his face. Winston has been the exact opposite so far, if you blitz him you might get a sack once in a while but you might also get a SportsCenter highlight play. Also, even with a sack, 3rd and 20 is quite makeable with Winston, whereas it was a guaranteed draw play for Manuel.

The Goat Pen

Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers

Re: Clemson Tigers