The Goat Pen

Who'd he murder?

His chance at re-election.

Meh

He murdered Osama Bin Laden.

Correct, mea culpa, the one killed OBL, but is totally blameless in Libya, got it.

"Democratic strategist Paul Begala, asked by CNN's Wolf Blitzer if the Obama campaign has given up on North Carolina, said "Yes."

Obama "carried" NC by 13,000 votes (out of 4.2 million total). It's not like NC was some democratic stronghold. But it doesn't bode well for the repubs that states like Virginia and NC, which they used to be able to bank on, are now at best in the mix for the dems. Maybe not this year for NC (although VA will probably be closer), but the repubs are clearly losing ground in states that were former strongholds...

WTH?

UNC drops term ‘freshman’ in favor of ‘gender inclusive language’

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4458

Romney Wins CBS Focus Group In Ohio

[youtube]6URuvgL2CKA[/youtube]

Romney won the presidential debate by looking presidential. Obama had a painful case of Biden's smile

By Dr. Tim Stanley US politics Last updated: October 23rd, 2012

Romney won the third presidential debate – and how he did it was encapsulated in a single exchange. The candidates were discussing military spending and Romney had just accused Obama of making harmful cutbacks. The President wheeled out what must have seemed like a great, pre-planned zinger: “I think Governor Romney maybe hasn't spent enough time looking at how our military works. You mentioned the navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature of our military's changed.” The audience laughed, Obama laughed, I laughed. It was funny.

But here’s why it was also a vote loser. For a start, Twitter immediately lit up with examples of how the US Army does still use horses and bayonets (horses were used during the invasion of Afghanistan). More importantly, this was one example of many in which the President insulted, patronised and mocked his opponent rather than put across a constructive argument. His performance was rude and unpresidential. Obama seemed to have a touch of the Bidens, wriggling about in his chair, waving his hands dismissively and always – always – smirking in Romney’s direction. By contrast, Romney sucked up the abuse and retained a rigid poker face all night. He looked like a Commander in Chief; Obama looked like a lawyer. Who would you rather vote for?
Aside from the horses and bayonets moment, this was essentially a debate without incident. Part of the fault was the format. It’s interesting to note that Romney won the first debate while standing up and Obama did better in the second when walking around. But when both men were forced to sit for 90 minutes, the energy was inevitably reduced and neither broke through the fourth wall convincingly. Romney had a slight edge because he didn’t use his hands so much: Obama blew his closing statements by developing ultra-energetic conjurer’s hands (“Look at the hands, not at the cards, look at the hands…”)
But the bigger problem was that they agreed on the essentials, which were all about foreign policy. Romney refused to tackle Obama directly on Libya (I shouted at the TV that he should, but he just wouldn’t listen) and Fast and Furious seems to have been forgotten by the GOP. In everything else, Obama has become so homicidally neoconservative and Romney so desperately peaceful that they’ve met in the middle on most issues. Both would defend Israel in the event of an attack, both want out of Afghanistan in 2014 and neither would let Iran get the bomb. If you want a real debate on foreign policy, you’re just going to have to wait until Rand Paul gets the nomination in 2020. At times this felt almost as boring as that Gingrich v Huntsman debate that I and about 4 other people watched during the primaries. Romney tried his darnedest to bring everything back to the economy and Obama seemed to say in every answer, “So what we need to do in the Middle East is talk more about how rubbish my opponent is.” It’s almost lucky that Obama isn’t running unopposed in this election because then he’d have nothing to run on at all.
Where a disagreement did exist was on the question of leadership; Romney wants to be proactive and Obama pledges to remain reactive. Nevertheless, both seem committed to nation building overseas – with Obama throwing in the caveat that he’d like to do some nation building at home, too. The real difference was in style. In his closing statement – after Obama was done making the Ace of Spades disappear – Romney channelled Reagan by looking straight into the camera and asserting his faith in America. It was empty, sugary stuff that will make liberals sick. But it was infinitely preferable to Obama’s constant, nasty attacks. Sometimes in life, the nice guys do win.
We also have to judge this debate as part of the narrative arc of this season. Romney won the first debate by a mile. Because Romney’s win was so decisive, it sparked an image change: Americans started to think of him as presidential material. That’s why Obama winning the second debate by an inch made little impact – people were watching Romney not to see him land punches but to see how well he could take them. He won the third debate because, by the end of the night, his and Obama’s positions in the narrative arc had switched. Romney now looks like the President and Obama looks like the challenger.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timst ... ens-smile/

Heh...

Trumped-Up Charges? Republicans Rejected Man’s Claims That Obama Sold Cocaine In College

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2 ... ans-reject

Heh...

Piedmont High School students involved in ‘Fantasy Slut League’

http://blog.sfgate.com/stew/2012/10/22/ ... ut-league/

It looked me like Romney went mellow last night in order to appeal to female voters in swing state suburbs.

You can't blame Stafford that his RB's keep fumbling the ball in the red stone and his receivers can't catch the ball anywhere.

Romney's gaffes are no more ridiculous than Obama's gaffes. And they are totally dwarfed by Biden's gaffes.

Has anybody ever seen SF Giants pitcher Tim Lincicum:
[img]
http://alt.coxnewsweb.com/cnishared/too ... 772_24.jpg[/img]

And "Dazed and Confused" pitcher Mitch Kramer:
[img]
http://www.thefastertimes.com/sportscha ... iggins.jpg[/img]

In the same room at the same time? A coincidence? I think not.

puter mentioned perennial FOX News guest Krautheimer the other day and I sassed him (Krautheimer). But I just saw him on O'Reilly's show and he was pretty good. Refused to be bullied by O'Reilly and it even seemed he cowed O'Reilly. Seems like a pretty reasonable dude. But he still looks like a dork...

Now Dick Morris is on. Dear god, talk about the fat kid who got whipped daily who is now getting his revenge against the world. What a pudgy cheek little fatty loser this guy is...

hedge wrote:Now Dick Morris is on. Dear god, talk about the fat kid who got whipped daily who is now getting his revenge against the world. What a pudgy cheek little fatty loser this guy is...

lol, Dick Morris is one of the biggest hacks on the network. O'Reilly and Hannity love the guy. He was predicting a McCain victory to the bitter end

Interesting website for statistics on early voting. Nearly a million have already voted in Ohio, with Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) and Franklin County (Columbus) having the most votes cast by far

http://elections.gmu.edu/early_vote_2012.html

Dr. Strangelove wrote:Interesting website for statistics on early voting. Nearly a million have already voted in Ohio, with Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) and Franklin County (Columbus) having the most votes cast by far

http://elections.gmu.edu/early_vote_2012.html

And that is the dirty little secret in the election.

BHO wins 53% of the popular vote and gets 321 in the EC.

After the GOP cries robbery, pollsters admit to undercounting minorities and voters under the age of 35.