The Goat Pen

Now do you realize why you are poor?

Holy shit, after reading, $4M is not enough...

http://t.co/Wx3Dl4PI3F

I'd gladly spend 4 days in a cell without food and water if somebody paid me $4 million. Hell, I'd do it for $10,000...

The medical impact was too dangerous for me to agree with that shit.

On another note...here's some interesting shit on economic mobility, based on region:

http://t.co/VSlCFy6DdU

hedge wrote:I'd gladly spend 4 days in a cell without food and water if somebody paid me $4 million. Hell, I'd do it for $10,000...

Didn't you already? Although you only earned 39 cents a day.

I've gone thru withdrawals longer than 4 days without food or water. I'm sure you have, too...

Nah, Rat always knows where he can score fresh cock.

(Cheap and easy shot I know but it had to be said damn it!!)

I like it how you always answer the door when I knock.

[youtube]sgAjzlwClBw[/youtube]

After about 20 seconds I couldn't stand watching the frog face anymore. She used to be pretty good looking. She needs to sue her plastic surgeon.

http://m.theatlanticwire.com/national/2 ... hes/67864/

Not sure if its true or not but if it is, oh boy.

sardis wrote:After about 20 seconds I couldn't stand watching the frog face anymore. She used to be pretty good looking. She needs to sue her plastic surgeon.

Most celebs do, except for Halle Berry.

gotta disagree, that's a hatchet job that's worse than the rest... or most probably a number of minor hatchet jobs accumulated

to each his own...



(now, don't get me wrong, I think she's batshit crazy and would never go out of my way to date her, if I had the chance, but she is not suffering from a hatchet job)

i meant chenowith, she looks like an alien

hedge wrote:I'd gladly spend 4 days in a cell without food and water if somebody paid me $4 million. Hell, I'd do it for $10,000...

4 days in a cell without food? No problem. You and I could go without food for a month or more.

4 days in a cell without water? That might put your life in jeapordy. You say you'd do it for $10,000. Just beginning day 2, you wouldn't even believe how horrible you would feel (as I have done this, no food or water for 24 hours to try and "make weight" for an AFROTC scholarship.) On day 3, you'd be so thirsty (and if you listend to your body, it would tell you that thirst was the least of its immediate problems) that you'd gladly give back $5,000 of that $10,000 for a single glass of water and that would be the best tasting glass of water you've ever had in your life. Lets assume you didn't have it. Beginning day 4 (just 73 hours into your 96 hour jail sentence), you might be passing out in your cell. You might not make it.

hedge wrote:I've gone thru withdrawals longer than 4 days without food or water.

Then you are not human.

Bklyn wrote:to each his own...



(now, don't get me wrong, I think she's batshit crazy and would never go out of my way to date her, if I had the chance, but she is not suffering from a hatchet job)

i think she's gorgeous

if you ever wondered how the guy with the marijuana in his trunk always has the worst luck......

A secretive U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.

Although these cases rarely involve national security issues, documents reviewed by Reuters show that law enforcement agents have been directed to conceal how such investigations truly begin - not only from defense lawyers but also sometimes from prosecutors and judges.

The undated documents show that federal agents are trained to "recreate" the investigative trail to effectively cover up where the information originated, a practice that some experts say violates a defendant's Constitutional right to a fair trial. If defendants don't know how an investigation began, they cannot know to ask to review potential sources of exculpatory evidence - information that could reveal entrapment, mistakes or biased witnesses.

"I have never heard of anything like this at all," said Nancy Gertner, a Harvard Law School professor who served as a federal judge from 1994 to 2011. Gertner and other legal experts said the program sounds more troubling than recent disclosures that the National Security Agency has been collecting domestic phone records. The NSA effort is geared toward stopping terrorists; the DEA program targets common criminals, primarily drug dealers.

"It is one thing to create special rules for national security," Gertner said. "Ordinary crime is entirely different. It sounds like they are phonying up investigations."

A government unchecked will continue to take as much power as you are willing to let it have. It does not matter the party.

I would be OK with assassinating everybody that works for the DEA...