Page 460 of 467

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri May 17, 2024 1:06 am
by hedge
I'm sure you've gotten that a lot in your life...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri May 17, 2024 1:06 pm
by Jungle Rat
A

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri May 17, 2024 5:13 pm
by Jungle Rat

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Wed May 22, 2024 8:45 am
by eCat

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Thu May 23, 2024 9:04 pm
by Tree

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Thu May 23, 2024 9:04 pm
by Tree

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 10:56 am
by innocentbystander
August


Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri May 24, 2024 11:52 am
by eCat
there are few better roles than Quint


Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 6:08 pm
by eCat
too funny


Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2024 9:48 am
by innocentbystander
Fucking glorious!



I want to go back in time. Right now.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2024 10:58 am
by innocentbystander
And maybe... even better.


Willy Wonka wrote:We are the music makers. And we are the dreamers of the dreams.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 5:08 pm
by sardis
Farrah is still the GOAT. Loved that braless decade.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Mon Jun 03, 2024 8:30 pm
by innocentbystander
sardis wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2024 5:08 pm Farrah is still the GOAT.
Logan's Run

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 9:09 pm
by aTm
I dunno if anything can top Tiger King, but theres a show in similar vein on Max called Ren Faire which might be interesting, even for those of you who havent been to the Texas Renaissance Festival

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2024 4:17 pm
by Jungle Rat

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 8:24 am
by innocentbystander
80 years ago today



Make sure to tell any Krout you know to go fuck himself

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2024 9:10 am
by Jungle Rat
Wish you were there.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2024 12:20 am
by Tree

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2024 11:03 am
by sardis
I wonder what it would have been like if we didn't get involved in WWI and WW2. We would probably be still ok because of geography. Our population would be higher. We'd have the resources to be self-sufficient. I know it's not popular to question our involvement, but since WW2 vets are mostly gone, but I'm guessing someone has run scenarios. I sometimes wonder if our country would be better off isolationists.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2024 11:24 am
by aTm
There's no isolationism that keeps us out of World War 2. War between Japan and the United States was inevitable in the Pacific. Germany declared war on us. The only thing isolationism would have done is that we wouldn't have been prepared when the war did start for us (we were isolationist politically prior to Pearl Harbor, however the government pretty much knew we would eventually be fighting, if we had stuck our heads in the sand the outcome would have been worse for us.

Not getting involved in World War 1 is more debatable. We were only nominally isolationist in that war as well, as we were heavily financially linked to the Entente powers. It is very difficult to say what would have happened in the aftermath of WW1 without the US involved, even on the eventual outcome of the war.