Page 415 of 1658
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:25 pm
by Jungle Rat
innocentbystander wrote:Jungle Rat wrote:innocentbystander wrote:I think Creighton is a hell of a lot better than 11th in the country. I got a chance to see them play for a few minutes over the long weekend. They are fucking good. I could very easily see them winning 25 regular season games.
Why are you so fucking stupid? Honestly?
Why are you so fucking lazy? Honestly?
It is
easy to say, North Carolina, Duke, UConn, Kentucky, Nova, Indiana, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Arizona, UCLA, Purdue, Pitt, Syracuse, and Georgetown. The usual suspects as to the perinial basketball powerhouses are the usual suspects. End of story. It is no fun to to say one of them is the team to watch because of the 300+ teams, we are all already watching all of them.
Rat, grow a pair of testicles, go out on a limb, pick a mid-major and say "....you know what, that team is GOOD!" That is fun. It is fun and interesting because it is hard to do. It is much harder (and riskier) to go out on a limb and say that a mid-major team might make some noise than it is to to follow a perinial powerhouse.
Look at Butler. Think about how much fun Butler fans (and to lesser extent, VCU fans) have had in recent years. March is a great time if you go to Butler. Think about how much fun it would have been to follow that team from the beginning of the season and to come here to the Goat Pen,
gloat, and say "....I think that team is really fucking good and might win it all."
Grow some stones Rat. Challenge people to think. I can't root for BC, we just lost to Bryant, we suck. So now I have to find someone else to root for. I think Creighton is good. They have already beaten 3 of the toughest 6 opponents they have on their schedule. If they lose to the other 3 good teams (but win the rest) they go 26-3.
Now, I get to have fun. I get to throw it all in your faces for the next three months if Creighton continues to win.
I know its not PC to laugh at retards but this is an exception.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:32 pm
by innocentbystander
Jungle Rat wrote:innocentbystander wrote:Why are you so fucking lazy? Honestly?
It is easy to say, North Carolina, Duke, UConn, Kentucky, Nova, Indiana, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Arizona, UCLA, Purdue, Pitt, Syracuse, and Georgetown. The usual suspects as to the perinial basketball powerhouses are the usual suspects. End of story. It is no fun to to say one of them is the team to watch because of the 300+ teams, we are all already watching all of them.
Rat, grow a pair of testicles, go out on a limb, pick a mid-major and say "....you know what, that team is GOOD!" That is fun. It is fun and interesting because it is hard to do. It is much harder (and riskier) to go out on a limb and say that a mid-major team might make some noise than it is to to follow a perinial powerhouse.
Look at Butler. Think about how much fun Butler fans (and to lesser extent, VCU fans) have had in recent years. March is a great time if you go to Butler. Think about how much fun it would have been to follow that team from the beginning of the season and to come here to the Goat Pen, gloat, and say "....I think that team is really fucking good and might win it all."
Grow some stones Rat. Challenge people to think. I can't root for BC, we just lost to Bryant, we suck. So now I have to find someone else to root for. I think Creighton is good. They have already beaten 3 of the toughest 6 opponents they have on their schedule. If they lose to the other 3 good teams (but win the rest) they go 26-3. Now, I get to have fun. I get to throw it all in your faces for the next three months if Creighton continues to win.
I know its not PC to laugh at retards but this is an exception.
You do whatever you want. I'll root for Creighton.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:35 pm
by Jungle Rat
You do that dumbass. I'm still gonna be laughing at you though.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:51 pm
by eCat
This exact same thing happened to me
it immediately ended any desire I had to ever play football again
[youtube]rLmdHknLHMU[/youtube]
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:20 pm
by BigRedMan
LMAO that kid gets destroyed.
Hope he said something to this effect. "I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!!"
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:37 pm
by Bklyn
We have weight limits for our Pee Wee leagues. No way that kid would be able to play in that bracket. Feed the kid soup and salad or put him on the division with 14 years olders.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:43 pm
by AlabamAlum
Big kids aren't allowed to play off the line down here.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:27 am
by AlabamAlum
Watch the video on what the NCAA did with the two Indiana freshmen. Ridiculous....the NCAA needs to be disbanded.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketb ... ter-jurkin
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:33 am
by eCat
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:32 am
by BigRedMan
Agreed. 185.00 donation 20 years ago makes him a booster???? LMAO.
On the other hand though, it is nice to see that the NCAA has cleared up all the other issues in college athletics and had time to focus on this issue. Clean running programs and student athletes are what I think of when I think of the NCAA now.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:39 am
by eCat
anyone named Peter Jurkin needs to play and have his named mentioned 1000 times a game
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:05 pm
by BigRedMan
I am fearful of the game this evening. Tarheels by 15. Going to be rough watching them run up and down the court against IU.
Bet the house folks.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:07 pm
by eCat
BigRedMan wrote:I am fearful of the game this evening. Tarheels by 15. Going to be rough watching them run up and down the court against IU.
Bet the house folks.
by 15? IU wins by 7+
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:22 pm
by Jungle Rat
I think BRM is doing his AA impression.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:23 pm
by Cats rule
i might be outraged if it were any program other than iu (although i doubt it; that aau guy's shady as hell)....fock 'em....and the thought that it has to be particularly galling to the bums to see shabazz already suiting up for ucla is pleasing to me
i do agree however, that after they get done jerking jurkin around they need to go the way of the dodo
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:41 pm
by BigRedMan
Cats rule wrote:
i might be outraged if it were any program other than iu (although i doubt it; that aau guy's shady as hell)....fock 'em....and the thought that it has to be particularly galling to the bums to see shabazz already suiting up for ucla is pleasing to me
i do agree however, that after they get done jerking jurkin around they need to go the way of the dodo
Be afraid son. Be afraid of the ban hammer.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:45 pm
by hedge
Hairston is out tonight, we weren't going to win anyway, but if he had gotten hot from outside, it might not have been too bad. Now it's going to be ugly...
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:36 pm
by hedge
I'm slightly concerned that Hairston didn't make the trip. OK, so you sprung your ankle (or whatever), but don't even dress in street clothes and sit on the bench? You don't even make the trip? Hmmmmm....
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:47 pm
by BigRedMan
Pesky tarheels staying around.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:55 pm
by goldenbear
Johnson reminds me so much of Jamison