Page 35 of 63

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:42 pm
by Jungle Rat
hedge wrote:Fedora needs to be shot...
Many have said the same about you yet you're still here. Pussies.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:53 pm
by hedge
I've never fucked up as bad as Fedora did last night. That you know of...

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:11 pm
by Jungle Rat
Your MIF says different. At least per her emails to me.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 12:32 pm
by DooKSucks
Some drunken skank in Vegas has hijacked the computers for most of the bookmakers and has UNC at -9 versus BC. UNC can't stop the run and BC has a decent running back. Bet your life savings on BC.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:27 pm
by KeviNole
UNC also has a decent passing game and BC's pass defense isn't very good. I agree that -9 seems very high, way too much credit given for beating an average Miami team.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:30 am
by DooKSucks
Beating? Ha

If FSU doesn't win by 20 against Miami, I will be shocked.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 6:32 am
by KeviNole
We should destroy Miami but there are a lot of factors outside of straight football that fall in their favor. And they do have athletes. We'll see...

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:47 pm
by innocentbystander
DooKSucks wrote:Some drunken skank in Vegas has hijacked the computers for most of the bookmakers and has UNC at -9 versus BC. UNC can't stop the run and BC has a decent running back. Bet your life savings on BC.
Apparently, Jason is not the only sandbagger at the Goat Pen.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:48 pm
by innocentbystander
KeviNole wrote:We should destroy Miami but there are a lot of factors outside of straight football that fall in their favor. And they do have athletes. We'll see...
In your opinion, of all of FSU's victories, which opponent was the most troublesome?

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:07 pm
by Jungle Rat
Damn, we need more bug spray here at TGP. Someone needs to figure out how to kill these Stink Bugs.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:28 pm
by KeviNole
innocentbystander wrote:
KeviNole wrote:We should destroy Miami but there are a lot of factors outside of straight football that fall in their favor. And they do have athletes. We'll see...
In your opinion, of all of FSU's victories, which opponent was the most troublesome?
Obviously you want some praise for BC here....and they had a good game plan against us. We couldn't get in a rhythm in the first quarter and BC mixed up the pass and run very well. But we ran off a 35-3 streak that put the game out of reach and after the first quarter I was confident we would win.

The reality is we haven't had any real trouble with any of our opponents. Yet.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:46 am
by innocentbystander
Alright Hedge, DS, I think our game tomorrow will be a pretty close game (1 TD either way). The way I look at it...

...if you stop Andre Williams, you win

...if you do not stop Andre Williams, you lose

BC doesn't really have much control of the outcome here so much as the victory will be predicated on UNC's ability to take Williams out of the game.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:16 pm
by dave_rickart
that would require tackling on behalf of the Heel defense...

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:49 pm
by innocentbystander
dave_rickart wrote:that would require tackling on behalf of the Heel defense...

well, We can't help them there

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:40 pm
by DooKSucks
innocentbystander wrote:Alright Hedge, DS, I think our game tomorrow will be a pretty close game (1 TD either way). The way I look at it...

...if you stop Andre Williams, you win

...if you do not stop Andre Williams, you lose

BC doesn't really have much control of the outcome here so much as the victory will be predicated on UNC's ability to take Williams out of the game.
Well, you were completely wrong yet again.

Dear God. BC was awful. UNC sucks but not that damn bad.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2013 11:26 pm
by innocentbystander
DooKSucks wrote:
innocentbystander wrote:Alright Hedge, DS, I think our game tomorrow will be a pretty close game (1 TD either way). The way I look at it...

...if you stop Andre Williams, you win

...if you do not stop Andre Williams, you lose

BC doesn't really have much control of the outcome here so much as the victory will be predicated on UNC's ability to take Williams out of the game.
Well, you were completely wrong yet again.

Dear God. BC was awful. UNC sucks but not that damn bad.
BC sucks. Real bad.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:41 am
by DooKSucks
UNC has a defense that made Logan Thomas look competent, but BC couldn't even throw for 100 yards with receivers open....

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:56 am
by innocentbystander
DooKSucks wrote:UNC has a defense that made Logan Thomas look competent, but BC couldn't even throw for 100 yards with receivers open....
Yeah we suck.

Our receivers are 1-AA receivers. They suck. And they weren't "open". And Rettig sucked. Only Andre Williams played well. Our defense sucks. The only way we stop a passing play is sacking the QB. Otherwise, we suck. Our defensive backs are all 1AA

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:22 pm
by DooKSucks
Jeez. Vegas has UNC at -3 against State. The bookies must have had one hellacious night last night. There is no other way to explain that line. State has good running backs and isn't composed of FCS talent at qb and the secondary like BC.

Re: North Carolina Tar Heels

Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 4:19 pm
by hedge
We'll continue where FSU left off...