Florida State Seminoles

Bklyn · Post by **Bklyn** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:48 pm

Well, at least she won't break the bank on food for him. I think Jimmie Walker hit that stick ass, though. That has to hurt everyone's feelings...even those who hate her.

hedge · Post by **hedge** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:57 pm

She is heinous...

AugustWest · Post by **AugustWest** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:23 pm

you know his perverse ass surfs porn more than anyone else on this board,

no he doesn't.

innocentbystander · Post by **innocentbystander** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:41 pm

eCat wrote:yes, Ann Coulter is the person I listen to in shaping my beliefs.

no one allows their beliefs to be shaped by Ann Coulter.

I quote her NOT because she has shaped my beliefs. Instead, it is because Ann does a brilliant job WRITING why I believe what I believe. She puts into words what I am already thinking far better than I ever could. Her thoughts on Rick Santorum matched my thoughts.

hedge · Post by **hedge** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:16 pm

If you can't put your thoughts into words, they're not thoughts, they're just a bunch of garble. Which sounds about right for you...

Owlman · Post by **Owlman** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:35 pm

It's been entertaining

billy bob bocephus · Post by **billy bob bocephus** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:19 pm

It starts by repealing the 26th Amendment.

and the 27th

whoops, that should be the 16th and 17th

Saint · Post by **Saint** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:46 pm

damn, she should change her name to Man Coulter

DooKSucks · Post by **DooKSucks** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:27 pm

I used to hook up with a girl in Columbia with the last name Coulter. I asked her if she was related "to that cunt, Ann Coulter." She was her cousin...

She wasn't offended, even though the girl was very conservative. The girl said old Ann is a royal bitch all of the time.

Jungle Rat · Post by **Jungle Rat** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:29 pm

Imagine that. Her cousin.

Bklyn · Post by **Bklyn** » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:53 pm

I can't believe Ann believes 30% of what she spouts. She just can't, but it's too lucrative for her, in this incarnation, to talk more sane.

S.E. Cupp seemed to be headed that same way, then she started getting an MSNBC check...then her rhetoric miraculously became sensible. It is still Conservative, but it is sensible. She won't make Coulter money as a result, but I hope she sleeps better than her.

aTm · Post by **aTm** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 12:49 am

I used to hook up with a girl in Columbia with the last name Coulter.

You could have stopped there and we would have filled in the rest accurately.

crashcourse · Post by **crashcourse** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:57 am

aTm wrote:
I used to hook up with a girl in Columbia with the last name Coulter.
You could have stopped there and we would have filled in the rest accurately.

do adam's apples run in the family DS?

DooKSucks · Post by **DooKSucks** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:48 pm

No, but she had an insulin pump but was normal sized. Weird

sardis · Post by **sardis** » Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:35 am

A graph simplistically explaining the budget effect of the "fiscal cliff":

http://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.co ... -chart.pdf

So, Oprama is willing to allow the poor and middle class to go over the cliff for a lousy $42 billion from the wealthy? If you are one of the wealthy, you say, ok go ahead.

hedge · Post by **hedge** » Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:52 am

If you're that wealthy, why not say "ok, we'll cough up a lousy $42 bil"? If the figure is as lousy as you claim, what's the problem?

sardis · Post by **sardis** » Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:57 am

Because, right now, there is no way the wealthy are avoiding higher tax rates under any scenario anyway, so you might as well see budget savings from other areas kick in.

Bklyn · Post by **Bklyn** » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:26 am

sardis, you won't win the argument with that type of rationalization (The President harming poor and middle class in order to sock it to the wealthy). No one will see it that way...and I don't believe we go to January 1 without a deal, anyway. Boehner has signaled as much with his removal of Tea Partiers from Congressional Committees. Now, it just seems that the issues come down to rate raising versus code changing with regard to deductions and the amount (800Bn versus 1.6Tn). I think rates vs deductions are 50/50, but the revenue dollar amount winds up being a bit over 1Tn.

hedge · Post by **hedge** » Thu Dec 06, 2012 10:34 am

Need to cut defense by about $250 billion...

The Goat Pen

Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Re: Florida State Seminoles