The Goat Pen

innocentbystander wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 5:03 pm

hedge wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:06 pm I wish you would get the fuck out of life...

I add value and content here. My response about the Supreme Court ruling was a PhD level analysis in its precise expertise. Have you ever contributed anything on this forum to that level?

Your value is equivalent to that of the tabloids that talk of alien invasions in the super market checkout line, and it's obvious you have never read a scholarly piece written by a PhD in your life if you think your drivel compares to quality scholarship.

DooKSucks wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 9:03 pm

innocentbystander wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 5:03 pm

hedge wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:06 pm I wish you would get the fuck out of life...

I add value and content here. My response about the Supreme Court ruling was a PhD level analysis in its precise expertise. Have you ever contributed anything on this forum to that level?

Your value is equivalent to that of the tabloids that talk of alien invasions in the super market checkout line, and it's obvious you have never read a scholarly piece written by a PhD in your life if you think your drivel compares to quality scholarship.

Well I can contribute the fact that we both know that you should be ASHAMED of what you do for a living. And yet you continue because you are shameless.

Practice another form of law.

Nothing I said about Chevron and the decision was in dispute. You didn't dispute it. If you have a dispute you would have mentioned it. Instead you attacked me personally because I hurt your pride.

Jacinto, Nazi Vampire Hunter

But Ohio has.... Cincinnati Chili four-ways?

That’s not chili.

once you realize that, its pretty good

This is a great illustration of how Ric Flair excelled at physical comedy. It was common knowledge that the nature boy was heavy into blow, which makes me wonder if maybe Michael Richards was micro-dosing some Peruvian marching powder as well on the set of Seinfeld.

Nobody microdoses blow...

I wish you’d microdose cyanide.

I wish you'd macrodose it...

I can just watch this on a loop



that might be my new ring tone

DooKSucks wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 9:03 pm

innocentbystander wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 5:03 pm

hedge wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:06 pm I wish you would get the fuck out of life...

I add value and content here. My response about the Supreme Court ruling was a PhD level analysis in its precise expertise. Have you ever contributed anything on this forum to that level?

Your value is equivalent to that of the tabloids that talk of alien invasions in the super market checkout line, and it's obvious you have never read a scholarly piece written by a PhD in your life if you think your drivel compares to quality scholarship.

to be honest, that's kinda what we're looking for

I feel for this woman, I really do, but I lost it when the guy did a Katt Williams impression "is this a prank?"

Looks like Tuesday at WalMart to me…

not to sound like one of those old Boomers who do nothing but dog younger generations but I could never imagine seeing that at Walmart in 1982

That wouldn't have happened in 1982 because people didn't behave like that in 1982. If you had that level of entitlement in 1982, you would not have gone to Walmart. Nowadays (with all of retail shutting down and everyone being broke) you buy everything from Amazon or Walmart.

And even if it did happen in 1982, unlikely you or I would have heard about it because there was no platform for any of us to view this.

eCat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:22 am

DooKSucks wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 9:03 pm

innocentbystander wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 5:03 pm

I add value and content here. My response about the Supreme Court ruling was a PhD level analysis in its precise expertise. Have you ever contributed anything on this forum to that level?

Your value is equivalent to that of the tabloids that talk of alien invasions in the super market checkout line, and it's obvious you have never read a scholarly piece written by a PhD in your life if you think your drivel compares to quality scholarship.

to be honest, that's kinda what we're looking for

i think that DS quite often forgets that a "scholarly piece" written by a PhD might include the PhD telling me that there are more than 2 genders. In that case, that type of thinking IS the belief in alien invasions and the PhD needs to be put into an insane asylum instead of given $283,000/year to teach 3 classes a semester. The "quality scholarship" we hear from many PhDs nowadays, these people could provide absolutely NOTHING in the private sector where results are demanded.

"And even if it did happen in 1982, unlikely you or I would have heard about it because there was no platform for any of us to view this."

Wow, nothing get by you, does it?

hedge wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 2:26 pm "And even if it did happen in 1982, unlikely you or I would have heard about it because there was no platform for any of us to view this."

Wow, nothing get by you, does it?

getS by me, and no, no it doesn't