Damn son…I wear a 7 5/8 or 7 3/4, and I always had the biggest head of anyone I ran with…
Bless your mama’s heart…
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:51 am
by DooKSucks
I was 24" long, 10lb 8oz and my mother gave birth to me the traditional way. She later said she wished she had undergone a c-section. She was/is a bit of a pill. Maybe she's still pissed at me due to the pain from giving birth...
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:54 am
by DooKSucks
eCat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2023 2:47 pm
I'm not sure I've ever seen a size 8.
That's like Shaq shoes for the head
If you go to a hat specific store like Lids or order online, you can find them.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 10:14 am
by eCat
DooKSucks wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:51 am
I was 24" long, 10lb 8oz and my mother gave birth to me the traditional way. She later said she wished she had undergone a c-section. She was/is a bit of a pill. Maybe she's still pissed at me due to the pain from giving birth...
there is an old joke about an old man slapping his son once a month calling him a big headed son of a bitch
DooKSucks wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 9:51 am
I was 24" long, 10lb 8oz and my mother gave birth to me the traditional way. She later said she wished she had undergone a c-section. She was/is a bit of a pill. Maybe she's still pissed at me due to the pain from giving birth...
there is an old joke about an old man slapping his son once a month calling him a big headed son of a bitch
My father could be one ill-assed old cuss, and after I was left to deal with that woman without him acting as a buffer and moderating her insanity, I learned why he was so damned ill and angry for a long time lol
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2023 8:53 pm
by Tree
Sick of Amazon asking if I want to subscribe every time I buy something. Really I'm going to subscribe for a new penis pump every month?
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2023 3:36 pm
by Tree
[media] [/media]
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2023 4:27 pm
by hedge
300% mortality rate? That is astonishing...
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2023 5:17 pm
by Jungle Rat
Do the math.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2023 5:38 pm
by hedge
Math is not an exact science...
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2023 10:08 am
by eCat
Jerry Clower explains how math is overrated
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2023 10:27 am
by Jungle Rat
Is not
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 9:22 pm
by Tree
My new job sucks. I gotta start doing more drugs.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 9:31 pm
by eCat
you guys were talking about AI awhile back
this week is the final week of the program where I train college kids to use our software. One software is a "low code" interface which means you can design how you want it to look and it writes the code behind the scenes.
there is nothing particularly noteworthy about the software, its what he did with it however, this 24 year old wrote an interface to connect to ChatGBT, then worked with ChatGBT to fine tune our thermal simulations, so he demo's the interface yesterday where a supervisor with no computer experience can see a design flaw in a metal fabrication, and instead of submitting it to the engineering department thru a rigorous change request, he just inputs the issue on the interface and behind the scenes, ChatGPT evaluates the design flaw and offers solutions on how to fix it, for example adding a 5mm heat sink to an assembly, which the non-engineer, non computer supervisor then selects whatever solution is within tolerances and submits it to the design department.
Assuming you trust ChatGPT's calculus, the kid just eliminated four $160K a year jobs with about 2 days of configuration work.
Next year every kid in the program will be using AI to drive their simulations.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2023 9:37 pm
by Tree
Sounds like I'm not the only one who will need more drugs.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2023 8:07 am
by Jungle Rat
Tree must have needed attention last night.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 11:04 am
by DooKSucks
eCat wrote: ↑Thu Oct 19, 2023 9:31 pm
you guys were talking about AI awhile back
this week is the final week of the program where I train college kids to use our software. One software is a "low code" interface which means you can design how you want it to look and it writes the code behind the scenes.
there is nothing particularly noteworthy about the software, its what he did with it however, this 24 year old wrote an interface to connect to ChatGBT, then worked with ChatGBT to fine tune our thermal simulations, so he demo's the interface yesterday where a supervisor with no computer experience can see a design flaw in a metal fabrication, and instead of submitting it to the engineering department thru a rigorous change request, he just inputs the issue on the interface and behind the scenes, ChatGPT evaluates the design flaw and offers solutions on how to fix it, for example adding a 5mm heat sink to an assembly, which the non-engineer, non computer supervisor then selects whatever solution is within tolerances and submits it to the design department.
Assuming you trust ChatGPT's calculus, the kid just eliminated four $160K a year jobs with about 2 days of configuration work.
Next year every kid in the program will be using AI to drive their simulations.
AI and outsourcing are about to take over the legal field, especially in transactional stuff and with support staff. Attorney's who don't know how to adapt will get eaten alive by useless overhead, and when state bars deregulate to allow private equity to own interest in law firms, the game will really be over....
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 3:20 pm
by Dave23
Cue IB in 3, 2, 1…
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 3:51 pm
by hedge
AI is clearly a product of feminism...
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 3:52 pm
by innocentbystander
We are in the information age.
In the information age, the more "well formed" the job is, the easier it is to automate said job out of existence. That is a product of the information age. The higher your IQ, the less "well formed" you need your job to be in order to do it. Those with the highest IQ will make the most money. It is not a coincidence that Mark Zuckerberg is worth north of $100,000,000,000. He has an IQ over 150. He was too smart for Harvard University. 100 years ago (industrial age), all those IQ points wouldn't have mattered nearly as much.