College Hoops, Disrespection, and More
https://goatpen.net/forums/
This is ridiculous. Last night, Willard Mitt extended his lead over Santorum.Professor Tiger wrote:Romney mostly wins:Code: Select all
Romney: I'm winning all the "kind of important states"
1. In the northeastern states, where they are fond of liberals and where he'll never win in November.
2. Out west, where there are a lot of Mormons.
3. Where the conservative vote is split between Santorum and Gingrich (OH, MI).
Romney should beg and plead Gingrich to stay in, keep splitting the conservative vote, and thereby ensure a Romney nomination. Or Romney should pay Adelson to continue funding Gingrich for the same reason.
Vermonter, for the most part are honest.puterbac wrote:Gee what a shocker...
EXCLUSIVE: O'KEEFE VIDEO EXPOSES VOTER FRAUD-FRIENDLY POLICIES IN VERMONT
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... %20Vermont
The video, a sequel to O'Keefe's "Primary of the Living Dead" in New Hampshire, shows a Veritas agent entering various voting places around the state of Vermont, giving a different name each time. Each time, he is given a ballot without showing an ID, to his disbelief.
In the video, the agent repeatedly requests (but does not take) a Republican primary ballot. As he explained to Breitbart.com: "We wanted to remind viewers this is not a partisan issue. This is a situation wherein anyone -- Republican or Democrat -- can exploit the system."
The new video follows in the wake of a highly-politicized media attack on Mr. O’Keefe after his exposure of voter fraud in New Hampshire. Those videos resulted in calls from the left for O’Keefe’s arrest. However, the videos soon resulted in the New Hampshire State Senate passing a new bill requiring voter ID.
O'Keefe's new video from Vermont could not be more timely, coming the day after the U.S. Department of Justice's civil rights division blocked a Texas photo ID requirement for voters--to the applause of the American Civil Liberties Union, which claimed that the law was “discriminatory” against “Latinos, African-Americans, elderly citizens, and others.”
As the Project Veritas video shows, the current system in Vermont discriminates against actual legal voters, who must face the prospect of disenfranchisement by those who would vote in their stead illegally, or have their votes cancelled out by those voting illegally in place of deceased voters who have yet to be removed from the rolls. If it is not discriminatory for Vermont citizens to be required to show ID to get married or buy alcohol, it is certainly not discriminatory to make them show ID to vote.
If Gingrich and Santorum hadn't split the conservative vote, Romney wouldn't have won two of his biggest states - OH or MI. Even you, IB, would have to admit that.Romney is going to take the rest, with or without Newt Gingrich in the race.
You assume that if Gingrich wasn't there, they'd vote for Santorum. I disagree. I think that the only reason there are Gingrich voters is because there are a bunch of conservatives who can't get themselves to vote for Santorum because he is such a dumbass. Why else would they not be already voting for Santorum instead of Gingrich with all of Newt's problems? They'll vote for Romney because they know people can legitimately change positions on healthcare or abortion. You can't change dumbass...Professor Tiger wrote:Today, Blago must have found out he can't bring his footlocker full of hair care products with him to prison.If Gingrich and Santorum hadn't split the conservative vote, Romney wouldn't have won two of his biggest states - OH or MI. Even you, IB, would have to admit that.Romney is going to take the rest, with or without Newt Gingrich in the race.
If Gingrich gets out, then the 60+% of the R electorate that has been voting against Romney will continue to do so, only now for one conservative candidate instead of two. And the 30+% of the R electorate that has been voting for Romney will continue to do so. Romney will start losing a lot.
But if Gingrich stays in and that Gingrich/Santorum split continues (and I suspect it will), Romney will keep getting his 30+%, Gingrich and Santorum will each get their 30-%, and Romney wins the nomination. He will be a rare example of a nominee that never won his own party's base.
Ummm, maybe the reason all those Gingrich voters still insist on voting for Gingrich is Gingrich is still in the race?You assume that if Gingrich wasn't there, they'd vote for Santorum. I disagree. I think that the only reason there are Gingrich voters is because there are a bunch of conservatives who can't get themselves to vote for Santorum because he is such a dumbass.
Have you noticed that the Afghans didn't go nearly as crazy with the shooting of their civilians than they did when we burned their Korans? I think it's because the murder victims were mostly women and children. That means that the adult victims were female and half the child victims were female. In Afghan eyes, the only real tragedy was the death of the boys.Jungle Rat wrote:So a few days ago one of our boys went fucking psycho and killed 16 Afghan civilians. Total outrage. Today 13 Afghans are killed by a roadside device most probably not planted there by our boys. Can't wait to see the outrage.
The horrid part of this whole thing is Obama is as weak as a wet shit bag. And the GOP can't muster anything remotely more competitive than a trio of other wet shit bags to take advantage.sardis wrote:Professor Tiger wrote:Today, Blago must have found out he can't bring his footlocker full of hair care products with him to prison.If Gingrich and Santorum hadn't split the conservative vote, Romney wouldn't have won two of his biggest states - OH or MI. Even you, IB, would have to admit that.Romney is going to take the rest, with or without Newt Gingrich in the race.
If Gingrich gets out, then the 60+% of the R electorate that has been voting against Romney will continue to do so, only now for one conservative candidate instead of two. And the 30+% of the R electorate that has been voting for Romney will continue to do so. Romney will start losing a lot.
But if Gingrich stays in and that Gingrich/Santorum split continues (and I suspect it will), Romney will keep getting his 30+%, Gingrich and Santorum will each get their 30-%, and Romney wins the nomination. He will be a rare example of a nominee that never won his own party's base.
You assume that if Gingrich wasn't there, they'd vote for Santorum. I disagree. I think that the only reason there are Gingrich voters is because there are a bunch of conservatives who can't get themselves to vote for Santorum because he is such a dumbass. Why else would they not be already voting for Santorum instead of Gingrich with all of Newt's problems? They'll vote for Romney because they know people can legitimately change positions on healthcare or abortion. You can't change dumbass...
Totally agree.The horrid part of this whole thing is Obama is as weak as a wet shit bag. And the GOP can't muster anything remotely more competitive than a trio of other wet shit bags to take advantage.
Totally agree with this too.Oh, and its time for Obama to tell Afganastench, "Goodbye and Good Luck.". Fuck that crazy ass place.