Page 302 of 1476

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:41 pm
by bluetick
"MY news source is on the level, but ALL the others are in the bag for the other guy. That's not paranoia talking - that's FACT.

I believe a lot of people think I'm paranoid. Elitists they are...inane idiots."

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:49 pm
by Professor Tiger
But please, continue chirping about "SantoRomney" like an MSNBC talking head.
Ummm, the difference between me and MSNBC-types is I think Obama has been a bad president and deserves to be defeated. He is extremely vulnerable based on the sputtering economy, high unemployment, the staggering debt he ran up, his anti-oil energy policy, high gas prices and bureaucratic Obamacare. I think Obama is a political 98 pound weakling. But I also think he is likely to beat either a 92 pound weakling in a sweater vest, or (more likely), a 90 pound ideological cross-dresser. It's appalling that Santorum and Romney is the best the GOP can do against such a failed president.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:01 pm
by bluetick
The 98 pound weakling reference wrt to oprama is fair in some respects.

What he ought to do is start a couple of wars. History says nobody wants to change horses in the middle of a war/stream.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:07 pm
by Toemeesleather
what "frivolity" do I "love chattering about



A likeable one-issue naif or a political transvestite..

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:11 pm
by bluetick
lmao

GOP Wants Candidates to Sign Purity Pledge - ABC News

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/sc-c ... e-15858883

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:14 pm
by Toemeesleather
Could this be a Dukakis moment?


Image

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:00 pm
by puterbac
Damnit this is beyond suck...he had to go back in though. No way he couldn't try. JMFA...

Special Forces soldier dies trying to save NC kids

By MICHAEL BIESECKER and EMERY P. DALESIO
Associated Press

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... 6-13-03-50

HOPE MILLS, N.C. (AP) -- A decorated Green Beret who returned from his fifth deployment to Afghanistan last summer died Tuesday trying to rescue his two young daughters from their burning home near Fort Bragg. The girls were also killed in the blaze.

Edward Cantrell and his wife escaped from the 1 a.m. blaze by jumping from the home's second floor, the Cumberland County sheriff's office said. Cantrell then wrapped himself in a blanket and re-entered the burning home in Hope Mills, about 10 miles from the Army base that is home to the Green Berets and other Special Forces units, sheriff's spokeswoman Debbie Tanna said.

Cantrell, 36, was trying to reach 6-year-old Isabella and 4-year-old Natalia, who were trapped in second-floor bedrooms, Tanna said.

------------

The three bodies were all recovered on the second floor, he said. It did not appear the father was able to reach the girls.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:04 pm
by Professor Tiger
Toemeesleather wrote:what "frivolity" do I "love chattering about

A likeable one-issue naif or a political transvestite..
That Santorum is a one-issue naif and Romney is a political transvestite is not frivolous. It is important. Even tragic.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:09 pm
by puterbac
Voted Romney today.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:28 pm
by Professor Tiger
The 98 pound weakling reference wrt to oprama is fair in some respects.

What he ought to do is start a couple of wars.
History says nobody wants to change horses in the middle of a war/stream.
That's what I said:
Professor Tiger wrote: Even if Obama somehow falls behind in the polls, he'll just pull a Bill Clinton and attack Iran next October. That's why he told Bibby to wait.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:23 pm
by Dr. Strangelove
Prof- You have to understand. Romney once deeply believed in being pro-choice. He just had a change of heart. Now he just as deeply believes in being pro-life. It had nothing at all to do with his electorate. They were real, genuine changes of heart. It's not about getting elected.

BTW, he will be bringing all those jobs overseas back to Michigan!!!!!

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:16 pm
by Op Ed
Op Ed wrote:Yeah... some things just have a way of coming back.

Ready for four more years of Obama?

I will be voting tomorrow in the Vermont primary for a Republican... not to sandbag for the worst option... but for the guy who I want to beat Obama.
innocentbystander wrote:Hi OpEd! Been a few years man!
Hey IB, has it been that long since WXing crashed?

Are you still in Arizona?

We may be going to the Canyon sometime in April or May.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:17 pm
by Op Ed
Professor Tiger wrote:And welcome back, Op Ed.
Thanks Professor, I look forward to the religious discussions.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:20 pm
by Op Ed
puterbac wrote:Voted Romney today.
Which one?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:20 pm
by bluetick
puterbac wrote:Voted Romney today.
Me too, comrade. And Jarrett and Ballard, too (screw the Black Wednesday old guard).

Got the heebee jeebees voting in the R primary again. That weird double agent-Body Snatcher-Stepford vibe. I know y'all know what I'm talkin' about..

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:25 pm
by Dr. Strangelove
Tennessee is Santorum country

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:33 pm
by bluetick
We were Huckabeans last time around.

we shore no how to pic 'em

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:54 pm
by Dr. Strangelove
Ohio could go Santorum too...depends on whether turnout was high enough in the urban areas to put Romney on top. Rick is cleaning up in farm and coal country

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:08 pm
by Professor Tiger
Santorum must have promised a lot of ceement ponds and rheumatiz medicine in Tennessee.

I still think Romney gets the win in Ohio. Battalions of gardeners, chauffers, chambermaids and butlers have been flying in all day to vote.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:26 am
by innocentbystander
Hi Ed, yes still in Arizona.

First the bad news tonight, there is plenty of bad news to go around....

Romney, bad news, you lost North Dakota. That was BAD. Real Bad.

Santorum, terrible news, you lost Ohio by a c-nt hair. That was TERRIBLE! You just gave Romney back all the momentum.

Gingrich, awful news. You won Georgia. You won nothing else. That was awful. Get out Mr Speaker. Just get out of the race.

I refuse to acknowledge the existance of Ron Paul.

Good news? Well, really only one candidate has any good news and that is Mitt Romney. He will not get two-thirds of all of tonight's delegates. He'll get (maybe) three-fifth's of all the delegates. A good night. Not a great night by any means, (not when you lose North Dakota) but a good night.

And to all of you, have a good night.