Page 271 of 1476

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:49 pm
by Hacksaw
I thought liberals were so sensitive about that whole seperation of church and state thingy...I guess only when it suits them...

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/val ... 16821.html

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:41 am
by Toemeesleather
His allies are rallying round in desperation and now, panic.


Image

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 10:20 am
by Hacksaw
Yep. Get ready. 9:1 will decide the election.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:45 am
by AugustWest
sign the petition against SOPA

http://sopastrike.com/strike

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:51 pm
by Professor Tiger
Hacksaw wrote:Yep. Get ready. 9:1 will decide the election.
I totally agree that the national media is hopelessly and totally in bed with Democrats in general, and Obama in particular. But I do question whether the MSM can single handedly get their candidate elected. If the media were as powerful as you say, then how does ANY Republican EVER get elected? Reagan, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. somehow all got elected despite the media's best efforts. The MSM isn't THAT powerfu

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:44 pm
by Hacksaw
The difference is Obama and the way they have packaged him as The Chosen One. He's not Al Gore or John Kerry, although they certainly tried everything they could to help those dorks, too. They'll pull out all the stops for Obama. That Newsweek cover is only the beginning. Wait until they blatantly begin suggesting that anyone who doesn't vote for Obama is racist.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:41 pm
by Toemeesleather
Yep, Obammer is just smarter by running against congress and not on his record, and promises of hope and change.....if this same strategy were a Repub, the headline would be (_______) is going negative in his campaign.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:15 pm
by Jungle Rat
Hacksaw wrote:The difference is Obama and the way they have packaged him as The Chosen One. He's not Al Gore or John Kerry, although they certainly tried everything they could to help those dorks, too. They'll pull out all the stops for Obama. That Newsweek cover is only the beginning. Wait until they blatantly begin suggesting that anyone who doesn't vote for Obama is racist.
Heh. Poor grandpa

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:57 pm
by Hacksaw
It's official...you are stalking me. You don't ever have anything to say, but you just can't resist chiming in with some useless comment every time I post. Listen, dude, I'm very flattered. But I just don't like you that way, okay? Try to get over me. It's really for the best.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:08 pm
by puterbac
Who would have thought that W would make Oprama look like a total tool in press conferences.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:12 am
by Jungle Rat
Hack. Stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:39 am
by Professor Tiger
Obama rejected the Keystone pipeline. Instead of creating a lot of jobs and significantly decreasing our dependance on Middle Eastern oil, he has decided to cave in to the environmentalist wackjobs.

If the R's have any shred of competence (which is a big if), they can make him pay for this in the next election. Most Americans will see this decision as the sheer lunacy that it truly is.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:50 am
by sardis
Even the Washington Post is dissing the decision...Maybe it is now 8:2

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ ... story.html

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:57 am
by Toemeesleather
From....Pass this bill...NOW!


Image



to....We can't be rushed creating jobs in the oil pipeline biz.....



Offer of taglines is still open.......

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:45 pm
by Professor Tiger
Offer of taglines is still open.......
If Romney is the nominee, I'll take that bet.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:49 pm
by Toemeesleather
Aight.....One stipulation, all bets off if there's a third party/Independent write-in....like Ron Paul.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:44 pm
by puterbac
And yet unions will campaign for him and vote for him.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:30 am
by Professor Tiger
Toemeesleather wrote:Aight.....One stipulation, all bets off if there's a third party/Independent write-in....like Ron Paul.
There are third party/independent candidates in every election. I voted for one last time, and might do so again if Romney is the R nominee.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:38 am
by Professor Tiger
Turns out Santorum won Iowa. With the belatedly discovery of new votes, which changed the outcome of the caucus, you'd think ACORN was involved.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:34 pm
by puterbac
What a bunch of bullshit. What biz is it of govts to FORCE insurance companies by regulatory fiat to give away bitrh control? $15 a month co-pay isn't affordable? Fucking idiotic...

Health plans ordered to cover birth control without co-pays

http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/he ... ut-co-pays