Page 26 of 49
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:00 am
by Dr. Strangelove
The Gray Ghost wrote:Dr. Strangelove wrote:Yes. Same SEC team that beat both LSU and South Carolina ....
When it had a 4-year starting All-SEC QB and a few other quality starters.
Nebraska was without their starting QB as well. They were playing a freshman.
At any rate I've been assured that any SEC team's 3rd stringers could easily dismantle a team from the pathetic and terrible Big10 or Big12
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:10 am
by aTm
right
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:33 am
by THE_WIZARD_
Central Florida > Baylor > Oklahoma > SEC
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:33 am
by THE_WIZARD_
SEC! SEC! SEC! LMAO!!!
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:34 am
by THE_WIZARD_
The mystique created by the media is over! LMAO!!!
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 7:24 am
by Jungle Rat
Wizzie is a Sooner?
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:28 am
by KeviNole
THE_WIZARD_ wrote:The mystique created by the media is over! LMAO!!!
Child, please.
Bama was unmotivated, they only come to play for MNC games.
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:51 am
by The Gray Ghost
Auburn broke the curse, Bammer has returned to being a mere mortal. Saban exits stage left to Texas.
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:28 am
by dave_rickart
a Husker fan relegated to using Sooner smack. classic.
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:46 am
by hedge
Worth every cent!!!
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:49 am
by hedge
Actually, it may not have been worth that 700 millionth cent, but the other 699,999,999 cents were...
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:59 pm
by Jungle Rat
Please jump in front of a moving train. Your posts have really sucked lately. Like fingernails on a chalkboard.
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:34 am
by Dr. Strangelove
Jungle Rat wrote:Please jump in front of a moving train. Your posts have really sucked lately. Like fingernails on a chalkboard.
Whereas yours have been copy & paste jobs since 1998. I expect to see references to Sysop Mike and the Y2K Crisis most of the time you post.
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:35 am
by The Gray Ghost
The SEC's down year continues - 6-2 with 2 bowls to go.
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:41 am
by Dr. Strangelove
The Gray Ghost wrote:The SEC's down year continues - 6-2 with 2 bowls to go.
I didn't see any of the Cotton Bowl since it was up against our shitfest, but this was the best team the SEC has beaten, IMO.
BTW, why the hell were these two games on at the same time? Could Fox really not have shown this earlier in the day?
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:44 am
by 10ac
Strong to Texas?
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:46 am
by Dr. Strangelove
10ac wrote:Strong to Texas?
If so, welcome back to obscurity, Louisville.
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:55 am
by Jungle Rat
sour puss
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 7:15 am
by KeviNole
Strong is an excellent coach...can he navigate the political BS at Texas though?
Mack excelled at that but not as much at coaching. From what I hear, Jimbo isn't that good at it either so I think that would be a poor move for him (and Saban) to make.
Re: SEC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 7:55 pm
by The Gray Ghost
Vandy does it part, 7-2 with one left.