Page 244 of 756

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:57 pm
by Jungle Rat
Their TV markets alone will put them ahead of those two but I get the point. They have to move now though. If you think about it the UC & Louisville TV markets might both be top 5 in the Big 12.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:50 pm
by DooKSucks
Jesus. At this point, I am hoping that Swofford retires tonight and capable leadership is hired immediately. Otherwise, the ACC is fucked.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:26 pm
by sardis
over Maryland leaving? The only one fucked is the Big East, except for basketball. Swofford is doing a pretty good job through all this consoliation mess considering he's got a league full of shitty football programs.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:26 pm
by 10ac
.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:27 pm
by 10ac
DooKSucks wrote:Jesus. At this point, I am hoping that Swofford retires tonight and capable leadership is hired immediately. Otherwise, the ACC is fucked.
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:29 pm
by eCat
2,343,000 have dropped Willis McGahee



Denver Broncos running back Willis McGahee has a torn medial collateral ligament in his right knee and will miss six to eight weeks.

McGahee also has a fracture in the bone in his lower right leg. He will be on crutches for about a month, and doctors have told him not to put any weight on his leg, according to a source. McGahee will not need surgery and he believes he can come back in four to six weeks, even though the team thinks it's a six- to eight-week injury.

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:54 pm
by aTm
That Torrey Smith trade looks pretty good now doesn't it!

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:58 pm
by billy bob bocephus
considering he's got a league full of shitty football programs.
that's because since VT and Miami came in only basketball schools have been (ahem)courted...

note - lack of reference to BC is deliberate

Re: College Football

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:13 pm
by eCat
aTm wrote:That Torrey Smith trade looks pretty good now doesn't it!

yep

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
by Saint
Carolina and Dook to the Big 10

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:54 am
by Owlman
Why would the Big Ten take Duke? They don't compare at all in Football revenue

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:03 am
by THE_WIZARD_
The B1G wants UNC...not Duke.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:34 am
by AugustWest
They have to take either Duke or UVa to get U*NC.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:43 am
by THE_WIZARD_
They won't take Duke. They would take UVA. Of course they want ND far worse but that ain't happening.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:51 am
by BigRedMan
The Big Ten will now be known as the Big 10-4 good buddy conference.

Please make a note of it.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:18 am
by 10ac
LMAO.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:44 am
by THE_WIZARD_
Nope...we will add a west coast team and be called the "Sea To Shining Sea" Conference...

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:22 pm
by DooKSucks
I could see a UNC and UVa combo in the Big 10. They could go to four, four-team pods with UVa, UNC, Maryland and Rutgers making up the East Coast pod.

I much prefer the Big 10 to the SEC. The Big 10 is a better cultural fit for Carolina. The academic types would bitch about big money sports, but the Big 10 does a lot of innovative things with academics. The university could placate the academic types with the research dollars from the Big 10 initiative and sell the fact that the Big 10 has a stellar academic background, unlike the SEC.

Either way, we will be even more fucked in football, but the Big 10 is a better fit overall, imho.

Also, the same thing can be said for UVa, but they're even bigger pretentious pricks than we are.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:27 pm
by aTm
I wonder how long a bunch of schools in the midwest will continue to be academic powerhouses. Adding UVA, UNC, Maryland, Rutgers would probably help the Big Ten as far as the next 100 years go more than the rest of the Big Ten add to those 4 schools.

Re: College Football

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:28 pm
by Owlman
I don't know if the state of Virginia would let Virginia go without Va. Tech