The Goat Pen

If we can survive a domestic catastrophe like a BRM family Thanksgiving, then we can survive any Israeli/Russia nuclear bombardment half-way around the world. I think I’m in the majority in US that says just go ahead and obliterate each other. You fucktards have been at each other for millennia. Go ahead and end it.

that UHC CEO getting shot is a crazy story. Bullets engraved with the title of a book relating to how insurance companies refuse to pay claims.

While I don't support it, that murder is going to bring about positive change.

Already saw on twitter where someone posted that Chipotle is yet again raising their prices and someone asked who the CEO was

"I read somewhere that the original total for underground detonations was slightly higher, but it was later determined that it was just BRM unleashing hell on a toilet somewhere in Indiana…"

A, even though the target won't see it...

As far as the nuclear testing thing, I knew they had detonated a bunch of test nukes but I had no idea it was near that number. Makes you wonder about the possibility of a so-called nuclear holocaust. Of course, all of these were done in remote locations and I guess we'll never know the radioactive damage that was caused, but goddamn, over 2000 nukes have been detonated since 1945 (and I would guess most of those were before 1970), so in a 25 year period thousands of nukes were detonated and I never even knew about it or heard of any long term negative effects worldwide. Obviously the human toll would be massively higher if those nukes were detonated over population centers, but it seems like the earth will be just fine even if all of the world's nuclear arsenals were launched simultaneously. It would probably be the end of human life (except for maybe New Zealand and the Faulkland Islands and some other remote locations) but that might be an improvement as far as the Earth is concerned...

My mother would say that’s how the cabal is controlling the weather…and the tides…

Nuclear testing or BRM taking a dump?

If they ban Tic Tok, how is tree going to beat off to underage minors?

I've long advocated the killing of CEOs and bombing of the IRS bldg, which those Jan 6 idiots should have done. It's good to see my ideas taking root.

Now we need to invade Mexico

**Views expressed are not officially endorsed by goatpen.net

I don’t beat off to tik tok. Jesus. I look at fat girls on there for a bit then when I’m good and horny I beat it to real porn sites.

sardis wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2024 8:35 am I wonder if any of you ChatGPTers can ask what would happen to us on the Eastern USA if a nuclear weapon or two was set off in Ukraine, Western Russia, or the Middle East. How would it affect our climate, biology, water quality, etc.I know economically wouldn’t matter much, so just trying to see if I should be giving a shit.

The 1986 Chernobyl meltdown, until they were able to bury the whole thing with concrete and stop the meltdown with liquid nitrogen, the pollutants from the core melting down gave off an equivalent amount of 48 Hiroshima bombs worth of radioactivity, each day. If it took them just a week to get it under control (and it was way more than that) then Ukraine was polluted to the tune of 336 Atom bombs. And deer graze on the topsoil covering the concrete, today.

Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield calls off surgery anesthesia cap

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/05/blue-c ... t-new-york

Rap somebody on the beak you get some attention around here…

When you shoot one man in the street it's murder. When you kill thousands of people in hospitals by taking away their ability to get treatment you're an entrepreneur," an X user wrote.

We’re net exporters of food and energy. I think the only international threat to the USA is lack of semi-conductor production and cyber threats. As long as we keep the bad guys out of the hemisphere, we’re good.

I also don’t believe the theories of the US needed to be in the World Wars. I know it’s been discussed on here, but there is no way, logistically, a power other than God and the antiChrist can rule the world. They’d be stretched too thin. Roman’s couldn’t do it, Europeans couldn’t do it. Germany wouldn’t have been able to do it, even if US stayed out. The fact the USA NEEDS to be active in foreign affairs, outside this hemisphere, is only because of benevolence, not for some “national security” for the US.

sardis wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 8:50 am We’re net exporters of food and energy. I think the only international threat to the USA is lack of semi-conductor production and cyber threats. As long as we keep the bad guys out of the hemisphere, we’re good.

I also don’t believe the theories of the US needed to be in the World Wars. I know it’s been discussed on here, but there is no way, logistically, a power other than God and the antiChrist can rule the world. They’d be stretched too thin. Roman’s couldn’t do it, Europeans couldn’t do it. Germany wouldn’t have been able to do it, even if US stayed out. The fact the USA NEEDS to be active in foreign affairs, outside this hemisphere, is only because of benevolence, not for some “national security” for the US.

From 1588 to 1945, the British Empire (of which the sun never set) was the world's policeman. One out of every six people in uniform on the earth were loyal to the crown in Buckingham Palace. And the empire did it with a collective GDP half what the USA had in 1945. Maybe you are correct, but with the absence of power, someone will step up to fil that space. If it is not us, then who?

Yet they couldn’t keep a small militia at bay in their colonies in the Western Hemisphere.

sardis wrote: ↑Sat Dec 07, 2024 11:37 am Yet they couldn’t keep a small militia at bay in their colonies in the Western Hemisphere.

The militia (British Colonist farmers on the Continent) were mostly former British Army. Many (almost all) served the Crown in the French and Indian war as much younger men, AND by 1777 they dramatically outnumbered the British Army on the Continent. In some engagements, the Continental Army had a 3 to 1 numerical advantage. By the time Cornwallis was cornered at Yorktown, he could only have wished he was at just a 3 to 1 disadvantage in numbers. Any tactical advantages that British military generals used in fighting abroad, those advantages were neutralized and mitigated when facing an enemy that matched their weapons, matched their tactics, and had superior numbers. The Continental militiamen, they were not (nor were they ever) illiterate, 3rd world peasants rising up against the empire the way they tried in India, the Middle East, and Africa.

Moreover, logistically fighting a war from more than 3000 nautical miles with 18th century naval ships, was damn near impossible for the British Empire. The only way the empire could serve AS the unbeatable empire was when the local British Colonists (wherever the empire was serving) were logistically supporting the Imperial troops! That is why the empire won the French and Indian war. In this instance (American Revolution), the local British Colonists were fighting directly against them offering NO logistical support.

So, yeah. There was not much the empire could do in this one case. The British Colonists in the 13 colonies in 1776, they were the wealthiest, the most educated, the most intelligent, the most literate, the most numerous, and the most sophisticated colonists there has ever been in the entire world history of colonists of every empire that has ever existed on this planet at any time, ever.

"I think the only international threat to the USA is lack of semi-conductor production and cyber threats."

Other than that, how did you like the play, Mrs. Lincoln?