Page 230 of 1659

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:38 pm
by The Anti k*
hedge wrote:"Speaking of which, would you fuckers nut up and take that 1 seed? I don't want you guys on the other side of our bracket..."

I can't see that happening unless we totally implode, as in lose to either Maryland/Dook and then lose before the ACC tourny finals, and even then I think the committee would gamble on at least a FF matchup b/w us. If we win out, they'll definitely set it up for a potential Finals clash b/w UNC and UK. Not saying that either of us will make it there, but that would obviously be the dream matchup from a ratings standpoint...
God, I hope so. But if we don't kick dook*'s ass in the outhouse Saturday night, we don't deserve anything better than the shittiest #2 seed in the tournament. I will say this -- it'd be unfair to Kentucky after the season they've had. Not that they couldn't/wouldn't beat us in an Elite 8 matchup, but to have them replay their toughest home game all season long, on a neutral court as the #1 team in the nation, would be something I'd have expected of the NCAA selection committee in the days of unK*le tom butters as the chairman.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:42 pm
by The Anti k*
Oh and Bluecat, I appreciate rival fans like you who "get it". I'd root like hell for Kentucky if they meet up with dook* -- and you know how I feel about our all-time rivalry with the Cats. I will shit concrete Christmas trees if all the top dogs lose like in 2010, paving the way to another gift-wrapped crown for k*rzythead.

And no one is more to blame than my Heels if we don't take care of business this weekend.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:52 pm
by innocentbystander
hedge wrote:You don't trust us enough to put 50 fucking dollars in a pool, yet you're willing to put money down based on any of us untrustworthy people's picks? You are truly a fucking idiot...
This fucking idiot trusts that a sportsbook would actually PAY ON MY WINNING BET the way I have no proof that any of you would.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:45 pm
by hedge
And yet you trust a forum full of people who regard you as a total idiot and who would like nothing more than to fuck you over in any way possible to give you a winning pick that you clearly are prepared to put money down on. That alone is sufficient proof of your idiocy. Not that we needed anymore proof, but it seems you can't help giving it every time you post. Here's a tip: Put your life savings on whoever UK is playing in the first round of the SEC tourny. That's sure to be a winner. Go for it, faggoth...

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:49 pm
by DooKSucks
The pools have been going on for years, and do you really think a winner would be quiet if someone didn't pay up? Seriously? You are a fucking fool. It's a damn shame you weren't aborted.
innocentbystander wrote:
hedge wrote:You don't trust us enough to put 50 fucking dollars in a pool, yet you're willing to put money down based on any of us untrustworthy people's picks? You are truly a fucking idiot...
This fucking idiot trusts that a sportsbook would actually PAY ON MY WINNING BET the way I have no proof that any of you would.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:50 pm
by innocentbystander
Dear two TarHeel fans,

Baby blue is a faggot color. May your tourney end in another crushing defeat from Duke. And eat a dick full of AIDS.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:42 am
by Saint
if Mich. St. is a No. 1 seed then i hope unC is a No. 2 in that regional. fuckin' Sparty couldn't beat Carolina if the Heels started Roy, Gut and Dean

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:15 am
by crashcourse
if KU is the last 1 seed and carolina is the first 2 seed they go in the same bracket don't they?

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:27 am
by eCat
crashcourse wrote:if KU is the last 1 seed and carolina is the first 2 seed they go in the same bracket don't they?
not always, geographic location comes into play as well

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:05 pm
by crotch
Will dook and unc get to play all their tourney games within 50 miles of their campus again this year??

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:39 pm
by goldenbear
Boston and Atlanta are the regional final sites, so I that is not within 50 miles

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:03 pm
by BigRedMan
If IU knocks off MSU tonite, then no way they get a 1 seed.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:46 pm
by Saint
if UNC and UK end up in the same regional, that means UNC is an overall No. 8 and I can't see that happening unless they lose Saturday and again in the ACC semis. then they might end up as a 3 seed

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:01 pm
by crashcourse
BigRedMan wrote:If IU knocks off MSU tonite, then no way they get a 1 seed.
not only knocked off but dominated

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:04 pm
by hedge
With IU beating MSU tonight, they'll definitely end up in our bracket as a 3 or 4 seed. They've already knocked off UK, OSU and now MSU, the obvious thing to do is continue the giant killer theme and put them in UNC's bracket for a potential juiced up Sweet 16 or Elite 8 matchup. To say nothing of the Zeller vs. Zeller story line...

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:31 pm
by goldenbear
MSU is not a number one seed

and never should be put in consideration

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:33 pm
by Jungle Rat
The same goes with you at parenting.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:41 pm
by Jungle Rat
Not to rip on BRM because that happens almost daily but honestly, how many of those Top 5 wins happen on a neutral court in Salt Lake City? Or Jersey. Still, nice win though.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:06 am
by innocentbystander
goldenbear wrote:MSU is not a number one seed

and never should be put in consideration
Welp.....

...I think the B1G-TEN(12) and the Big-XII(10) have officially beat each other up so much, they forfeit any possibility of getting a number one in the tourney. So that puts us in a bind unless the ACC gets two #1 bids (wont fucking happen.)

We don't really have enough information yet, but barring any huge upsets in the conferance tourneys, I think our number ones will be Duke, Syracuse, Kentucky, & (for lack of any obvious choice) Murray State (given they will end the season @ 30-1). I really want to hesitate putting such a little-itty-bitty team in as a number one (particularly when SDSU @ 33-2 was only a 2) but at this point, who would be that 4th and final #1? All the best teams from the power conferances have way too many regular season losses and more losses will be coming. Murray State is just a c-nt hair away from being 31-0.

The #2 seeds, okay yeah, UNC, the Big-XII(10) winner say Mizzou, Michigan State, and either Witchita State or California.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:17 am
by CAT
I just read about Hizzy--I don't read this thread and haven't been posting for a while. Rat or eCat--you could have let me know on FB. We will miss that gentle soul and his wonderful humour, he never said a nasty word to or about anyone. Damn guys, --and Karen--take care of yourselves, we may not have met but you have all touched my life. Just be safe.