Page 213 of 289
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:52 am
by Orangefreak
LMAO @ five hookers!!!
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:57 am
by Orangefreak
Ghost,
The good news is I'm not to the point where I think our D is that bad. Yet. What happened yesterday was our offense's inability to stay on the field long enough to give our D a rest. And news flash: Oregon's offense is pretty darn good. They are the #2 team in the country for a reason.
The bad news: with our team the way it is, the defense being good or bad is irrelevant. Until our QB starts throwing the ball like he has a pair between his legs and our receivers start to get more experience, games like yesterday will happen. Don't sweat our upcoming game just yet; Florida has more than a chance to pull out a W. Our game could very well be a duel of the worthless QB's in college FB.
I'm looking at the rest of our schedule. All of our games, with the possible exceptions of KY and South 'bama, are toss ups to put it kindly.
Our school needs the money bad. I hope we can pull out six wins to get to a bowl. I'm not buying any tickets to a bowl game just yet...
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:24 pm
by dave_rickart
Orangefreak wrote:Our special teams are going to cost us this game.
don't think it was the special teams that were the problem....
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:48 am
by Orangefreak
Let's just say the special teams didn't exactly help. They were just one of the problems. Several problems.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:51 am
by Orangefreak
And since I made the mistake of bringing the Dooley up...
Dooley had absolutely nothing when he came here. His result was a bit predictable. Jones has more to work with compared to what Dooley had. If Jones doesn't at least sniff a bowl invite, he should be in trouble, IMO.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:06 am
by Jungle Rat
LOL
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:22 am
by aTm
Orangefreak wrote:Hello.
New pic: Manziel signing for Tieman
Eh... shouldn't his highness be declared ineligible to play?! I guess that is the schools decision but T&M doesn't seem to be very proactive about this. Could come back to haunt them.
Fucking Bray.
Fucking Couch
A&M declared Manziel ineligible and the NCAA cleared him to play after a suspension. There is no new information in that photo, not even any evidence that he signed hundreds of items for this guy. Where's the photo of him sitting down and signing a thousand items?
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:30 am
by 10ac
[youtube]1qP-NglUeZU[/youtube]
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:32 am
by Jungle Rat
Damn. You beat me to it
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:32 am
by aTm
T&P for your ineligible player that took a check.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:55 pm
by bluetick
Orangefreak wrote:
I wasn't happy when Dooley was canned. If Wilcox hadn't left for Washington and we had the same defense for the 2012 season we did in 2011, we would have done no worse than 8 wins and probably gone 10-2. Dooley coached up what he had which was nothing. As a reward, he got canned for circumstances well beyond his control (he did pick Sal though...)[/i]
I go all the way back to cnnazi...15 or 16 years ago...that has GOT to be the single dumbest thing I've read in this continuum EVER.
"Canned for circumstances well beyond his control." Barbara, is that you??
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:00 pm
by bluetick
Orangefreak wrote:TOUCHDOWN TENNESSEE!!!
Take that you ugly Oregon skank!!!
Now play a full game Vols...
Loves Dooley; thinks one of the world's best-looking women is a skank.
Pull yer head out, OF.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:20 pm
by The Gray Ghost
I go all the way back to cnnazi...15 or 16 years ago...that has GOT to be the single dumbest thing that didn't come from Luna or Wizard that I've read in this continuum EVER.
TFTFY
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:40 pm
by bluetick
The Gray Ghost wrote:
TFTFY
heh. Fair enough.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:54 pm
by AlabamAlum
Sunseri is at Florida State now. Seems to be doing okay.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:33 pm
by KeviNole
AlabamAlum wrote:Sunseri is at Florida State now. Seems to be doing okay.
Heh - debatable I guess. Pruitt is the DC and is implementing a much more complex scheme and it has shown at times with breakdowns against Pitt and Nevada, particularly in the run game. Sunseri coaches the DEs, and that has been a weak spot so far, but when you lose three DEs to the NFL, you're probably going to struggle at first.
The defense has been good enough against an average (Pitt) and a below average (Nevada without their starting QB and RB) offense. BC's offense was very bad against USC, so if they get >5.5 ypp and 17 points against us, I'll be a bit concerned about Clemson. Maryland could be a good test as well.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:43 pm
by Jungle Rat
bluetick wrote:Orangefreak wrote:
I wasn't happy when Dooley was canned. If Wilcox hadn't left for Washington and we had the same defense for the 2012 season we did in 2011, we would have done no worse than 8 wins and probably gone 10-2. Dooley coached up what he had which was nothing. As a reward, he got canned for circumstances well beyond his control (he did pick Sal though...)[/i]
I go all the way back to cnnazi...15 or 16 years ago...that has GOT to be the single dumbest thing I've read in this continuum EVER.
"Canned for circumstances well beyond his control." Barbara, is that you??
If my mom didn't marry my dad and married someone else instead maybe my dick would be smaller.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 4:30 pm
by hedge
Impossible...
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:12 pm
by Jungle Rat
Your mom didn't think so.
Re: Tennessee Volunteers
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:59 pm
by hedge
She didn't think your dick could've possibly been smaller? You're correct...