Re: College Football
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:03 am
Goodell was strangely huggy with the big men last night...
Almost mathematically impossible? Wrong, it will happen, though probably not to a team with enough clout for people to care about.with 4, it is almost mathematically impossible to run the table and NOT make the playoff (the way Auburn did in 2004 and Cincinnati did 2 years ago)
it wont happen in our lifetimesaTm wrote:Almost mathematically impossible? Wrong, it will happen, though probably not to a team with enough clout for people to care about.with 4, it is almost mathematically impossible to run the table and NOT make the playoff (the way Auburn did in 2004 and Cincinnati did 2 years ago)
aTm,aTm wrote:You are a fucktard.
In the past 5 years there have been 4 teams who finished with undefeated records and have not been in the top 4 in the final BCS rankings. "Almost mathematically impossible" and "Never again in our lifetimes" is a fucking ridiculous thing to say.
Well it was before the BcS...but West Virginia was undefeated in 1993...and was passed over to a 1-loss FSU team.innocentbystander wrote:aTm,aTm wrote:You are a fucktard.
In the past 5 years there have been 4 teams who finished with undefeated records and have not been in the top 4 in the final BCS rankings. "Almost mathematically impossible" and "Never again in our lifetimes" is a fucking ridiculous thing to say.
i don't care about Boise State, Utah (pre 2011), or TCU (pre 2012.) i care about Cincinnati and Auburn.
point me to the season an undefeated BCS team wasn't playing for the national championship when a team with at least one loss WAS playing for the national championship
Kirk Herbstreit already went on record stating that the fear at the Rose Bowl is that people will "stay home" and not go to the game because Alumni/fans only get one weekend to travel to a bowl game a year, and the fans of both teams would believe it is their team that would be playing for the true National Championship, a week later. they want to go to that game insteadaTm wrote:I'm going to assume you mean major conference teams only, because otherwise you are nuts. That probably wont happen in our lifetimes, largely because theres no chance in hell we have 4 game playoff and it doesnt get expanded to 8 within a handful of years.
i don't count bowl alliance or bowl coalition or anything that far back. those things were formed by my grandfather, WWII dinosaurs, who still believed that a 9-2 Notre Dame must get an automatic bid for the National Championship simply because they knew the stadium would sellout, the tv ratings would be high, and 70,000,000 American Catholics would be sent to purgitory if they didn't watch the gameTHE_WIZARD_ wrote:Well it was before the BcS...but West Virginia was undefeated in 1993...and was passed over to a 1-loss FSU team.
i think the 4 team playoff must be "part" of the bowls. the concern here is money and game attendance. if you play it after the bowls, then that is two more games that alumni/fans have to travel to (two more weekends, gone) in the month of January. people can't do that, they have lives and responsibilities. fuck Wiz, some schools can't even sell out their alotment of tickets to one post season game (VPI has been on the hook for a million for Orange Bowl tickets, UConn on the hook for 2 million for Fiesta Bowl tickets)THE_WIZARD_ wrote:Well I don't know what the best plan would be...the most fair way is to include all the major conference champions and a couple 2 or 3 wild cards based on a point system. That way if you don't win your conference you can't say boo...and if you are a non-BCS school you still have a shot via a wild card. Take 8 teams...1st round and semis played at higher seeds. Play NC at a rotating venue just like Super Bowl. You can still have bowls (just whittle them down to a reasonable number...and make 7 wins a minimum). Bowls would be like the NIT tournament...
But they won't...at best we are looking at a 4 team tourney played AFTER the bowls. That is better than what we have but not perfect.
it is a huge deal if one of those teams playing in the playoffs is a smaller, private univeristy (with a smaller alumni base.) they will not go to all the games wizTHE_WIZARD_ wrote:In an 8-team playoff there would only be four teams playing an extra game IB...the losing Final Four teams would in essence have an extra game...the finals teams would have two extra games. I don't think that is a big deal.
its not just BC.THE_WIZARD_ wrote:Well tough shit then. We are going to accomodate an entire new playoff system for Boston College? Like they are going to sniff a playoff...lmao.