Re: Florida State Seminoles
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:17 pm
College Hoops, Disrespection, and More
https://goatpen.net/forums/
Agree, but we are talking about sheer industrial capacity and harassment of that capacity. Japan could never match that capacity but they would not have had to if they were constantly harassing us (at San Francisco) bombing our harbors and damaging our not even completed, ships. Put all 4 heavy CVs 100 miles off the coast of San Francsico and they could pretty much use tactical bombers (round the clock) against San Francisco. That would really have harmed our massive industrial capacity. I further agree that they didn't really want to do that, but win at Midway, then they COULD have done that. Where else could they use those carriers? They already had Manilla, Singapore, and Hong Kong. It was either Sydney, Calcutta, or San Francisco. You pick. You are Yamamoto, where would you send them?aTm wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 11:59 am Japan had no hope of ever using long range bombers on the US. Midway is over 3000 miles from California. The United States spent more money, personnel, effort in the B-29 project than what we put into the entire Manhattan Project just to build a long range bomber capable of bombing Japan from Tinian and Saipan which is half the distance from Japan ass Midway is to California. Japan had no prayer of ever having air superiority over the US because we would never run out of planes or pilots before they did, even if they solved all the technical problems just to get to the point to fly the mission. Just like ships, any bombers or carrier fighters they lost in such a mission could never come back, while any of our interceptors that they shot down would be replaced with 5 more in a month. The entire west coast would be filled with unsinkable carriers in the form of airstrips with fighters.
you're celebrating $4 a gallon gas? and you think you're saving money?Jungle Rat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 10:58 am Gas under 4 bucks down here. Filled up last week. Might have to again later this week. Wonder how much I'll save this time?
well, its stands to reason if they are going to make these women have children, then they should make the fathers more involved. On that same note, they should make contraception in multiple forms easily available and dirt cheaphedge wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:34 am I wonder how IB feels about this latest attempt to keep the man down?
Marco Rubio has introduced the Unborn Child Support Act creating child support obligations from conception (if the mother requests it).
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/356 ... onception/
Under the bill, mothers would be able to request child support from the month of conception onward, but would not be required to do so.
Mothers would also be able to choose whether to collect child support payments retroactively through the month of conception, including if paternity is only established after the birth of the child.
bingoeCat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:00 pmwell, its stands to reason if they are going to make these women have children, then they should make the fathers more involved. On that same note, they should make contraception in multiple forms easily available and dirt cheaphedge wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:34 am I wonder how IB feels about this latest attempt to keep the man down?
Marco Rubio has introduced the Unborn Child Support Act creating child support obligations from conception (if the mother requests it).
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/356 ... onception/
Under the bill, mothers would be able to request child support from the month of conception onward, but would not be required to do so.
Mothers would also be able to choose whether to collect child support payments retroactively through the month of conception, including if paternity is only established after the birth of the child.
hopefully the net result of all this nonsense is much more responsible sexual activity
You make this game so much fun.eCat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 12:42 pmyou're celebrating $4 a gallon gas? and you think you're saving money?Jungle Rat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 10:58 am Gas under 4 bucks down here. Filled up last week. Might have to again later this week. Wonder how much I'll save this time?
its amazing you get up each day and think you're a functionally literate adult.
So, the government should compel participation?innocentbystander wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:02 pmbingoeCat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:00 pmwell, its stands to reason if they are going to make these women have children, then they should make the fathers more involved. On that same note, they should make contraception in multiple forms easily available and dirt cheaphedge wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 8:34 am I wonder how IB feels about this latest attempt to keep the man down?
Marco Rubio has introduced the Unborn Child Support Act creating child support obligations from conception (if the mother requests it).
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/356 ... onception/
Under the bill, mothers would be able to request child support from the month of conception onward, but would not be required to do so.
Mothers would also be able to choose whether to collect child support payments retroactively through the month of conception, including if paternity is only established after the birth of the child.
hopefully the net result of all this nonsense is much more responsible sexual activity
well DS, thanks to people like you ruining marriage (after all, since any of your female clients can divorce their husbands AT WILL just to collect cash and prizes because they really want to fuck alphamcstudlyunemployedrockbanddrummer but they still want ex-husband's money) the "marriage model" for raising and supporting children is vanishing from the United States. You are at least partially to blame for that.DooKSucks wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:54 pmSo, the government should compel participation?innocentbystander wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:02 pmbingoeCat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:00 pm
well, its stands to reason if they are going to make these women have children, then they should make the fathers more involved. On that same note, they should make contraception in multiple forms easily available and dirt cheap
hopefully the net result of all this nonsense is much more responsible sexual activity
I would say that should enforce obligationDooKSucks wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:54 pmSo, the government should compel participation?innocentbystander wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:02 pmbingoeCat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:00 pm
well, its stands to reason if they are going to make these women have children, then they should make the fathers more involved. On that same note, they should make contraception in multiple forms easily available and dirt cheap
hopefully the net result of all this nonsense is much more responsible sexual activity
I know it must feel like shit for me to define your profession as just one step above an unborn baby murderer, but that IS your profession. You are a fucking leech, a tick with Lyme Disease, a vampire bat with rabies. You add no value to society, nothing. If a woman just wants cash and prizes (and has no real grounds for divorce) you will help her get one and leave her children and ex-husband, in ruin. And you get paid for that. That makes you a destroyer.