Page 20 of 49

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:52 pm
by GBJs
Thats just wrong..... funnyasshit but wrong.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:15 am
by Dr. Strangelove
The West looks significantly better than the East yet again

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 1:32 pm
by Jungle Rat
This actually made my eyes & ears bleed. Holy Fuck!

[youtube]d4E8mUxELNY[/youtube]

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:38 am
by Dr. Strangelove
Dear God...

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:42 pm
by GBJs
You guys want 'em for the B1G?

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:49 pm
by bluetick
I normally don't care for country & western, but after that debasement I'm leaning toward being a hater.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:58 pm
by GBJs
Country music is good stuff. Rocky Top always sounds better with fiddles ad banjos

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:38 pm
by bluetick
Rocky Top is it's own genre (although mortals would say it's kin to blue grass).

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 8:52 pm
by GBJs
Rocky Top would sound much better in Neyland with fiddles and banjos. Some things shouldn't be fucked with.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:34 pm
by Jungle Rat
Orange checkerboard end zones on the other hand......

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:55 pm
by Jungle Rat
Florida at this point is a middle of the road SEC team while aTm was a bottom of the road some other league team. This game will only be a talking point for Conference depth and the quality of the new additions.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:05 am
by Dr. Strangelove
Well, at least Missouri has that wonderful little country ditty to comfort them. Back in 1966 they once won a Sugar Bowl!

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 9:34 am
by dave_rickart
Mizzou - Georgia was competitive/even for three quarters. The Tigers acquitted themselves relatively well.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:51 pm
by 10ac
ridiculous. I'm through with the NFL.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:04 am
by Jungle Rat
If a tree falls in the woods.......

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:00 pm
by 10ac
Announcers should be banned from saying een-dis-pew-ta-bul.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:03 pm
by 10ac
The Committee on Infractions made it clear that it is establishing new precedent with this case and others moving forward.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sto ... -two-years

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:35 pm
by 10ac
I just heard the color guy on the CIAA Football Championship say "The team that scores first has won 6 out of the last 12 games so it's important to get off to a fast start".

He must have attended the ESPN Color Man Cliche Academy.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:17 pm
by DooKSucks
He sounds like a summa cum laude graduate from the University of Tennessee. Happy Thanksgiving, you fucktards.

Re: SEC - Conference Discussion

Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 10:57 pm
by 10ac
After UGA loses to Bama they will have the same record as aTm and will have lost to the SEC champ that aTm beat, ergo aTm should go to the Sugar. anything else would be a sham. Johnny Football, larger audience.....