Page 17 of 331
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:40 pm
by eCat
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:42 pm
by CAT
So it wouldn't bother you all if your wife had sex with a man as long as you could participate???? and I think and affair with either sex could be considered grounds for divorce--it was with a friend of mine.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:48 pm
by BigRedMan
CAT wrote:So it wouldn't bother you all if your wife had sex with a man as long as you could participate???? and I think and affair with either sex could be considered grounds for divorce--it was with a friend of mine.
Hell yes it would be bother me. I don't want another schlong in the mix. Fuck her fantasy, this is what I would want.
And yes depending ont he couple, it could be grounds for divorce. Again, to each his own.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:14 pm
by eCat
I getting a vibe here that Cat isn't into lesbian porn
honestly I could care less about the whole woman on woman thing - my wife being with another woman to me is on the same level of her masturbating with a sex toy. I'm no more intimidated by her having a 9" inch dildo than getting off by another woman.
A guy being involved is different. That is my job, and if she is seeking another man, then she isn't satisfied with me - which becomes a problem with the marriage
unless you're a guy who is into seeing his wife banged by another guy. I'm not.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:27 pm
by Hizzy III
I'm a pretty meat-N-potatoes guy and yet I tend to agree with eCat when it comes to the woman-on-woman thing. It's one thing if there's some real intimate feelings going on between the two, but otherwise...
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:29 pm
by TheBigMook
BigRedMan wrote:Eatin' ain't cheatin'
Dats what Arnie says.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:41 pm
by DooKSucks
What the fuck? It came up as "Annie's Ice Cream."
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:51 pm
by eCat
DooKSucks wrote:
What the fuck? It came up as "Annie's Ice Cream."
I know! isn't that fucked up. I saw it on tosh.0
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 1:59 pm
by eCat
btw,
as you guys buy Hi Def stuff and what not, don't buy your HDMI cables, Flatscreen TV mounts, ethernet cables, splitters - any of that kind of stuff locally
order it from monoprice.com - they have great prices. cables are like 70% cheaper than wal-mart. TV mounts are like $20 and other electronics are just as cheap.
they don't sell tv's or dvd's, just the shit you'd buy in the accessory section of the the electronics store or from Radio Shack.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:04 pm
by AlabamAlum
A guy being involved is different. That is my job, and if she is seeking another man, then she isn't satisfied with me - which become a problem with the marriage
Just hope she doesn't have the reciprocal view:
"A girl being involved is different. That is my job, and if he is seeking another woman, then he isn't satisfied with me - which becomes a problem with the marriage"
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:10 pm
by aTm
I typed in "theholocaustisalie" into google and a link to eCats post is the 9th match in my results.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:15 pm
by aTm
What you do is buy the most expensive cables and shit you can from the geek selling you the TV at best buy as long as he agrees to knock several hundred dollars off the price of your new big screen and then after you get the TV home, return all the cables and shit for a refund.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:24 pm
by eCat
AlabamAlum wrote: A guy being involved is different. That is my job, and if she is seeking another man, then she isn't satisfied with me - which become a problem with the marriage
Just hope she doesn't have the reciprocal view:
"A girl being involved is different. That is my job, and if he is seeking another woman, then he isn't satisfied with me - which becomes a problem with the marriage"
that doesn't quite fit the narrative given I am not seeking anyone other than her.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:38 pm
by CAT
eCat wrote:I getting a vibe here that Cat isn't into lesbian porn.
A HUGE vibe!!!! yuk yuk--probably the same feeling you would have about man/man porn
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:43 pm
by eCat
man/man porn
heh...like that even exists.
but you know what they say
[youtube]Pi7gwX7rjOw[/youtube]
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:44 pm
by Jungle Rat
That's disgusting.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:52 pm
by AlabamAlum
eCat wrote:AlabamAlum wrote: A guy being involved is different. That is my job, and if she is seeking another man, then she isn't satisfied with me - which become a problem with the marriage
Just hope she doesn't have the reciprocal view:
"A girl being involved is different. That is my job, and if he is seeking another woman, then he isn't satisfied with me - which becomes a problem with the marriage"
that doesn't quite fit the narrative given I am not seeking anyone other than her.
My bad. I thought you were angling for another girl in the bed.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:58 pm
by hedge
I liked the part of that video where they said the golden rule goes back to ancient Greece and one of the guys chimes in "Talkin' about Caesar"...
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:59 pm
by eCat
AlabamAlum wrote:
My bad. I thought you were angling for another girl in the bed.
well of course I am, goddamn man are you stupid? I'm just acting like I'm not because it has to be her idea
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:20 pm
by Saint
hedge wrote:Saint wrote:eCat wrote:you can also send it to me. I still have a VCR that I dump video onto my computer with.
Seriously? you can't fuck it up b/c it's the only copy I have. how much?
Goddamn, can't you even make another VCR copy before you send it you helpless sniveling idiot?
not everyone has 2 VCRs so they can make copies of '80s pornos, jackass