Page 159 of 332
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:39 pm
by eCat
I'm a few pages into that thread. Its fascinating that this guy has this overriding need for validation
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 1:36 am
by Saint
The best part of all of that was "Barnestormer"
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 1:37 am
by Saint
The Internets has showed me there's some crazy ass motherfuckers running around this planet.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 8:19 am
by bluetick
How long would it take to debunk the player/coach claims? 5 seconds?
Ah well, at least he wasn't ripping people off with some kid-with-cancer or wounded vet story.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:45 pm
by Cletus
aTm wrote:He kinda did, but before he knew how extensive it was. He claimed on one of the threads that he had been working on a frac site and hadn't been online for days but that he might've been hacked. I don't think he posted after he realized how deep people had already figured things out on other threads. He's been banned now.
Why ban him? This is the point when it starts to get good.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2015 3:55 pm
by eCat
yea I was kinda disappointed when I saw that too.
What I did see was that he was actively reading the thread because whenever someone found something, he'd go out and delete it.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:22 pm
by crashcourse
I'm so much cooler on line
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:25 pm
by Bklyn
Ironically, I'm much more so in person.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:44 pm
by Jungle Rat
I'm cool either way.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 4:31 pm
by Jungle Rat
Somebody needs to update the goatpen.net intro
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 4:50 pm
by aTm
Psht. Fuck the goat pen. I think we should try to have a WCP fantasy baseball draft on the forum.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:29 pm
by Jungle Rat
Fag
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 2:48 pm
by sardis
This is what is going to bug me about self-driving vehicles...
http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/25/technol ... index.html
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 3:43 pm
by 10ac
EFZ
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 3:54 pm
by 10ac
When measuring an aneurism, what does 4.2 AP x 4.7 Transverse x 5.8 SI mean?
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 4:20 pm
by crashcourse
anterior posterior 4.2 front too back
transvere--across
SI superior inferior--top to bottom
the one that conunts is AP--5 cm or more they might operate depending on pateint. 5.5 cm really ought to oerate
if non operative keep the blood pressure down
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 4:30 pm
by AlabamAlum
aP is Anterior -Posterior which is front-back. Transverse is across. SI, I believe, is ssuperior inferior, but you will also get a report that might mention SI as signal intensity - just don't get them swapped up. And this is usually reported in CM.
Who has an aneurysm and where is it?
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 4:30 pm
by AlabamAlum
Damn it, crash.
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 4:33 pm
by 10ac
Thnx!
Re: MIT Engineers
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 4:35 pm
by AlabamAlum
Abdominal?