The Goat Pen

bluetick wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 11:26 am https://heavy.com/news/2020/05/ahmaud-a ... o-georgia/

Bored GA rednecks shoot a black jogger for sport.

DooKSucks wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:31 pm I'm glad to see that IB is still a damn idiot.

eCat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 4:36 pm

bluetick wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 11:26 am https://heavy.com/news/2020/05/ahmaud-a ... o-georgia/

Bored GA rednecks shoot a black jogger for sport.

looks like he wasn't a jogger afterall, he was THE jogger

https://www.glynncounty.org/DocumentCen ... -of-Intent

references 9 and 10 are of particular interest.......

Now prosecutors have revealed the full scale of the mountain of evidence in the case, which stretches to within a stone's throw of three million pages.

A letter by U.S. attorney Audrey Strauss reads: "As the Court is aware, the Government has produced to the defendant more than 2.7 million pages of discovery pursuant to the Government's various discovery obligations."

The revelation emerged as the prosecution objected to a subpoena submitted by Maxwell's lawyers to Boies Schiller Flexner (BSF), the law firm that represents Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre and a number of other Epstein victims.

DooKSucks wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 3:46 pm First, you're a fucking dumbass

Second, that's far from being obscene in a federal case, any type of complicated financial case or major tort case. This case involves:
1) sophisticated financial mogul
2) dozens of victims
3) multiple locations (national and international)
4) multiple investigative files from local, state and federal officials
5) data dumps from several electronic devices
So, no, 2.7m pages of discovery does not make me bat an eyelid. I have seen multiple instances in which case files were so large that firms have used moving/storage companies bring the firm's file to the courthouse, and that's just in eastern NC. I am sure it's a daily occurrence in NYC.

Third, there is an industry dedicated to this very issue. You get a contractor who hires young, unemployed law school grads with JD's to do "document review." You then have a supervising attorney watch over this.

Jungle Rat wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 6:08 pm ORDER IN THE COURT!!

innocentbystander wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:07 pm

DooKSucks wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 3:46 pm First, you're a fucking dumbass

Second, that's far from being obscene in a federal case, any type of complicated financial case or major tort case. This case involves:
1) sophisticated financial mogul
2) dozens of victims
3) multiple locations (national and international)
4) multiple investigative files from local, state and federal officials
5) data dumps from several electronic devices
So, no, 2.7m pages of discovery does not make me bat an eyelid. I have seen multiple instances in which case files were so large that firms have used moving/storage companies bring the firm's file to the courthouse, and that's just in eastern NC. I am sure it's a daily occurrence in NYC.

Third, there is an industry dedicated to this very issue. You get a contractor who hires young, unemployed law school grads with JD's to do "document review." You then have a supervising attorney watch over this.

I almost stopped reading after your first comment that I KNOW you added just because you and I differ politically and that is the only way you think you can compare our dick size on a public forum. So shame on you. But I am not surprised. You are immature, counsellor.

Having said that, you didn't answer the question. How many billable hours are we talking? If you are the supervising attorney and you are acting as "project manager" over these young, unemployed, law school grads doing the "document review", what do you have them review (exactly) and how many of them do you need for 2.7 million pages of discovery? Give me math, not rhetoric counsellor.

The Ghislaine Maxwell case is far more interesting than politics. This is the single largest sex trafficking case in world history. And it happened right here in our back yard. This could give us all hours, days worth of interesting discussion. I did not insult you. Insulting me to give yourself an erection on this thread (to try and impress everyone else the way a homosexual wears flamboyant colored shirts to peacock himself at the gay club), does not lend itself towards having interesting discussion on this case. Try not to do that again, counsellor.

DooKSucks wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:37 am

innocentbystander wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:07 pm

DooKSucks wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 3:46 pm First, you're a fucking dumbass

Second, that's far from being obscene in a federal case, any type of complicated financial case or major tort case. This case involves:
1) sophisticated financial mogul
2) dozens of victims
3) multiple locations (national and international)
4) multiple investigative files from local, state and federal officials
5) data dumps from several electronic devices
So, no, 2.7m pages of discovery does not make me bat an eyelid. I have seen multiple instances in which case files were so large that firms have used moving/storage companies bring the firm's file to the courthouse, and that's just in eastern NC. I am sure it's a daily occurrence in NYC.

Third, there is an industry dedicated to this very issue. You get a contractor who hires young, unemployed law school grads with JD's to do "document review." You then have a supervising attorney watch over this.

I almost stopped reading after your first comment that I KNOW you added just because you and I differ politically and that is the only way you think you can compare our dick size on a public forum. So shame on you. But I am not surprised. You are immature, counsellor.

Having said that, you didn't answer the question. How many billable hours are we talking? If you are the supervising attorney and you are acting as "project manager" over these young, unemployed, law school grads doing the "document review", what do you have them review (exactly) and how many of them do you need for 2.7 million pages of discovery? Give me math, not rhetoric counsellor.

The Ghislaine Maxwell case is far more interesting than politics. This is the single largest sex trafficking case in world history. And it happened right here in our back yard. This could give us all hours, days worth of interesting discussion. I did not insult you. Insulting me to give yourself an erection on this thread (to try and impress everyone else the way a homosexual wears flamboyant colored shirts to peacock himself at the gay club), does not lend itself towards having interesting discussion on this case. Try not to do that again, counsellor.

No. I am close friends with several conservative Republicans and many former conservatives who are now "Trumpers." I just happen to think you are a fucking imbecile.

Jungle Rat wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:47 am Dude. We tuned him out years ago. He's just a cute chubby home boy with a lot of cousins with connections