Page 156 of 332

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 4:52 pm
by bluetick
Driver-less cars are going to change our way of life in ways many have not considered. Losers will be Toyota, Honda, and the Big American Three...as well as State Farm, Allstate...Hertz and Avis...body shops and parking garages...taxis and long haul truckers. An interesting read:

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/technolo ... id=U142DHP

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:00 am
by hedge
If all those people lose, who wins?

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:03 am
by AlabamAlum
The lazy public who can't be troubled to drive, and the people who have to drive on roads with drivers so bad that a drunk monkey with Parkinson's would be a better at staying in their lanes.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:04 am
by hedge
Yeah, but if several entire industries are crushed, I doubt it's worth it...

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:20 am
by AlabamAlum
Fuck industry. I want to drive in safety.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:24 am
by hedge
Have you ever been in an automobile accident?

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:27 am
by AlabamAlum
Yes. I was hit from behind once.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:46 am
by eCat
I wonder if driver less cars will adapt the personalities of their owners?

Like will the Asian ones drive really bad and not stay in their lane? Will Senior Citizens cars drive really slow on their way to get their senior discount cup of coffee during morning rush hour?

Damn, I always figured that was Buck Rogers shit. I'll still be in my 50's when he says that will happen. I can't wait to park my ass in the back seat and punch in the gps to get to wherever I'm going.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 10:48 am
by 10ac
The important question is, will it count as a designated driver?

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 11:33 am
by bluetick
DUI, all moving violations, checkpoints - will be a footnote in history. Traffic tie-ups, too (even ATL..just imagine). No need for seatbelts. Tinted glass and anything goes. (Sadly, my first thought was binge-watching SoA or similar)

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 11:49 am
by hedge
Just another step in SkyNet's plan. This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper...

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:28 pm
by eCat
isn't there some law that says you have to get all your tax documents by Jan 31?

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:46 pm
by aTm
They have to put it in the mail by Feb 2 this year for most things or Feb 17th for some others.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:48 pm
by eCat
oh...for some reason I thought I had to get everything by the end of Jan.

oh well....its not like I"ve done my taxes. I just keep getting shit every day that I don't expect.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 6:15 pm
by Cletus
aTm wrote:They have to put it in the mail by Feb 2 this year for most things or Feb 17th for some others.
Who is "they" because every year I'm waiting until well after April 15th to get some my K1's.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 6:52 pm
by aTm
Not K1's from corporations or partnerships, since those come out after that entity does its own taxes, but various flavors of 1099s and 1098s and Ws.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 8:10 pm
by Jungle Rat
Who pays taxes these days. Sheesh

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 8:23 pm
by sardis
1099s and W-2s should be sent to recipients by now, but the fed copies don't have to be sent until a month later so sometimes the forms are sent out to individuals late.

Cletus, you need to stay away from hedge fund investments.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 8:55 pm
by AlabamAlum
Why?

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 10:11 pm
by sardis
They are usually the K-1s that are filed later because they themselves have to wait on K-1s from other funds.