The Goat Pen

You couldn't wait to use that "multiple" as soon as he finally got his second one, could you?

we've seen this show before

but brady is 40 and didn't throw very well last night

their defense looked like shit

good win for Kansas city

hedge wrote:You couldn't wait to use that "multiple" as soon as he finally got his second one, could you?

That party is still going on...

if you are giving Pey-Pey the 'credit' for the Broncos' Super Bowl win, you clearly didn't watch the game....


5....hmmm.....would you rather have 5 regular season MVPs....or 5 Super Bowl rings?
I'll side with postseason success over regular-season stats.

dave_rickart wrote: I'll side with postseason success over regular-season stats.

No kidding. As a deadskin fan, you'd hump a week-old corpse just to get a whiff of post-season success.

bluetick wrote:

dave_rickart wrote: I'll side with postseason success over regular-season stats.

No kidding. As a deadskin fan, you'd hump a week-old corpse just to get a whiff of post-season success.

Now now. They did have success. When a young Dave was first using dial up on Compuserve to get doctored photos of Joe Theisman in his underwear to gawk at.....but then his beeper would go off and he would have to go upstairs to eat dinner with his parents.

yes, I have watched my team win mutiple Super Bowls.

BRM?

bluetick wrote:Vagina/Deadskin-Dave, keeper of the Tom Brady flame. Will forever hound Peyton for only winning 5 league MYPs and multiple SBs.

The real hatred should be for Aaron Rogers. Arguably the second most talented QB of this era and only 1 Superbowl with plenty of skill players and adequate defense. You kidding me? If he doesn't win at least one more his career will have been a huge flop imo.

dave_rickart wrote:yes, I have watched my team win mutiple Super Bowls.

BRM?

No shame to admit I follow 2 teams. So yes, I've seen my share of Super Bowls with the Cowboys and 1 with the Colts.

Pitiful. Is your other username 'DookSucks'?

Last I checked, the Cowgirls aren't in Indiana.

Oh for fuck's sake. You re-hash this shit every time and think you are so profound. I started following the Cowboys in 1980-81 before the Colts moved to Indy. So thus, I will root for two teams. It is not uncommon to follow a team when you were a kid, move to different city and become a fan of that team. Just stop that nonsense and try to be original and funny.

Speaking of funny, nice win by the Hoosiers this weekend, don't you think????

hoosiers with the nice win

colts looked absolutely abysmal

what a shitstain of a game against a team that's predicted to suck

pogano may verywell be the first coach fired this year

That would have been a heartwarming analogy if, say, you had actually moved to the Dallas-Fort Worth area as a kid and picked up rooting for the home team....

have no idea how that related to your actual 'life', but at least the Cowgirls' bandwagon had room for you before DS and his fat girlfriends jumped aboard.

You are such a douche wagon.

So yeah by all accounts unless you lived around the area at some point in your life, you have no right to root for that team?

Well no thanks Comrade Rickart. This is America and we root for damn well who we please!!!

I thought rickert had two teams that he pulled for in some sport?

FSU and Vagina.

hedge wrote:I thought rickert had two teams that he pulled for in some sport?

Seems to be a big fan of New England (always flapping his mouth when they win) and the Deadskins.

Someone should check his papers...

http://nypost.com/2017/09/12/espn-sidel ... -football/

yeah listening to that dribble I thought espn was doing the "make a wish" for terminally ill reporters

bluetick wrote:

dave_rickart wrote: I'll side with postseason success over regular-season stats.

No kidding. As a deadskin fan, you'd hump a week-old corpse just to get a whiff of post-season success.

He has seen three super bowl wins, which is two more championships than UT football has produced in your lifetime..