Page 154 of 756

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:28 am
by hedge
So you opted for a siesta rather than a fiesta? Andele, motherfucker!

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:00 pm
by Bklyn
Andele's "19" album is pretty good, but "21" is definitely better.

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:53 pm
by Jungle Rat
Image

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:32 pm
by crashcourse
the over under for punts is 11 next monday

3 and outs the over under is 8

some good exciting field position battles that will keep america on the edge of her seat!!!

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:39 pm
by AlabamAlum
You either love defense or you hate America. Which is it, comrade?

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:22 pm
by crashcourse
I find that offensive. Much more offensive then I will find monday night

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:31 pm
by aTm
Are teams that have announced conference moves undefeated this bowl season? I know A&M, Missouri, TCU, Houston, and Boise all won. SMU and Pitt play each other so I guess someone will lose there and WVU plays tonight, is that accurate?

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:18 pm
by TheBigMook
San Diego State lost their bowl game. Easy to forget, since the game was weeks ago... and becuase its re-goddamned-diculous that they would be joining the Big East.

Re: College Football

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:01 pm
by Jungle Rat
College football isn't over yet?

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:32 am
by hedge
It is for Clemson, for this year at least. Not sure what the over/under was on this game, but I believe it's done gone over...

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:20 am
by Hizzy III
Even if you take away WVU's three touchdowns off of turnovers, Clemson's defense has given up 49 points.

C'mon, man. WVU"s offense is not that good and Clemson's defensive talent isn't quite that bad.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:25 am
by Saint
The ACC should ask C-USA for a merger

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:34 am
by Fifer
College football is a chaotic mess. This bowl system is beyond assine. It's never been a fair game. Attendance and TV ratings are falling. Most schools lose millions. If the NCAA doesn't do something soon the game is going to fall apart.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:12 am
by eCat
btw, not sure if it's been posted here but the Cat/Dog analogy coach from Coastal Carolina (or wherever) was let go a couple of months after his famous rant.

If he wasn't high or drunk when he did that rant, you can't let a coach like that go. He'll do more to put you on the map than wins will.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:30 am
by Bklyn
I saw it. He looked sober...just insane.

It still isn't as classic as "I'm a man. I'm 40!"

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:53 pm
by Fifer
Both Clemson and WV lose a mill of taxpayer money. How much longer is this mess going to go on.


http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/01/04/or ... -relevant/

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:59 pm
by Owlman
The champion of the Big 8 (12) used to automatically go to the Orange Bowl. How did they lose that traditional team to end of with the ACC and Big East?

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:18 pm
by aTm
Coastal Carolina hired the rich investment banker guy that's been trying to break into coaching the last few years.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:03 pm
by Hizzy III
Owlman wrote:The champion of the Big 8 (12) used to automatically go to the Orange Bowl. How did they lose that traditional team to end of with the ACC and Big East?
They don't necessarily do it based on conference tie-ins anymore. Because the BCS title game rotates amongst the sites of the Rose, Orange, Sugar and Fiesta Bowls (while allowing each bowl to go forward as usual), there's often a chance that the traditional tie-ins (read: conference champions) are involved in the title game, meaning that a secondary matchup is needed. The BCS decided to rotate "first" choice of the also-rans among the other bowl sites. So, if the Rose Bowl is the site of the BCS title game and USC is one of the title game contenders, the Fiesta Bowl might have the first choice of the next highest ranked BCS team (Texas or Ohio State, for example).

As you'll recall, the Sugar is normally the SEC champ but both LSU and Alabama are in the title game, so you end up with Michigan and Va Tech instead. The Fiesta Bowl had the first choice of the best available BCS school, and that was Okie State. In years past, Okie State would have been in the Orange Bowl. Now, the Big 12 winner is often in the Fiesta Bowl.

Re: College Football

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:47 pm
by hedge
"The ACC should ask C-USA for a merger"

B/c it would be embarrassing to get snubbed by C-USA...