The Goat Pen

I'm thinking something more like this gal...

[img2]http://l2.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/gLUHg ... 887_vk.jpg[/img2]

Or the neighbor in Something About Mary...

bluetick wrote:FTR, I ain't white, I'm bronze. George Hamilton only wishes he was this dark. I can absolutely relate to people of color.

So there.

Liar, yer orange, just like DJT.

bluetick wrote:I'm not the board, but there was no national sackcloth request that I can recall and I'm not interested in looking up Dem comments on the GOP baseball shooting. I'm sure Pelosi and Schumer's words were in line with everybody else's.

False equivalencies aside, I'm watching Trump giving a good speech re: Charlottesville. He's reading off the teleprompter but he's hitting all the right notes and naming the right bad actors in his do-over. Sounds presidential. Two thumbs up.

He should have delivered these same remarks last Saturday but held back for reasons highly suspicious to even members of his own party.

It's not presidential when you have to be convinced to condemn Nazis and the KKK two days after the fact. The time to be presidential was on Saturday. Of course, to true believers like Prof and Crash, standing up for rather than against the white supremacists was the presidential moment. Gotta see both sides, right?

There you go again, opening your pie hole in a discussion about social issues. You are a white male. That makes you a racist. The scum of the earth. The source of all evil. The plague of all humanity. A major source of climate change.

People like you should retreat to your safe space and spend the rest of your days in silent penitence for all the unsustainability you have caused to society.

Robert Mueller is a white male and thereby a racist as well, so prof surely has no issues with the goings on wrt the special counsel. heh

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/ ... corruption

Sorry, it's lengthy and doesn't have many pictures. The article does have the WH shaking like a shitting dog, however.

Finally, the smoking gun!

bluetick wrote:Robert Mueller is a white male and thereby a racist as well, so prof surely has no issues with the goings on wrt the special counsel. heh

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/ ... corruption

Sorry, it's lengthy and doesn't have many pictures. The article does have the WH shaking like a shitting dog, however.

That's an interesting read. I suspect he's going to get in some trouble for all this. But, since guys like Prof, Sardis, and Crash don't seem to have a problem with Trump reviving the Nazi party, I doubt being tangentially involved in a former Soviet republic money laundering scheme is going to ruffle their feathers.

Any reasonable person knows this is a big nothing. No different than oil companies dealing with the likes of Venezuela and Libya or google and Apple dealing with the Chinese government.

" That makes you a racist. The scum of the earth. The source of all evil. The plague of all humanity."

We criticize in others what we most dislike about ourselves...

sad that Cletus can only resort to kindergarden tactics for lack of any intellectual response

Let's hear Trump's intellectual response to any issue before we scold others on that point...

trump isn't the one calling me a nazi

sardis wrote:Any reasonable person knows this is a big nothing. No different than oil companies dealing with the likes of Venezuela and Libya or google and Apple dealing with the Chinese government.

If google and Apple were laundering money, I think a reasonable person would be appalled. Booming companies with no history of bankruptcies or troubles getting financing (ahem)- why would robust companies like these resort to those kind of schemes in order to gain fast cash from disreputable sources? You gotta think they wouldn't... ..

bluetick wrote:Robert Mueller is a white male and thereby a racist as well, so prof surely has no issues with the goings on wrt the special counsel. heh

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/ ... corruption

Sorry, it's lengthy and doesn't have many pictures. The article does have the WH shaking like a shitting dog, however.

Yes! This is it! This is going to be what brings Trump down, THIS TIME!!! Get ready, Wiley Coyote...

crashcourse wrote:trump isn't the one calling me a nazi

Actually he said you and a couple others had no problem with Trump reviving the Nazi party. Not the same.

It'd be like saying you're okay with cockfighting. Doesn't mean you're a cock, necessarily.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... id=U142DHP

You gotta think that twitter is the main reason trump is at 34/61, right?

Professor Tiger wrote:

bluetick wrote:Robert Mueller is a white male and thereby a racist as well, so prof surely has no issues with the goings on wrt the special counsel. heh

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/ ... corruption

Sorry, it's lengthy and doesn't have many pictures. The article does have the WH shaking like a shitting dog, however.

Yes! This is it! This is going to be what brings Trump down, THIS TIME!!! Get ready, Wiley Coyote...

It's like they say - even the best sarcasm is merely average. You need to leave it alone..as a service to all. Thanks! ..in advance!!

crashcourse wrote:trump isn't the one calling me a nazi

Apparently you didn't get the memo either. So I'll summarize. Liberals calling conservatives "nazis" as well as "racists" and "sexists" and "bigots" and "homophobes" and all the other parrot utterances are just used to make conservatives shut up, run away, and end the discussion without real debate.

That was back when those words had real meanings. Those days are now over. Today, the definitions of words like "racist" and "sexist" and "sexist" are all meaningless. Today those words mean, "anything that liberals don't like." I.e.,

A conservative says, "I love my country," and a liberal will call him a nazi/KKK/racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobe/etc etc etc. A conservative says, "I don't like it when the NORK's and the Iranians make nuclear missiles and aim them at us," and a liberal will call him a nazi/KKK/racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobe/etc etc etc.
A conservative will say, "I voted for Trump," and a liberal will call him a nazi/KKK/racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobe/etc etc etc.
A conservative will say, "I think we should enforce immigration laws," and a liberal will call him a nazi/KKK/racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobe/etc etc etc...
A conservative will say, "I think we should repeal and replace Obamacare," and a liberal will call him a nazi/KKK/racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobe/etc etc etc.

So when some lady part liberal calls you a nazi/KKK/racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobe/etc etc etc, simply ignore it. Recognize that this is a fraudulent tactic that liberals use because they are too intellectually bankrupt and lazy to engage in a real debate. Also recognize that, unfortunately, calling anybody who disagrees with them nazi/KKK/racist/sexist/bigoted/homophobe/etc etc etc HAS WORKED for decades. It has sent conservatives running like scalded cats for far too long. So the solution is stop running like scalded cats. See this tactic as the bogus scam it is. Don't take the bait. Keep expressing your conservative beliefs despite their attempts to shut you up and preserve their safe space. The scam only works if you let it.

bluetick wrote:

crashcourse wrote:trump isn't the one calling me a nazi

Actually he said you and a couple others had no problem with Trump reviving the Nazi party. Not the same.

It'd be like saying you're okay with cockfighting. Doesn't mean you're a cock, necessarily.

no he says anybody supporting trump is a Nazi supporter theres about 5 posts that reference that with PT myself and sardis

that's why its really pointless to have a discussion with somebody that close minded kind of like talking to the antifa