The Goat Pen

What the DNC did to Bernie is the real, provan, actual case of collusion in the last election that really did attack our democratic institutions. Funny how nobody wants to talk about that. At all.

Professor Tiger wrote:What the DNC did to Bernie is the real, provan, actual case of collusion in the last election that really did attack our democratic institutions. Funny how nobody wants to talk about that. At all.

Let's talk about it. There were leaks that implicated Wasserman Schultz in a nefarious scheme - sound familiar? - when further investigation revealed she ginned up debate schedules and the like, she was roundly criticized by her own party and got the axe.

In case you glossed over that last part, I say again: the DNC Chair was roundly criticized by her own party, and she was summarily shown the door. Found out, forced out; justice served. A cautionary tale in light of these turbulent times.

To better put in perspective, the DNC Chair was caught scheduling debates that benefited Hillary's older audience over Bernie's younger crowd. Forced to resign.

Whereas the RNC chair inexplicably changed the GOP platform with regards to the Ukraine at the convention, favoring Russian interests while downgrading our defense of Ukraine sovereignty, with the backdrop of possible oligarch millions involved in the process. Promoted to WH Chief of Staff.

bluetick wrote:To better put in perspective, the DNC Chair was caught scheduling debates that benefited Hillary's older audience over Bernie's younger crowd. Forced to resign.

Exactly. What she did was she cheated and (perhaps) it was criminal. She did what she did because the feminist imperative commanded of her that she use whatever DNC authority she thought she had to alter an election, undermine Bernie Sanders, and prohibit a man from politically defeating a woman. She'll be lucky if what she did doesn't land her ass in prison.

bluetick wrote:Whereas the RNC chair inexplicably changed the GOP platform with regards to the Ukraine at the convention, favoring Russian interests while downgrading our defense of Ukraine sovereignty, with the backdrop of possible oligarch millions involved in the process. Promoted to WH Chief of Staff.

So what? None of this is criminal. The RNC chair is NOT bound by any understandings of any current GOP political platform. The only interests he need serve are the interests of the President and the American people. Fuck the GOP platform and let Ukraine fend for itself.

There is no way you can compare these two people. One may be (almost certainly is) a criminal feminist cvnt who most likely broke both federal and campaign laws, the other, a thoughtful decent man, who is a deep thinker trying to help his country.

Was it your mother who did this to you?

There was another DNC Chair - Donna Brazile - who leaked debate questions to the Clinton Camp. Both she and DWS undermined our democratic process as surely as if they had shredded Bernie votes in a shredder. If their names ended in -ovich there would be a special counsel and jail time involved.

Lemme try something else prof can relate to.

Intramural sports at Awbarn may be dirty as all get out, but nobody gives a flip except for those directly involved in the intramurals. It's when varsity players are being bought with mountains of Dye bucks...that's the kind of thing that gets universal attention.

God I hope I don't have to use crayons.

Your analogy was.... how should I say.... cute? Perhaps you should leave those to us trained professionals.

Professor Tiger wrote:Maybe you should stop trying analogies. Leave that to us trained professionals.

Liberals are forced to use analogies to protect their people when something so egregious has happened. That is how they shift the narrative and reframe the argument. This is Rules for Radicals 101.

Bottom line, neither Donna Brazille nor that b1tch DWS think they did anything wrong. They both feel perfectly vindicated and moral in their actions. And they will never testify under oath about what happened, they will channel Lois Learner and take the old 5th Amendment. And people like tick will simply shrug their shoulders and say, lets move on....

IB, you overplayed your hand today with this mysogi-doofus act of yours. Give it up, dude. Stick to your other sites, where you're more convincing as a repentant pedo-priest, or a nympho debutante. Fucking troll.

bluetick wrote:IB, you overplayed your hand today with this mysogi-doofus act of yours.

You are gravely mistaken. Here let me help you out...

I love women.

I hate feminism.

feminism != women

The fact that you can't understand that, that you foolishly equate two completely different things, does NOT make me a misogynist. It just means you have been brainwashed by feminism. I can't say that I am all that surprised.

Professor Tiger wrote:Your analogy was.... how should I say.... cute?

Thanks, I agree the intramural analogy was really inspired stuff.

However, the part about Dye Bucks was a tad dickish, so here's an article that should make amends. Apparently your president has acted presidential for a day and a half.

Trump Saudi Arabia Speech Statesmanlike - National Review http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447832/
never said those 3 key words, though

National Review hates Trump as much as liberals do.

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.national ... ent-menace

Pretty prescient, actually:

"Trump is a philosophically unmoored political opportunist who would trash the broad conservative ideological consensus within the GOP in favor of a free-floating populism with strong-man overtones."

I wonder how much their tone has changed since he won?

It's the bitches fault. Always

Cletus wrote:I wonder how much their tone has changed since he won?

Not much at all. Just last week:

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/44 ... tjobrussia

Just like George Will recently joined MSNBC.

https://www.google.com/amp/thehill.com/ ... port%3Famp

Never-Trump Republicans and the Trump Derangement Syndrome Democrats are now on the same team.

Professor Tiger wrote:

Cletus wrote:I wonder how much their tone has changed since he won?

Not much at all. Just like George Will recently joined MSNBC. The never-Trump Republicans and the Trump Derangement Syndrome Democrats are on the same team.

You were Will's biggest fan. The Thinking Man's Conservative, you said. Hell, you linked every article the man ever wrote, especially if he was dogging oprama over x, y, or z. "Peace be upon him" was your signature salutation for the guy for chrisakes.

To think you threw Will over for this intellectually bankrupt orange freak-azoid is mind-bending.

You were Lane Kiffin's biggest fan at one time, predicting great events/epochs for the orange/freakazoid/checkerboarders, what's yer point?

Incorrect. I like Will. He's still my favorite talking head. I just disagree with him on his never-Trump position. That he would go over to MSNBC boggles MY mind. That's like Rachel Maddow joining infowars.

George Will: peace be upon him most of the time.