Page 14 of 467

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:08 am
by Jungle Rat
Is this the Dungeons and Dragons forum?

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:08 am
by AugustWest
well, she's supposed to be a whore.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:12 am
by AugustWest
I dont think Snow is a Targaryeon. I'd have to re-read the chapter where Ned is going through the book of the great houses but I'm pretty sure all of the Targaryeon's have white hair. I think it's more likly that he's the issue of Robert and Ned's sister.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:26 am
by TheBigMook
He's Rhaeger and Ned's sister's child. He's a Jon Snow, Aegon Snow. The question is who is the 3rd head of the dragon? For some reason I think its going to be Tyrion. Don't know if he is also going to have Targaryan blood as well may explain the mismatched eyes in the book and give greater reason why Tywin hates him so much) perhaps he's the Mad King's bastard with Tywin's wife.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:57 am
by hedge
"on a far more interesting note, apparently the actress who played Tyrion's tentwhore Shae has done a lot of hardcore pornos."

They're cashing in on the porn star to mainstream route paved most recently by Sasha Grey in Entourage...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:14 am
by aTm
Man you gusy are just throwing the spoilers out even if it is just "fan speculation". I think its pretty clear what his parentage is from the books. If anybody is only watching the show, then they havent even gotten the big "possible hint" that it might not be Ned's kid, only that we dont know who the mother is.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:50 am
by TheBigMook
All the most obvious "hints" were there in the first book, perhaps they didn' have those spoilers in the show, even though it coincides with the first book.

In the first book the author hits hard on how no one knows who the mother is even though there are numerous theories. Then they keep having Ned remember how he promised Lyssa without ever saying what he promised. Also in the first book he recalls his battle at the Tower of Joy. It was him and his seven vs three of the Kingsguard. Yet at the end of the battle Lyssa was dead. That makes no sense, neither of those groups would have killed her. Clearly she died in childbirth.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:00 pm
by Jungle Rat
[youtube]GszTBVn_SEI[/youtube]

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:31 pm
by TheBigMook
aTm wrote:Flow chart-Will character survive this film/series?

1)Is character played by Sean Bean ? ----------------------------------------Yes-----------------------------------------> No, he dies.
http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b247126 ... topstories

FYP:

Flow chart-Will actor survive?

1)Is actor Sean Bean ? ----------------------------------------Yes-----------------------------------------> Probably not.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:58 pm
by hedge
"All the most obvious "hints" were there in the first book, perhaps they didn' have those spoilers in the show, even though it coincides with the first book."

Here's a hint: You're gay...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:57 pm
by Bklyn
Despite his wounds, Bean refused any medical attention and opted not to go to a hospital.
Careful, that's the attitude that got Khal Drogo all fucked up...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:18 pm
by TheBigMook
hedge wrote:"All the most obvious "hints" were there in the first book, perhaps they didn' have those spoilers in the show, even though it coincides with the first book."

Here's a hint: You're gay...

Here's a hint: Go fuck yourself.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:28 pm
by Saint
I thought all the Targaryeons in the book were said to have silver hair.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:31 pm
by TheBigMook
He takes after his mother. Unlike the Baratheons, I don't believe the Targs are explicitly stated as always siring kids with that color hair, etc. The products of incest of course would keep the same traits but I don't think the non incest ones necessarily do.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:33 pm
by Saint
Except when magic comes into the equation, khaleesi

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:47 pm
by TheBigMook
As you wish, Unsullied One.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:25 pm
by T Dot O Dot
All that said...

until the ink officially dries & the secret is published no one can say 100% who the parents are

Martin has left himself enough wiggle room to maneuver it whichever way he pleases. Me personally, I'd wager that after catching wind that all the fanboys & fangirls are claiming Rhaegar & the stark girl as a matter-of-fact.... I'd flip the script and go a different route.

I just think it's funny you are claiming truth to this. At most, I've only ever seen a fansite lean heavily in one direction or the other.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:36 pm
by aTm
Based on a few facts I think its likely that Jon Snow is intended to be the a play on the stereotypical "Fantasy-hero-who-does-not-know-he-is-actually-the-heir-to-the-throne." It also seems like the thing Martin would do, have that character and then write it so that he never actually finds out about it.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:38 pm
by aTm
In the books, I'm not sure the Baratheons are "always" dark haired. Robert's bastards certainly seem to be all dark haired, but when Ned goes through the geneology book in the novel he specifically looks up several instances where a dark headed Baratheon was married to a blonde headed Lannister, rather than TV NEd who just goes down a long line of dark haired Baratheons.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:45 pm
by aTm
There are a couple Targaryens in the Hedge Knight series of short stories by GRRM that don't have the typical silver haired look when they are are sons/daughter of a mixed marriage rather than a Targaryen/Targaryen incestual match.