Page 1261 of 1476

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:34 pm
by Professor Tiger
Jungle Rat wrote:Don't agree with Trump? You're fired. What a fucking joke. Welcome to your next 4 years idiots.
The acting AG WORKS for Trump. He told her to do something, and she did the opposite.

If someone works for you, but they not only don't do what you tell them to do, but instead do precisely the opposite of what you told them to do, on a very big matter, in public, that will get you fired from ANY job. That goes for Acting AG's and stockbrokers:

[youtube]gcNVoT8UhHQ[/youtube]

::hedge wrote: I wish you were the guy not selling webistics::

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:09 pm
by bluetick
Betsy Devos Plagiarized Answers to Senate Confirmation Questionnaire - CNN

lol

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:36 pm
by Cletus
of course she did

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 1:40 pm
by bluetick
May turn out to be her only legit qualification - "industrious purloiner of resource material"

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:41 pm
by crashcourse
so she answers 1400 questions on a questionnaire and supposedly 2 answers have wording similar to someone named gupta

heres one answer--in response to transgenders--"Every child deserves to attend school in a safe, supportive environment where they can learn, thrive, and grow," DeVos writes.
"Every child deserves to attend school in a safe, supportive environment that allows them to thrive and grow," Gupta wrote

1400 questions and that's the best you could come up with a generic answer no more damaging the 2 people saying their favorite ice cream was neopolitian -

gesus you guys are killing me

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:52 pm
by Professor Tiger
"The murderer was a caucasian male, in his 20's-30''s, average height, medium build, brown hair, wearing blue jeans and a t-shirt, and drove a Camry."

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2017 10:41 pm
by Professor Tiger
Gorsuch nominated for SCOTUS: excellent.

Other than the screwed up rollout of the new immigration policy, the Trump administration has been a conservative Hanukkah: a new gift every day.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:45 am
by bluetick
Trump is the gift that keeps on giving alright..

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 8:12 am
by Professor Tiger
Will the Dem's filibuster? Will the Republicans invoke the nuclear option?

If I were Schumer, I wouldn't filibuster this one. The GOP is replacing one conservative with another, and the balance on the court will remain the same. Save the filibuster for the real real battle if/when Trump replaces a Ginsburg or a Kennedy or a Breyer.

If/when that happens, in the immortal words of Keith Jackson, "Woa Nelly!"

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:05 pm
by bluetick
Professor Tiger wrote:Will the Dem's filibuster? Will the Republicans invoke the nuclear option?

If I were Schumer, I wouldn't filibuster this one. The GOP is replacing one conservative with another, and the balance on the court will remain the same. Save the filibuster for the real real battle if/when Trump replaces a Ginsburg or a Kennedy or a Breyer.
Heard that school of thought and agree.

Another sot: filibuster for the same reason the GOP blocked Garland; Trump's only going to be around a short time, let the successor pick (trouble with that is Pence would almost surely be next up).

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 1:49 pm
by Professor Tiger
RE: another sot, its proponents should pray to whatever god they believe in that Ginsburg and Kennedy (both in their '80's) and Breyer (78) outlive both Trump and Pence.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:08 pm
by hedge
They just have to live another 4 years....

Serious question: Were you OK with the senate repubs not giving a hearing to Garland? Would you have felt the same way if senate dems had done that to a repub president in that same situation?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:31 pm
by crashcourse
I think starting with GB 43 no one would get a judge through the last year unless they had control of the senate

prior to that the president gets his nominee thru no matter who controls congress

in the future forget your last year unless you control the senate

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:59 pm
by hedge
Do you think that's what the Founders had in mind when they drafted the rules for picking Sup Court justices?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:37 pm
by Cletus
crashcourse wrote:I think starting with GB 43 no one would get a judge through the last year unless they had control of the senate

prior to that the president gets his nominee thru no matter who controls congress

in the future forget your last year unless you control the senate
The President didn't necessarily get the nominee through but he did always get a deliberation and a vote. That standard seems to have changed. Maybe the Dems should make an additional adjustment and force a super majority to get any confirmations.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:46 pm
by 10ac
hedge wrote:Do you think that's what the Founders had in mind when they drafted the rules for picking Sup Court justices?
Evidently. Why else would they have required the Senate to have the final say?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 3:49 pm
by Cletus
10ac wrote:
hedge wrote:Do you think that's what the Founders had in mind when they drafted the rules for picking Sup Court justices?
Evidently. Why else would they have required the Senate to have the final say?
But, the Senate didn't have any say in the mater. They ignored it as if the nomination didn't happen. Pretty sure that's not what they meant by advise and consent.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:04 pm
by bluetick
Sweet fancy Moses. Trump and his press secretary have no clue who Frederick Douglass was.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:15 pm
by Cletus
bluetick wrote:Sweet fancy Moses. Trump and his press secretary have no clue who Frederick Douglass was.
Sean Spicer today said, after a bunch of incoherent rambling, "The contributions of Fredrick Douglass will become more and more." I'm not sure this is coherent either but my main takeaway is that he used the future tense to refer to the contributions of a guy that's been dead for over 100 years.

Also, please contrast the Black History Month speech given by noted bumbler George W Bush - https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives ... 212-3.html - and this insane, self indulgent nonsense from our sitting president (a link won't do for this bullshit)
Well, the election, it came out really well. Next time we’ll triple the number or quadruple it. We want to get it over 51, right? At least 51.

Well this is Black History Month, so this is our little breakfast, our little get-together. Hi Lynn, how are you? Just a few notes. During this month, we honor the tremendous history of African-Americans throughout our country. Throughout the world, if you really think about it, right? And their story is one of unimaginable sacrifice, hard work, and faith in America. I’ve gotten a real glimpse—during the campaign, I’d go around with Ben to a lot of different places I wasn’t so familiar with. They’re incredible people. And I want to thank Ben Carson, who’s gonna be heading up HUD. That’s a big job. That’s a job that’s not only housing, but it’s mind and spirit. Right, Ben? And you understand, nobody’s gonna be better than Ben.

Last month, we celebrated the life of Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., whose incredible example is unique in American history. You read all about Dr. Martin Luther King a week ago when somebody said I took the statue out of my office. It turned out that that was fake news. Fake news. The statue is cherished, it’s one of the favorite things in the—and we have some good ones. We have Lincoln, and we have Jefferson, and we have Dr. Martin Luther King. But they said the statue, the bust of Martin Luther King, was taken out of the office. And it was never even touched. So I think it was a disgrace, but that’s the way the press is. Very unfortunate.

I am very proud now that we have a museum on the National Mall where people can learn about Reverend King, so many other things. Frederick Douglass is an example of somebody who’s done an amazing job and is being recognized more and more, I noticed. Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, and millions more black Americans who made America what it is today. Big impact.

I’m proud to honor this heritage and will be honoring it more and more. The folks at the table in almost all cases have been great friends and supporters. Darrell—I met Darrell when he was defending me on television. And the people that were on the other side of the argument didn’t have a chance, right? And Paris has done an amazing job in a very hostile CNN community. He’s all by himself. You’ll have seven people, and Paris. And I’ll take Paris over the seven. But I don’t watch CNN, so I don’t get to see you as much as I used to. I don’t like watching fake news. But Fox has treated me very nice. Wherever Fox is, thank you.

We’re gonna need better schools and we need them soon. We need more jobs, we need better wages, a lot better wages. We’re gonna work very hard on the inner city. Ben is gonna be doing that, big league. That’s one of the big things that you’re gonna be looking at. We need safer communities and we’re going to do that with law enforcement. We’re gonna make it safe. We’re gonna make it much better than it is right now. Right now it’s terrible, and I saw you talking about it the other night, Paris, on something else that was really—you did a fantastic job the other night on a very unrelated show.

I’m ready to do my part, and I will say this: We’re gonna work together. This is a great group, this is a group that’s been so special to me. You really helped me a lot. If you remember I wasn’t going to do well with the African-American community, and after they heard me speaking and talking about the inner city and lots of other things, we ended up getting—and I won’t go into details—but we ended up getting substantially more than other candidates who had run in the past years. And now we’re gonna take that to new levels. I want to thank my television star over here—Omarosa’s actually a very nice person, nobody knows that. I don’t want to destroy her reputation but she’s a very good person, and she’s been helpful right from the beginning of the campaign, and I appreciate it. I really do. Very special.

So I want to thank everybody for being here.


Whenever we're done with this nightmare, four weeks or four years, we'll all have a much greater appreciation for the professionals who know how to do this job. Maybe draining the swamp and kicking out the establishment wasn't such a good idea.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:18 pm
by hedge
"Sweet fancy Moses. Trump and his press secretary have no clue who Frederick Douglass was."

I wouldn't have been surprised if he had said "You're doing a heckuva job, Brownie"...