Page 1257 of 1476
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:07 pm
by Professor Tiger
Hedge, why do you hate Dr. Martin Luther King? Especially today?
And are you going to D.C. to protest the illegitimate Trump inauguration?
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:03 pm
by Jungle Rat
He's a racist
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 8:18 pm
by puterbac
Lewis? True.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:57 pm
by Professor Tiger
Obama commutes the sentence of Bradley Manning.
So a soldier walking off his post in a combat zone and wandering over to the Taliban is now okay. The fact that his fellow soldiers died looking for him is of no consequence.
I'm assuming the reason for this presidential clemency is Bradley now thinks he's a woman. That makes him a hero nowadays.
Disgusting.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:14 pm
by Cletus
Professor Tiger wrote:Obama commutes the sentence of Bradley Manning.
So a soldier walking off his post in a combat zone and wandering over to the Taliban is now okay. The fact that his fellow soldiers died looking for him is of no consequence.
I'm assuming the reason for this presidential clemency is Bradley now thinks he's a woman. That makes him a hero nowadays.
Disgusting.
That's not what happened. Manning gave a bunch of classified documents to WikiLeaks.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:36 pm
by AlabamAlum
I think prof was confusing Manning and Bergdahl.
I'm shocked that someone of prof's caliber got the facts wrong. Shocked!
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 8:10 am
by Professor Tiger
Fair. Guilty.
I did confuse the two. My bad.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:18 am
by hedge
Don't beat yourself up, those names are virtually identical, they practically rhyme, anyone could've made that mistake...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2017 9:20 am
by BigRedMan
Just like your parents, Hedge.......
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:56 pm
by Professor Tiger
On the eve of the inauguration, I have mixed feelings. On the one hand, I am still concerned Trump's temperament will get us into an unnecessary trade war with China and an unnecessary shooting war with Russia. My fallout shelter is almost finished.
But on the plus side, it is fun watching the MSM and the Dem's freak out like this. I am particularly amused how the Left suddenly hates Russia. During the Cold War, the Russians invaded multiple countries, had NO freedom of the press, speech or religion, propagandized their schools, sent all their opposition to the gulags, etc. and the Left barely noticed.
Now, all of a sudden, the liberals despise Russia. I think the Left's hyperventilating about Russia comes from jealousy. They're thinking, "The Russians can't manipulate our elections, control the press, propagandize the schools, curtail free speech, and send opponents to the gulags! Only we liberals are allowed to manipulate our elections, control the press, propagandize the schools, curtail free speech, and send our opponents to the gulags!"
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:40 pm
by hedge
So your concern about a war with Russia is balanced out by your pleasure at watching the discomfort of liberals. How patriotic of you...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:42 pm
by AlabamAlum
He is a horrible person. Best not to stare at the prof too long. It might stare back.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:37 pm
by Professor Tiger
hedge wrote:So your concern about a war with Russia is balanced out by your pleasure at watching the discomfort of liberals. How patriotic of you...
Not balanced. More like a silver lining. Mushroom clouds are a bigger deal than watching snowflakes having their space spaces invaded.
I seldom agree with Charles Blow of the NYT, but in this case he makes some excellent points:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/opin ... inion&_r=0
Hiya, AA. What's up?
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:53 pm
by Cletus
Prof's real joy is over all the trouble brown people are about to have in this country. It's the ultimate expression of his religion.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 3:04 pm
by Professor Tiger
All the trouble brown people are about to have?
The GOP ran the House, the Senate, and SCOTUS under W. I don't recall any attempts to reinstate slavery, the poll tax, whites only water fountains, blacks going to the back of the bus, federally funding the KKK, and all the absurd paranoid conspiracy theories the Jesse Jacksons of the world keep prophesying, but never actually happen.
They won't under Trump either. Be of good cheer.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 3:21 pm
by Professor Tiger
AA, sounds like your current treatment is not working. You may want to try bumping up to this:
http://ka-hi.com/equine-laxative.html
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 3:57 pm
by Toemeesleather
The true temperament of the batshit crazy left is on full display for all to see, unfiltered by the MSM, like it usually is....any rights/laws/elections are invalid if we don't get our way.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 3:59 pm
by SnoodGator
This is particularly not true: "I am particularly amused how the Left suddenly hates Russia. During the Cold War, the Russians invaded multiple countries, had NO freedom of the press, speech or religion, propagandized their schools, sent all their opposition to the gulags, etc. and the Left barely noticed."
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:28 pm
by Professor Tiger
LBJ was the last Democrat that stood up to the communists. By the '80's, Ted Kennedy, secretly contacted the Soviets to convince them to help the Democrats and hurt POTUS Reagan.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:32 pm
by Toemeesleather
Picking his way through the Soviet archives that Boris Yeltsin had just thrown open, in 1991 Tim Sebastian, a reporter for the London Times, came across an arresting memorandum. Composed in 1983 by Victor Chebrikov, the top man at the KGB, the memorandum was addressed to Yuri Andropov, the top man in the entire USSR. The subject: Sen. Edward Kennedy.
“On 9-10 May of this year,” the May 14 memorandum explained, “Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow.” (Tunney was Kennedy’s law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) “The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.”
Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. “The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations,” the memorandum stated. “These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign.”
Kennedy made Andropov a couple of specific offers.
First he offered to visit Moscow. “The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.” Kennedy would help the Soviets deal with Reagan by telling them how to brush up their propaganda.
Then he offered to make it possible for Andropov to sit down for a few interviews on American television. “A direct appeal … to the American people will, without a doubt, attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country. … If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interviews. … The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.”
Kennedy would make certain the networks gave Andropov air time–and that they rigged the arrangement to look like honest journalism.
Kennedy’s motives? “Like other rational people,” the memorandum explained, “[Kennedy] is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations.” But that high-minded concern represented only one of Kennedy’s motives.
“Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988,” the memorandum continued. “Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president.”
Kennedy proved eager to deal with Andropov–the leader of the Soviet Union, a former director of the KGB and a principal mover in both the crushing of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution and the suppression of the 1968 Prague Spring–at least in part to advance his own political prospects.
In 1992, Tim Sebastian published a story about the memorandum in the London Times. Here in the U.S., Sebastian’s story received no attention. In his 2006 book, The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism, historian Paul Kengor reprinted the memorandum in full. “The media,” Kengor says, “ignored the revelation.”
“The document,” Kengor continues, “has stood the test of time. I scrutinized it more carefully than anything I’ve ever dealt with as a scholar. I showed the document to numerous authorities who deal with Soviet archival material. No one has debunked the memorandum or shown it to be a forgery. Kennedy’s office did not deny it.”
Why bring all this up now? No evidence exists that Andropov ever acted on the memorandum–within eight months, the Soviet leader would be dead–and now that Kennedy himself has died even many of the former senator’s opponents find themselves grieving. Yet precisely because Kennedy represented such a commanding figure–perhaps the most compelling liberal of our day–we need to consider his record in full.
Doing so, it turns out, requires pondering a document in the archives of the politburo.
When President Reagan chose to confront the Soviet Union, calling it the evil empire that it was, Sen. Edward Kennedy chose to offer aid and comfort to General Secretary Andropov. On the Cold War, the greatest issue of his lifetime, Kennedy got it wrong.