Page 1236 of 1476
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 12:45 pm
by 10ac
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 12:57 pm
by Professor Tiger
"It is a triumph of the forces, at home and abroad, of nativism, authoritarianism, misogyny and racism."
He forgot homophobia, Islamophobia, the KKK and the Nazis.
That was very insensitive and exclusionary of the author.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 1:11 pm
by bluetick
Professor Tiger wrote:"It is a triumph of the forces, at home and abroad, of nativism, authoritarianism, misogyny and racism."
He forgot homophobia, Islamophobia, the KKK and the Nazis.
That was very insensitive and exclusionary of the author.
So you are going to spend a couple of days mocking the people who think Trump is bad for the country, and then you're going to join them.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 1:15 pm
by bluetick
Professor Tiger wrote:
But after I get that out of my system, I'm going start building that bomb shelter. I still think Trump is a dangerous nut.
Aight.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 1:57 pm
by Professor Tiger
Hillary and Trump are both bad for the country. So I can mock both of them. That's why I voted for Johnson.
But if you want, I can get an early start on mocking Trump. I don't trust him with the nuclear codes. Right now he's tight with Putin, but Putin is nobody's friend. I can easily imagine him insulting Trump's small hands, and the thin-skinned Trump shooting down a MiG in retaliation. Then Putin invades the Baltics and we are in a Cuban Missile Crisis v. 2.0.
Or I can see the Chinese shooting down a spy plane near the Spratley Islands, and Trump lobs a cruise missile in retaliation. We wind up in a trade war with the Chinese, where they start dumping trillions of our t-bills on the world market, starting a Depression. Or they invade Taiwan.
Trump's temperament, inexperience and megalomania are dangerous.
How's that?
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:17 pm
by 10ac
It's going to be fun....
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 3:08 pm
by crashcourse
Did volmillion die for slivovitz OD?
impressive puter
trump--we will create millions of jobs
but are there millions who will get off their assess to fill those jobs
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 4:00 pm
by bluetick
Yep - there'll be new jobs galore. Wall-builders. Plus the new gubmint deportation staff.
And after the deportations, another 10-11 million jobs will open up. Across the fruited plain.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 4:07 pm
by Cletus
With Pence more or less in charge, we should see an uptick in gay conversion therapy centers, fetal funeral parlors, and creation museums. Jobs galore!
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:15 pm
by Professor Tiger
Trump has made a lot of Messianic promises. All the things he promised last night reminded me of Obama's acceptance speech when he said he was going to lower the sea levels.
Trump has committed to a lot of things, but he is going to be dismayed how few of them he will be able to accomplish. He won't be able to do something as simple as firing a single federal employee. That will be a rude shock for an autocratic businessman.
His deportation of 11 million illegals? Good luck with that. Ain't going to happen. Dead on arrival.
His banning of Muslims entering America? Even Scalia (Peace be upon him) would have, and Thomas will, laugh that one out of SCOTUS. It's patently absurd and grotesquely unconstitutional.
Repeal Obamacare? Maybe, but what are you going to replace it with? He has no idea.
Republicans (that is, what was once the Republican Party) has proven itself better at back-seat driving than governing for the past 20 years. Will Trump break that pattern? We'll see.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:39 pm
by Jungle Rat
We have no other choice
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:35 am
by Johnette's Daddy
Jungle Rat wrote:We have no other choice
Protests in Downtown Los Angeles and in Times Square.
Bless you racist, homophobic mysogynists. WE'RE seceding this time. Enjoy Oklahoma and West Virginia, bigots - and you can keep Detroit for your trouble.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:23 am
by puterbac
bluetick wrote:puterbac wrote: Go ahead and laugh but there are lots of folks out there who are voting Trump, but don't want to be harassed so they don't talk about it. I didn't put Trump sticker on wife's car for that very reason and I'm in East TN.
I've got some Woodford in the tail gate van either way.
Heh - harassed my ass. There aren't enough dems around here to field a baseball team, much less go around harassing anybody. That's rich. Your mind said 'embarrased' but your fingers got crossed up.
No, the car is fine. I bet you're checking on your 401k though..
I wasn't worried about harassing as in arguing. I was worried about some unhinged snowflake busting back window to get the bumper sticker when I was parked at a bar post election. I've had it in my window since April, but post election made it real for some jackasses who might do that. I know other people who didn't put anything on their cars for that reason.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:35 am
by puterbac
Trump has committed to a lot of things, but he is going to be dismayed how few of them he will be able to accomplish. He won't be able to do something as simple as firing a single federal employee. That will be a rude shock for an autocratic businessman.
True, but maybe some civil service laws can be changed. I get not wanting changing admins to just up and fire to replace with their own, but the pendulum is so far the other it's absurd.
His deportation of 11 million illegals? Good luck with that. Ain't going to happen. Dead on arrival.
Does nobody understand a negotiating tactic? You ask for more than you want to end up where you wanted to be. Criminal aliens should be deported or jailed. That 10 yr old girl found in a well would still be alive if the cocksucker had been jailed or deported in 2014 instead of released. That is on Obama. But you do understand the LAW says illegals should be deported right? Illegal immigration increases supply of labor and drives wages down hurting US citizens jobs and wages. When is the last time you saw a construction crew, roofers, or landscaping that wasn't almost entirely hispanic? Understand I don't fault the illegal immigrant. I'd do the same thing in their shoes, but that doesn't make it right or good for US citizens.
His banning of Muslims entering America? Even Scalia (Peace be upon him) would have, and Thomas will, laugh that one out of SCOTUS. It's patently absurd and grotesquely unconstitutional.
Wrong. WAPO article:
If Trump is elected president and follows through with an immigration ban on Muslims (or any other group of people, for that matter), he can do so by asserting powers under the United States Code and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which is the nation’s main immigration act.
Under Title 8, Section 1182 of the U.S. Code, the president has authority to use a proclamation to suspend the entry of “any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States [who] would be detrimental to the interests of the United States,” for however long he deems necessary. This provision was included in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.
Repeal Obamacare? Maybe, but what are you going to replace it with? He has no idea.
It will happen. It will take time as you can't just throw insurance markets into chaos.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 8:14 am
by Professor Tiger
One thing Trump CAN do immediately, and should do, is revoke the absurd regulations Obama enacted during his tenure (and some under W's).
Start with the coal mining regulations that were specifically designed to destroy an entire industry and put thousands of miners out of work. Let California have full access to their own water, which they need badly. From now on, people are more important than two inch fish. Approve the Keystone pipeline on Day One. Let the world know that the days of forcing the American taxpayer to pay tithes to the Global Warming Religion are over.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 9:30 am
by hedge
"From now on, people are more important than two inch fish."
Wrong...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 9:49 am
by Professor Tiger
Johnette's Daddy wrote:Jungle Rat wrote:We have no other choice
Protests in Downtown Los Angeles and in Times Square.
Bless you racist, homophobic mysogynists. WE'RE seceding this time. Enjoy Oklahoma and West Virginia, bigots - and you can keep Detroit for your trouble.
Now that your worst fears have come true, and the Party Formerly Known As The GOP (PFKATGOP©) has full control of the government, how long do you think it will be until they re-institute slavery? Or at least bring back Jim Crow laws and impose then on all 50 states? Within a few months, will they have you drinking from whites only water fountains, sitting in the back of the bus, and paying poll taxes?
It's best to stay in the new Peoples Republic of California, the world's largest safe space. There you'll only have to fight off the Brentwood Chapter of the alt-right. They'll try and drag you behind their Bentleys.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 10:50 am
by Professor Tiger
The morning of Election day, we had this interchange:
Johnette's Daddy wrote:As an aside for the Trump supporters:
Does it bother you that the core Trump supporter is a non-college educated white male baby boomer?
Professor Tiger wrote:I'm not a Trump supporter, but I understand where they're coming from. And your disdain and condescension of non-college educated white male baby boomers, which is typical of Democrats, is precisely why they are supporting Trump. They know exactly what your side thinks of them.
That is a shame. Democrats used to champion such people like factory workers, truck drivers, waitresses, miners, etc: Now the compassionate, tolerant, pluralist, diverse, and inclusive left just sneers at them.
bluetick wrote:Bullshit. Factory and mill workers and miners just want a GED and a job like dear old dad's. Those horse-and-buggy jobs aren't ever coming back and even orange-skin-small-hands knows it. Dems just aren't willing to pander to the easily-duped. Meanwhile high-tech industrial jobs go begging because of unqualified applicants.
And we know which party frowns on pinhead educators and fancy degrees. The same one that denies climate science and rejects green energy in all it's forms.
Turns out, that conversation was a microcosm of the whole election. Those "non-college educated white male baby boomers," whose very existence JD finds so offensive that he just assumed that Republicans should be bothered by them too, and who Tick called "just want a GED and a job like dear old dad's" and "easily duped" and who "frown on pinhead educators and fancy degrees" and "deny climate science and rejects green energy in all it's forms," just gave WI, PA and MI to Trump and made him President. Let that sink in.
Whoever convinced you Democrats to speak of your former base with such hostility and contempt, I would quit listening to them if I were you. And if you continue to follow the 50 year old continuous loop of calling them "racist sexist homophobic blah blah blah," just realize that they don't like that, and they will continue to not vote for you.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 11:44 am
by Toemeesleather
Johnette's Daddy wrote:Toemeesleather wrote:Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has to worry about a steep drop-off of the black vote that could imperil her chances of winning the White House in November, an analysis had found.
LOL.
There will be record black turnout in November, especially if the GOP nominates Trump or Cruz.
Kasich is a curious case, 8 years ago, he was viewed as a hard right winger. Now, he's at the same place but the GOP has moved so far right that he's now considered a moderate. Kasich, however, pulled 30% of the Black vote in his reelection in Ohio. I don't know how that would translate nationally, but if a GOP candidate could pull 18%-20% of the Black vote, the nature of the election changes greatly.
Of more concern to the GOP should be the Latino vote. If that continues as a 70% Democratic base, by 2024 the Democrats will own the ouse, Senate and 40 State legislatures.
....and the results are....
.... although Trump fared little better among blacks and Hispanics than Romney did four years ago, Hillary Clinton did not run as strongly among these core Democratic groups as Obama did in 2012. Clinton held an 80-point advantage among blacks (88% to 8%) compared with Obama’s 87-point edge four years ago (93% to 6%). In 2008, Obama had a 91-point advantage among blacks.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 11:52 am
by Toemeesleather
USN&WR....
Yet on Tuesday, the constituency that surged to the polls for Obama in record numbers -- fiercely punching far above its weight to support and defend the first black president -- didn't answer the call for Clinton, his chosen successor.
While they chose Clinton over Trump by a wide margin, black voter turnout failed to reach the same record-setting level as it did for Obama in 2008 and 2012, analysts say.
Combined with Trump's overperformance among white ex-urban and rural voters, and disillusioned African Americans choosing a third-party candidate or sitting out the election, Clinton's inability to reach Obama-level numbers cost her dearly in swing states with significant black populations, like North Carolina and Pennsylvania.
"Blacks made up 13 percent of the electorate in 2012, about on par with what their population numbers are," says Andra Gillespie, a political scientist at Emory University. "But they only made up 12 percent of the electorate this time," a relatively small but significant drop in numbers.
She also didn't capture as much of the black vote as Obama had. "She had 88 percent of the black vote, but that would put you in the general ballpark of John Kerry," the Democrats' 2004 presidential nominee, Gillespie says.