The Goat Pen

https://www.livescience.com/july-hottes ... hange.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics ... e-america/

https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/ ... ivers-dry/

https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/ ... sil-fuels/

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/ ... 887870001/

and this one especially for prof:

https://time.com/5651393/why-your-brain ... te-change/

Hottest ever recorded=140 years.....less than the blink of an eye in climate history. Enough to convince the statistically brain dead.

Efz

On the bright side, in the blink of an eye in history, you'll both be dead...

Are these supposed statistics brought to us by the same people who have already falsified and manipulated climate data? (East Anglia, IPCC, NOAA)

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/artic ... 99280.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech ... -data.html

https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... l-warming/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/col ... ation.Html

Are these supposed statistics brought to us by the same people that Al Gore quoted when he said the polar ice caps would be melted by now?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/ ... ction.html

Real science starts with an unbiased collection of data, and then form hypotheses to explain the data, and then are at least open to the possibility that their hypotheses might be wrong if the data does not support the hypothesis. Climate science starts with the absolute, dogmatic, faith-based commitment to a conclusion, then collects data, but only accept the data that support the conclusion. They ruthlessly suppress any data that might be contrary to their religious dogma. Climate science is more like Scientology than real science.

Relax, Tick. It's summer. It gets hot this time of year. Wait a few months, and it will be cold. Repeat. That pattern will be exactly the same for your great great great grandchildren. They will laugh at the hysteria and gullibility of late 20th and early 21st century climate change wackos, just like we laugh about "THE SCIENCE!" of Robert Malthus today.

The country needs more Moms like this one.......

[tweet]1163221722675470337[/tweet]

hedge wrote:On the bright side, in the blink of an eye in history, you'll both be dead...

Correct

Scientists bid farewell to the first Icelandic glacier lost to climate change. If more melt, it can be disastrous
By Harmeet Kaur, CNNUpdated 1:26 AM ET, Sun August 18, 2019
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/18/health/g ... index.html

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/envi ... evel-rise/

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html

Rising sea levels is an undisputed fact. Argue about who is to blame - man, God, Lucifer, or "just one of them things that happen I reckon"...the fact remains. There may be only 97% consensus in the scientific community about AGW, but the sea level numbers ring in at one hundred percent.

I'm looking at beachfront property in Ohio.

Even if, for the sake of argument, the sea level were to be rising right now, so what? The sea level has been rising and falling, all by itself, sometimes wildly, for thousands of years.

[youtube]zaiM6b5KSe0[/youtube]

These fluctuations were not caused by the cave men’s camp fires, or Roman hearths.

Hundreds of years before the dawn of history...

[youtube]qAXzzHM8zLw[/youtube]

bluetick wrote:...

Rising sea levels is an undisputed fact. Argue about who is to blame - man, God, Lucifer, or "just one of them things that happen I reckon"...the fact remains. There may be only 97% consensus in the scientific community about AGW, but the sea level numbers ring in at one hundred percent.

Yes, construction cranes are being used to evacuate business in Miami as we type....


[img2]https://www.designboom.com/wp-content/u ... oom-02.jpg[/img2]

And the Coast Guard is buying lots of new ice breakers to cut through all the polar ice that Al Gore said would be gone by now, because 109% of climate experts said, “it is the science!”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnew ... ncna942236

You win, fucktards. It will indeed get cold this winter.

Embrace your idiocy.

This is the current Democratic party line now

tank the economy to gain power.

threaten the Supreme Court to find in their favor or get replace/marginalized

coming into this country illegally is a racist viewpoint


its stunning really

I've only been saying this for 20 years


The leaders of some of America’s biggest companies are chipping away at the long-held notion that corporate decision-making should revolve around what is best for shareholders.

The Business Roundtable on Monday changed its statement of “the purpose of a corporation.” No longer should decisions be based solely on whether they will yield higher profits for shareholders, the group said. Rather, corporate leaders should take into account “all stakeholders”—that is, employees, customers and society writ large.

It is a major philosophical shift for the association, which counts the chief executives of dozens of the biggest U.S. companies as its members. The group, led by JPMorgan Chase & Co. CEO James Dimon, is a powerful voice in Washington for U.S. business interests. It represents a broad swath of American industry, counting among its members the leaders of technology giants and manufacturing companies, airlines and institutional investors, to name a few.

The Business Roundtable’s old statement of purpose espoused economist Milton Friedman’s decades-old theory that companies’ only obligation is to maximize value for shareholders.

“Each of our stakeholders is essential,” the new statement says. “We commit to deliver value to all of them, for the future success of our companies, our communities and our country.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/business-r ... 1566205200

I'm sure that will placate Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders...

"“Each of our stakeholders is essential,” the new statement says."

It's amazing how quickly something called "stakeholders" can go from not even considered to essential overnight...

"I've only been saying this for 20 years"

Indeed you have. Of course, it's a technically liberal notion (as opposed to their former technically (indeed, definitional) conservative position) that workers and society at large should be major considerations for corporations, but you've has been a closet liberal for as long as I've known you, or at the very least have harbored liberal sentiments (some, anyway). You just can't bring yourself to admit it by name. That's alright, as Nietzsche said, everything profound loves a mask...

eCat wrote:This is the current Democratic party line now

tank the economy to gain power.

threaten the Supreme Court to find in their favor or get replace/marginalized

coming into this country illegally is a racist viewpoint


its stunning really

What's more stunning is that you actually believe this

Epstein was smart to sign that will before Bill and/or Donnie got to him. Downright clairvoyant imo.