Page 1116 of 1476
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 8:08 pm
by Professor Tiger
A lifetime of excessive lasagna stopped Nino, peace be upon him.
The left did stop Bork. Their high tech lynching of Thomas almost stopped him.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 8:31 pm
by AlabamAlum
Lasagna? He was a few weeks from 80-years-old. If that's due to lifetime lasagna, then it could officially be designated a health food.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:44 am
by hedge
Should there be a mandatory retirement age for federal judges? If so, what age? Scalia seemed to be in pretty good shape, his sudden death notwithstanding (heh), but when you say "80 years old", it sounds kinda old. Should these ancient crones be the ultimate legal authorities of the land? Discuss...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:53 am
by hedge
Damn, I was thinking Alito was in his 50's, that motherfucker is 65. I didn't think he was that old. Not that 65 is particularly old, I just didn't think he was that old. On the flip side, Ginsburg is only 82, I thought she was 102...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:59 am
by hedge
I see that a John McLean was one of the longest serving Supreme court justices. I think I might be related to him, only b/c the change in his appearance from a young man to an older man appears to mirror my own to a startling degree:
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:05 am
by sardis
Haaaaaaannnnnns!
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:31 am
by hedge
Good lord (heh), we've got 5 catholics and 3 jews on the supreme court now, and I'm sure Scalia was catholic too. Goddamn, presidents, would it kill you to nominate a methodist??
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:45 am
by hedge
From wikipedia's jews on the supreme court:
"Brandeis was succeeded by Protestant William O. Douglas, but Cardozo was succeeded by another Jewish Justice, Felix Frankfurter. Negative reaction to the appointment of the early Jewish justices did not exclusively come from outside the Court. Justice James Clark McReynolds, a blatant anti-semite, refused to speak to Brandeis for three years following the latter's appointment and when Brandeis retired in 1939, did not sign the customary dedicatory letter sent to Court members on their retirement. During Benjamin Cardozo's swearing in ceremony McReynolds pointedly read a newspaper muttering "another one" and did not attend that of Felix Frankfurter, exclaiming "My God, another Jew on the Court!"
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 12:54 pm
by Professor Tiger
Hedge advocating for Methodist Christians in the highest levels of government?
Weird...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 1:40 pm
by hedge
Most methodists I know are really agnostic. They just figure they can hedge their bet by showing up for church every so often, which is the general trajectory of religion in general (non-crazy ass muslims and the occasional chatroom eastern orthodox catholic rable-rouser (or whatever prof is) notwithstanding)...
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 2:35 pm
by bluetick
Hedge said hedge.
right said fred
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 4:03 pm
by bluetick
Welp. Trump harpoons Christie and the unthinkable appears to be very thinkable.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:28 pm
by Jungle Rat
Crazy attracts crazy.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:47 pm
by Johnette's Daddy
bluetick wrote:Welp. Trump harpoons Christie and the unthinkable appears to be very thinkable.
[youtube]AyenRCJ_4Ww[/youtube]
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:49 pm
by Johnette's Daddy
Trump v. The President of Mexico
[youtube]x4OwJOVi0ec[/youtube]
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:34 pm
by Professor Tiger
Johnette's Daddy wrote:bluetick wrote:Welp. Trump harpoons Christie and the unthinkable appears to be very thinkable.
[youtube]AyenRCJ_4Ww[/youtube]
That's funny right there.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
by Professor Tiger
This is how Hillary gets her votes. Start at :38
[youtube]532j-186xEQ[/youtube]
As an added bonus, here is the Democrat party:
[youtube]g6PDcBhODqo[/youtube]
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 12:17 am
by Johnette's Daddy
Professor Tiger wrote:This is how Hillary gets her votes. Start at :38
Where's the thread to discuss how JJ Abrams ruined both Star Trek AND Star Wars? That SOB needs to be gang raped by Wookies.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 8:11 am
by Professor Tiger
I'm still trying to figure out how a country with 300 million people can only come up with Hillary and The Donald as our next president. A greedy lying criminal or P.T. Barnum will soon be the leader of the free world and control nuclear weapons.
We'll get the leader we deserve. We are so screwed.
Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:22 am
by Toemeesleather
Style over substance officially began circa 1993....completely took over in '09.