The Goat Pen

Posted: **Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:23 am**

Lol. They will likely give a nobel peace prize to Kim Jong Un

Posted: **Fri Apr 27, 2018 8:28 am**

Cletus wrote:I don’t recall defending Obama’s prize.

I don't recall asking

I don't think Trump deserves a peace prize. The hypocrisy of Obama versus now was my whole point.

Posted: **Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:03 am**

The awarding of the Nobel peace prize to Obama was definitely a head-scratcher...

Posted: **Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:42 am**

It'd be hard to give a Nobel Peace Prize to somebody who watches their political enemies get torn to literal pieces by wild dogs. And executes others with anti-aircraft guns.

But..oprama got one, so you never know.

Posted: **Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:13 pm**

hedge wrote:The awarding of the Nobel peace prize to Obama was definitely a head-scratcher...

To me it’s not complicated. Obama was the first person to receive the Nobel for being both a US President and black. I’m sure they had another Nobel statue ready to go for Hillary; just substitute “woman” for “black.”

Posted: **Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:50 pm**

Professor Tiger wrote:
hedge wrote:The awarding of the Nobel peace prize to Obama was definitely a head-scratcher...
To me it’s not complicated. Obama was the first person to receive the Nobel for being both a US President and black. I’m sure they had another Nobel statue ready to go for Hillary; just substitute “woman” for “black.”

I think he got it because he made a calculated move in running for the presidency to come out against the war (3 years too late but whatever) and setting Hillary up to look like a hawk.

Then stumped on the idea that we'd be a peaceful world leader.

he got the nobel peace prize because he presented himself as the anti-George Bush

then he made Hawkish Hillary his Secretary of State

Posted: **Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:17 pm**

Crap. I forgot about Kim assassinating his brother by having those two skanks rub poison on his face at the Avis counter.

Donnie better take some Purell when they sit down in Singapore or wherever.

Posted: **Fri Apr 27, 2018 3:13 pm**

That is probably the last hope you liberal dicklickers have of getting rid of Trump.

Posted: **Sat Apr 28, 2018 11:49 am**

They'll never give up hope of getting rid of Trump.That would be like Ian Paisley becoming Catholic. NEVAH! E.G. from a week ago....

Re: Florida State Seminoles

Postby Jungle Rat » Fri Apr 20, 2018 5:24 pm
Trump ain't making it to year 4. Fuck that orange bastard

TDS has sadly eradicated all their rationality when it comes to The Donald. It's all just rage and bitterness now.

Posted: **Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:16 pm**

Rage and bitterness are powerful motivators around election time. As a Trump supporter, you are intimately aware of this, it's what got Trump elected. They caught the Left sleeping, fat and happy after 8 years with the chosen one in office. We'll see if white rust belt bitterness and rage will be enough to overcome what's brewing on the left now, come November. I really don't think it would've been enough in 2016 had the dems ran anybody besides Hilary. If there's a dem tsunami at the midterms, I seriously doubt Trump will run again in 2020. He doesn't want to be humiliated...

Posted: **Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:19 pm**

If anything, white rust belt bitterness and rage might turn on Trump, as for all intents and purposes not a damn thing has changed for any of those people since he got elected, and it's not going to. Maybe they'll just realize they're being fucked by market forces beyond the control of politicians (thank god), but that's doubtful, since almost all miserable people desperately need somebody to blame for their bad condition...

Posted: **Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:29 pm**

I really don't think it would've been enough in 2016 had the dems ran anybody besides Hilary.

I agree with this^ part. The Dem's nominated a manifestly greedy, incompetent corrupt liar without the slightest hint of likeability. ANYBODY else would have beaten Trump handily. It'll be interesting to see which septuagenarian McGovernite they nominate next. Who do you think? Hillary, Bernie or Biden?

Posted: **Sat Apr 28, 2018 3:29 pm**

So bitter

Posted: **Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:00 pm**

: 31301974_2099905326894038_2599972501471625216_n.jpg (78.02 KiB) Viewed 454 times

Posted: **Sat Apr 28, 2018 10:26 pm**

"It'll be interesting to see which septuagenarian McGovernite they nominate next. "

Trump is no spring chicken himself, even though struts around like a bantam (pronounced bainty) rooster...

Posted: **Sun Apr 29, 2018 8:01 pm**

Trump's the same age as Hillary - 70. If he can run in 2020. why can't Hillary? Maybe three times is a charm for the PAH.

Joe Biden checks in at 75 years. He'll be a creaky 78 on election day in 2020.

But Joe's is edged out by Bernie Sanders, still feisty at 76. He'll be a whopping 79 on election day. But he won't hold Hillary's or Joe's youth and inexperience against them in the campaign.

After these senior citizens, the Dems' don't have much of a bench.

Posted: **Mon Apr 30, 2018 8:16 am**

You use dated terms like coloreds and negroes quite a lot, toe. Your reasons are all your own, of course.

Yes, obvious. And you use the modern establishment pc(never saying what you mean, never meaning what you say). Same result, yours acceptable racism, mine unacceptable racism.

Posted: **Mon Apr 30, 2018 10:41 am**

You use dated terms like coloreds and negroes quite a lot, toe. Your reasons are all your own, of course.

Just for a little historical perspective:

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Postby bluetick » Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:06 am
...And you are lynching Negroes, as a "classic" example of the tactic.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Postby bluetick » Sun Dec 18, 2016 9:08 pm
There was also a time when white baker's didn't have to sell to negroes. I suppose that was against some people's religion, too. But the law said "get over it", and they did.

Posted: **Mon Apr 30, 2018 1:54 pm**

Professor Tiger wrote:
Just for a little historical perspective:

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Postby bluetick » Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:06 am
...And you are lynching Negroes, as a "classic" example of the tactic.

There is no Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:06 am post at PNN, from me or anybody else. Fake news chicanery aside...not sure why you stepped in between me and toe anyway.

Posted: **Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:42 pm**

bluetick wrote:
Professor Tiger wrote:
Just for a little historical perspective:

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Postby bluetick » Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:06 am
...And you are lynching Negroes, as a "classic" example of the tactic.
There is no Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:06 am post at PNN, from me or anybody else. Fake news chicanery aside...not sure why you stepped in between me and toe anyway.

Actually, there is - http://goatpen.net/forums/viewtopic.php ... 20#p157631 - but, hilariously, it's you quoting someone else. Prof once again demonstrating his excellent reading skills.