Page 1094 of 1649

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:45 pm
by aTm
Why does he care?

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:58 pm
by hedge
Civic duty...

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:45 pm
by eCat
I dunno

Dude gives a bunch of money to both programs.

I guess he isn't happy about being associated with the program raping the taxpayer

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:58 pm
by 10ac

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 5:42 pm
by DooKSucks
National Mother Fucking Champions

You can all bow down, bitches

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:35 pm
by Jungle Rat
You can bow down and blow me

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:38 pm
by Professor Tiger
Dang, Rat. You're on a roll today.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 1:42 pm
by Jungle Rat
Downhill

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:55 am
by crashcourse
epic collapse by the pacers last night up 26 and lose
love and irving spent the whole 4th on the bench while james hit everything

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:32 am
by hedge
In that case, I wish you had been playing...

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 8:00 pm
by crotch
SEC Commissioner Sankey heads investigation into Unc's cheating scandal........

http://kentuckysportsradio.com/basketba ... -carolina/

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:20 pm
by Professor Tiger
All UNC needs to do is make sure the president of the NCAA is a personal friend of your head coach. Then, UNC needs to make sure that the NCAA Director of Enforcement is a graduate and fan of your school.

That arrangement worked for Nick Saban and Alabama for years, and successfully kept all their rules violations under wraps. A similar arrangement would work for UNC now.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:58 am
by 10ac
A blow job wqouldn't hurt eiher.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:06 am
by hedge
UNC called for Sankey's recusal because, among other reasons, he is a potential witness:

"A second reason for the recusal request likely carries far greater importance. The NCAA determined that Auburn University did not commit academic fraud in 2005-06 by allowing student-athletes to take independent study classes taught by Sociology department chair Thomas Petee and adult education professor James Witte that required minimal, if any, time in the classroom. Petee taught 252 independent study courses in one academic year (2004-05).

Sankey was an associate SEC commissioner during that investigation, and therefore his participation in that review makes him a potential witness in UNC’s investigation due to the similarities in the cases, according to Abrams.

“This argument renders Mr. Sankey a potential witness in this matter because he personally possesses material factual information that is not part of the the record,” Abrams wrote."

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 11:11 am
by eCat
hedge wrote:UNC called for Sankey's recusal because, among other reasons, he is a potential witness:

"A second reason for the recusal request likely carries far greater importance. The NCAA determined that Auburn University did not commit academic fraud in 2005-06 by allowing student-athletes to take independent study classes taught by Sociology department chair Thomas Petee and adult education professor James Witte that required minimal, if any, time in the classroom. Petee taught 252 independent study courses in one academic year (2004-05).

Sankey was an associate SEC commissioner during that investigation, and therefore his participation in that review makes him a potential witness in UNC’s investigation due to the similarities in the cases, according to Abrams.

“This argument renders Mr. Sankey a potential witness in this matter because he personally possesses material factual information that is not part of the the record,” Abrams wrote."
that isn't the reason they want him off

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:35 pm
by hedge
It's one of several, but most importantly, it's one that will matter to a real judge if this case goes to court, even if it doesn't matter to the folks running the kangaroo court of the NCAA...

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:43 pm
by Professor Tiger
Heh. hedge sounds just like AA did back in the old days when the NCAA still made an attempt to hold Bama accountable for their violations.

If I'm right, and UNC has joined the "too big to fail" club, then the Tar Heel faithful don't have a thing to worry about.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:46 pm
by hedge
Post by eCat and my reply, from March 30 of last year...
hedge wrote:"my point is the ride is over for Roy. He will not be going back to another one as coach of UNC"

We shall see. The cupboard isn't exactly going to be bare in Chapel Hill next year. Hard for me to see anybody on this team except Brice Johnson going high in the draft. If we have Berry (who has played better this year than Paige and I believe was more highly rated coming out of high school), Jackson, Meeks and Hicks back next year, combined with Pinson and Britt, there's no reason we shouldn't make another run next year. We'll have another seasoned, veteran team coming off at minimum a FF run. Of course, the NCAA may have something to say about any postseason hopes we have, but next year's team should be pretty strong...

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:50 pm
by hedge
And if Berry and Bradley come back for next season, we should be set to make another FF run. We will need both of those guys for that to happen, and Bradley, especially, I think could work himself into a very high lottery pick. He could have a season that will look like a combination of Tim Duncan and Anthony Davis...

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 12:52 pm
by Professor Tiger
Enjoy breathing the rarified air of your elite status.

The only thing that could make it better would be to put Duke and NC St. on NCAA probation as punishment for their insolence.