Page 992 of 1653

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:59 pm
by Jungle Rat
Dumb da dumb dumb dummmmmb

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:59 pm
by eCat
I'll give you credit for hanging out here and taking it Goldie

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:00 am
by Owlman
Saw Terry Crews at the game

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:00 am
by goldenbear
Owlman wrote:Then why punish the women's soccer team?

for other stuff I think I did not read the whole report, just stuff on men hoop

what did the allegation report say

the notice had one mention of Boys hoop

maybe this time there will be more but I doubt ROy seems pretty confident

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:01 am
by goldenbear
I wont be able to sleep anyways so I miss well bitch about refs and Roy

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:02 am
by Jungle Rat
Need a gun?

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:03 am
by eCat
goldenbear wrote:
Owlman wrote:Then why punish the women's soccer team?

for other stuff I think I did not read the whole report, just stuff on men hoop

what did the allegation report say

the notice had one mention of Boys hoop

maybe this time there will be more but I doubt ROy seems pretty confident


Roy isn't saying that because he's confident. He's saying it because his recruiting would be even worse if he didn't

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:03 am
by goldenbear
Jungle Rat wrote:Need a gun?
yes as long as it does not have bullets

guns might not kill but Bullets do

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:07 am
by Owlman
scholarship reduction and 1 year post-season ban on football, men's soccer, basketball and woman's basketball. Nothing for Roy.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:07 am
by goldenbear
eCat wrote:
goldenbear wrote:
Owlman wrote:Then why punish the women's soccer team?

for other stuff I think I did not read the whole report, just stuff on men hoop

what did the allegation report say

the notice had one mention of Boys hoop

maybe this time there will be more but I doubt ROy seems pretty confident


Roy isn't saying that because he's confident. He's saying it because his recruiting would be even worse if he didn't
I dont think so

how hard can they get it,

first time offender even if they are guilty

Cuse did not get hit that hard and was repeat offender with numerous issues

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:09 am
by eCat
Fan will realize Roy brought his own academic guy from Kansas with him for the purpose of running buffer for him on keeping players eligible. Roy will quit after that.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:09 am
by goldenbear
Owlman wrote:scholarship reduction and 1 year post-season ban on football, men's soccer, basketball and woman's basketball. Nothing for Roy.

I dont think Mens hoop will get post season ban

maybe a scholarship but will need to see new report

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:10 am
by Saint
eCat wrote:oh

that's got to hurt

now get on the bus and go home Carolina
Nah, I'm too old to worry about losing a game. Would have liked to win but you can't really complain about a 35-footer at the buzzer to beat you.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:11 am
by goldenbear
you can with you best guy to guard Jenkins on the bnech

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:11 am
by eCat
goldenbear wrote:
I dont think so

how hard can they get it,

first time offender even if they are guilty

Cuse did not get hit that hard and was repeat offender with numerous issues

First time offender for 18 years of scandal, with the biggest beneficiary being the 2005 national champion team.

They should take away the national championship. They won't because the NCAA is scared of the fallout, but they should

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:12 am
by SnoodGator
Well sorry for the Carolina fans. But I had a great night. On the road and I am at the bar with a work colleague watching the game. Early on he told me he's in a square pool and had 7-4. All game we are calculating how he can win and then Bam! He won $2500. Lots of fun.

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:17 am
by hedge
Well that sucked. I think we would've taken it in OT but that shot by Paige was a miracle, so according to the odds tracker we shouldn't have even been in position to take it to OT. Well, whatever. Fuck the odds tracker...

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:20 am
by goldenbear
eCat wrote:
goldenbear wrote:
I dont think so

how hard can they get it,

first time offender even if they are guilty

Cuse did not get hit that hard and was repeat offender with numerous issues

First time offender for 18 years of scandal, with the biggest beneficiary being the 2005 national champion team.

They should take away the national championship. They won't because the NCAA is scared of the fallout, but they should

wrong about 05 McCants classes he passed were in Spring of 05 that lead to his 06 eligibility, 05 eligibility was not effected, similar situation to SImmions this year

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:22 am
by eCat
goldenbear wrote:
eCat wrote:
goldenbear wrote:
I dont think so

how hard can they get it,

first time offender even if they are guilty

Cuse did not get hit that hard and was repeat offender with numerous issues

First time offender for 18 years of scandal, with the biggest beneficiary being the 2005 national champion team.

They should take away the national championship. They won't because the NCAA is scared of the fallout, but they should

wrong about 05 McCants classes he passed were in Spring of 05 that lead to his 06 eligibility, 05 eligibility was not effected, similar situation to SImmions this year
so now you admit McCants was ineligible at some point?

Re: Ostensibly Hoops

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:23 am
by goldenbear
hedge wrote:Well that sucked. I think we would've taken it in OT but that shot by Paige was a miracle, so according to the odds tracker we shouldn't have even been in position to take it to OT. Well, whatever. Fuck the odds tracker...

UNC was better team, the way it was officiated benefited Nova guards and then there was some calls that totally changed the out come of the game that went there way.

I dont mind them calling it tight but if they call it tight you have to call the off arm space clearing that Nova did every time down, they could have been called for 10 fo thsoe