Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:28 am
Yep, F Syria...
College Hoops, Disrespection, and More
https://goatpen.net/forums/
EFZ. And Libya. And Egypt. They're civil wars. Let one faction win, then we'll only have one bunch to take over.Toemeesleather wrote:Yep, F Syria...
Heh...yeah, because anyone who doesn't support Obama is a racist, right?TheBigMook wrote:meh, pointless. If the numbers are good in a year and 3 mos. from now, who cares? It matters not what they were in June of 2011. Obama just has to show an upward trend from the economies nadir and keep hammering home that point. All is lost to you, flee, flee.
You great patriots just need to keep a prayin' that the economy gets worse. Great Americans all! Anything to get that negro out!
that is what Bill Maher does. He has gone on the record to say that he doesn't think all Republicans are racist, but he DOES believe that all racists are Republicans. If President Obama does not win re-election, it will only prove (to Bill Maher) that our nation that originally elected him is now somehow to racist to elect a half-black President.Hacksaw wrote:It's all they've got, toe. Their president is an abject failure. They'll have to slander anyone who questions him, because they certainly can't defend his record.
sure you can make this shit up. this is what happens when you have dumbfuck speech writers working for you and if you refuse to use your brain before you speak.Toemeesleather wrote:“There are some structural issues with our economy where a lot of businesses have learned to become much more efficient with a lot fewer workers. You see it when you go to a bank and you use an ATM, you don’t go to a bank teller, or you go to the airport and you’re using a kiosk instead of checking in at the gate.”
Sooooooo, according to our fearless blame it on somebody/something prez.....automation is now the problem.....you can't make his sh!t up!!
4 More Years!!!!!
Incest? Well, they never would have known about it (until their first child was born with 3 arms, 1 eye, and an IQ of 43) if the British government didn't sanction their marriage with a blood test.Sexy Ann wrote:If state governments stop officially registering marriages, then who gets to adopt? How are child support and child custody issues determined if the government doesn't recognize marriage? How about a private company's health care plans -- whom will those cover? Who has legal authority to issue "do not resuscitate" orders to doctors? (Of course, under Obamacare we won't be resuscitating anyone.)
Who inherits in the absence of a will? Who is entitled to a person's Social Security and Medicare benefits? How do you know if you're divorced and able to remarry? Where would liberals get their phony statistics about most marriages ending in divorce? ....
....Under Paul's plan, siblings could marry one another, perhaps intentionally, but also perhaps unaware that they were fraternal twins separated and sent to different adoptive families at birth -- as actually happened in Britain a few years ago after taking the government-mandated blood test for marriage.
There is so much truth to this. That is the whole point about the absurdity of Libertarianism, to be a true Libertarian means you are a Conservative that must check your brain at the door before entering the room of common sense. Because common sense can play no real part of Libertarianism. You are ALL about liberty, fuck anyone who draws a line in the sand and says to you, "...NO, stop."Sexy Ann wrote:There are reasons we have laws governing important institutions, such as marriage. As in landscaping, you don't remove a wall until you know why it was put there.
Marriage is a legal construct with legal consequences, particularly regarding rights and duties to children. Libertarians would be better off spearheading a movement to get rid of stop signs than to get rid of officially sanctioned marriage. A world without government stop signs would be safer than a world without government marriage.....
Most libertarians are cowering frauds too afraid to upset anyone to take a stand on some of the most important cultural issues of our time. So they dodge the tough questions when it suits their purposes by pretending to be Randian purists, but are perfectly comfortable issuing politically expedient answers when it comes to the taxpayers' obligations under Medicare and Social Security.
10ac wrote:No matter who's doing the killin', dead arabs is always a good thing.