The Goat Pen

No doubt but they are fooling some folks. You know, the morans.

My favorite pic from the women's march was the lady holding up a sign reading: "Look at all the correctly spelled signs!"

Or the kid holding up the sign reading: "What do we want? Evidence based science! When do we want it? After peer review!"

Those are good.

I saw the peer review sign. It was very good.

Now a Spurs fan...

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/1852 ... nald-trump

Pop will say anything. He doesn't care. I like him, too.

AlabamAlum wrote:

Bklyn wrote:Religious conservative idiots

Exactly.

yea, they just came out of nowhere didn't they?

No, people just found Hilary to be unpalatable and figured they'd go with the alternative. While I didn't go that route despite my distate for her, I get the reason Trump was elected. What I don't get are the folks who found him to be the best option in the field from the beginning.

I think Trump's policies on the economic side will be beneficial, certainly for a while. Whether his emotional tendencies override those gains remains to be seen. Ultimately, his war with the press probably won't bear the results he's hoping for.

AlabamAlum wrote:Stats, evidence, and proof can be troublesome.
.

if we're going to cast shade on me ignoring stats, humor me and show me the stats/studies

There are a few here, eCat. https://journalistsresource.org/studies ... n-research

http://abcnews.go.com/US/sexual-assault ... d=38604019



https://mic.com/articles/114066/statist ... .9dvbejqfT

There are more. If you want, give me a few days and I will get you more with a PubMed or Cinahl search.

AlabamAlum wrote:There are a few here, eCat. https://journalistsresource.org/studies ... n-research

http://abcnews.go.com/US/sexual-assault ... d=38604019



https://mic.com/articles/114066/statist ... .9dvbejqfT

There are more. If you want, give me a few days and I will get you more with a PubMed or Cinahl search.

I'll never be comfortable with it. I'll vote accordingly if there is an option to.

That's your right as an American.

eCat is taking his final stand.

Up on the Blue Ridge mountain, there I'll take my stand
Up on the Blue Ridge mountain, there I'll take my stand
A rifle on my shoulder, six-shooter in my hand
Lord, Lord, I've been all around this world

Saint wrote:eCat is taking his final stand.

that's why they call me

bom Bom BOM


BAAAAAAAAADDDDD CUMPANY....and I can't deny...aye

"in the first example, the bathroom, its a public safety measure "

I just can't take that view seriously at all...

eCat wrote:

Saint wrote:eCat is taking his final stand.

that's why they call me

bom Bom BOM


BAAAAAAAAADDDDD CUMPANY....and I can't deny...aye

So how many years before you buy that '83 Trans-Am you've always wanted?

OK, now I see you admitting that you're just not comfortable with it, which is fine. But the idea that the government shouldn't criminalize shit simply b/c it makes some folks uncomfortable is pretty major tenet of liberalism. Come to think of it, it's almost a cornerstone principle of what I consider to be true conservatism. How bout that?

Also, props on rendering the "bom Bom BOM" perfectly...

"o how many years before you buy that '83 Trans-Am you've always wanted?"

With the gold phoenix on the hood...

I saw this a few days ago. I've never heard of a Skybird before

http://cincinnati.craigslist.org/cto/5937256903.html

It's like the Wake Forest of the muscle car genre.

Saint wrote:It's like the Wake Forest of the muscle car genre.

I would have like to have been a fly on the wall in GM during the late 70's.

Every conversation must have included "well they're idiots, they won't know the difference" when discussing introducing these cars to the public.

About 10 years ago I did want a trans am but then so did every other guy my age so they shot up in value.

To get a restored one that is nice, you're gonna plunk down $18K - for a 180HP V8 with leaf spring suspension, very little crash protection and gets like 16 mpg.

I'll just get a used Lexus.