Page 830 of 1476

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 1:49 pm
by AlabamAlum
He wasn't serious, crash. No way.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 2:32 pm
by bluetick
JD may want a mulligan on the last sentence. The rest of it - the GOP war on women - was spot on.

I never thought IB was serious about taking away all women's right to vote. Until he mentioned it around the 50th time..

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 2:33 pm
by crashcourse
[*]yeah thats treading IB territory there

IB=JD?!?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 2:45 pm
by AlabamAlum
What exactly is the Repub War on Women? What are the republicans proposing to initiate this war? As it is, I see no real difference in the two parties outside of campaign rhetoric - and I haven't noticed much anti-woman stuff from either camps' empty campaign promises.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 4:42 pm
by sardis
Johnette's Daddy wrote:
sardis wrote:It's funny that when a young man feels if a woman refuses to have sex with him that she should die, liberals will first scream, "we have a gun culture problem!"

No, I don't think guns are the problem here.
No, first we scream "the Republicans need to stop their War on Women." When women are portrayed alternately as simple-minded creatures incapable of self-determination or as shameless whores whose uteruses need legislating, it is inevitable that some socially awkward dweeb will snap and shoot when he encounters a woman who doesn't succumb to his whims.
Take away the "uteruses need legislating" and you just described the hip hop culture.

And somehow I doubt this kid was even one iota close to any "Republican" culture.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 6:06 pm
by Johnette's Daddy
sardis wrote:
Johnette's Daddy wrote:
sardis wrote:It's funny that when a young man feels if a woman refuses to have sex with him that she should die, liberals will first scream, "we have a gun culture problem!"

No, I don't think guns are the problem here.
No, first we scream "the Republicans need to stop their War on Women." When women are portrayed alternately as simple-minded creatures incapable of self-determination or as shameless whores whose uteruses need legislating, it is inevitable that some socially awkward dweeb will snap and shoot when he encounters a woman who doesn't succumb to his whims.
Take away the "uteruses need legislating" and you just described the hip hop culture.
Clearly, you know nothing about hip hop culture. They portray women as scheming, conniving gold diggers and/or emasculating harridans, not as simple-minded creatures incapable of self-determination.
And somehow I doubt this kid was even one iota close to any "Republican" culture.
1 - Raised in the lap of luxury
2 - Attended college in a county where 2.2% of the population is Black
3 - owned a bunch of guns
4 - resented white women who dated black men
5 - confronted by law enforcement, who didn't bother to search him or his apartment when they saw he was white and drove a beemer.

That's Republican enough for me.

And, in the spirit of Rush Rove and Karl Limbaugh, I will now double down on my "it's all the GOP's fault" comment. The GOP has created such a climate of "everyone is against white men with our tiny peckers and lack of rhythm - we need to stand up and do something before all of our daughters marry mud people and our grandkids grow up speaking Mexican and living on food stamps" rhetoric that it is normative thinking for talk radio.

Plus, it is a known fact that socially awkward dweebs vote Republican 75% of the time.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 6:22 pm
by AlabamAlum
Wow. JD might be the Left's version of IB.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 7:30 pm
by Professor Tiger
And somehow I doubt this kid was even one iota close to any "Republican" culture.
Old? No.
Bald? No.
Fat? No.
Rich? No.
Brylcream or combover hairdo? No.
Avid golfer? No.

Definitely not Republican.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 8:14 pm
by AlabamAlum
Even if Jeffrey Dahmer had worked for Clinton '92, there is no way any sane person could make a connection between cannibalism and the democrats.

There is a line that you can cross that is more than just being a biased and partisan shill - a status that renders you as someone not be listened to or taken seriously -IB hit that long ago. It's a shame that someone I enjoyed reading appears to be joining the list. Maybe it's a parody. If so, it's too far.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 8:15 pm
by aTm
What? I always assumed that the Mexicans had small dicks too!

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 8:20 pm
by Professor Tiger
What exactly is the Repub War on Women?
Answer: The R's aren't eager to use taxpayer money to pay for Sandra Fluke's birth control. It's almost as bad as slavery and genocide.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 8:23 pm
by Professor Tiger
There is a line that you can cross that is more than just being a biased and partisan shill - a status that renders you as someone not be listened to or taken seriously -IB hit that long ago. It's a shame that someone I enjoyed reading appears to be joining the list. Maybe it's a parody. If so, it's too far.
Can I get a "JDYAAM"?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 10:10 pm
by sardis
I sure hope its a parody because it would be good.

The kid was actually poor whose mother only made 40k and his dad couldn't afford child support because he sunk all his money in an anti- religious documentary.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed May 28, 2014 11:39 pm
by Jungle Rat
AlabamAlum wrote:Wow. JD might be the Left's version of IB.
I make it a point to avoid reading his posts on this forum.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 12:49 am
by Johnette's Daddy
AlabamAlum wrote:Even if Jeffrey Dahmer had worked for Clinton '92, there is no way any sane person could make a connection between cannibalism and the democrats.

There is a line that you can cross that is more than just being a biased and partisan shill - a status that renders you as someone not be listened to or taken seriously -IB hit that long ago. It's a shame that someone I enjoyed reading appears to be joining the list. Maybe it's a parody. If so, it's too far.
Un-bunch your panties. I guess you missed the Rush Rove/Karl Limbaugh reference.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 12:50 am
by 10ac
Jungle Rat wrote:
AlabamAlum wrote:Wow. JD might be the Left's version of IB.
I make it a point to avoid reading his posts on this forum.
As I, from now on.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 9:42 am
by Toemeesleather
JD is the personification of the MSM on the goat pen.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 11:36 am
by Johnette's Daddy
Toemeesleather wrote:JD is the personification of the MSM on the goat pen.
Thank you. I'm flattered.

Given the high concentration of Tea Partiers, Mysogynists, Birthers and Gun Nuts on PNN, that makes me a solid moderate in real life.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 12:23 pm
by Toemeesleather
Tell us all about the real planes that flew into the WTC.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 12:34 pm
by Toemeesleather
As usual, the numbers get revised, with less fanfare. But this is no surprise given the policies of this admin....MORE QE!!111


The Commerce Department said Thursday that the economy shrank at an annual rate of 1 percent in the first quarter, revising down its initial estimate last month, which showed a very slight gain for the period. It is the first quarter in three years in which the nation’s output of goods and services has contracted.


Cue Tick touting the great reduction in the latest unemployment figures.