Page 792 of 1657
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:49 am
by Saint
I have a bigger problem with her face. What the hell is Phelps thinking?
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:35 am
by eCat
I would think he would have stopped when (s)he said "let me move my penis out of the way"
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 8:40 am
by AlabamAlum
No, she got the penis chopped off.
And, stu, he was drunk.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 9:36 am
by eCat
interesting scar
oh that? that's where my dick used to be
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 9:47 am
by AlabamAlum
You'd be amazed at what a good surgeon can do. For the non hermaphrodites, they turn a penis into a vagina. This
person already had the female happy bits. This procedure was so easy that guy got to the golf course early.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 10:46 am
by eCat
just let me have the dick jokes
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 12:55 pm
by hedge
I saw some show where they turned a female into a male, they said they used her clit to make the penis. Damn, talk about the little engine that could...
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:15 pm
by innocentbystander
5PM EST today... Lets be honest. Out of 351 teams in the nation
West Virginia is 69th in points per game vs BC at 258th
West Virginia is 20th in rebounds per game vs BC at 186th
West Virginia is 86th in assists per game vs BC at 255th
West Virginia is 295th in field goal percentage vs BC at 254th
On paper BC has very little chance at winning this game. The only hope I can see here is WVa field goal percentage shooting in the low twenties instead of the high 30s. That is probably the one way BC wins.
Now maybe these dramatically better numbers that WVa has (vs BC) is with respect to their opponents? Afterall, New Mexico's numbers in all 4 categories were way better than BC's numbers. It's pretty easy to pump up your numbers (nationally) if all you've played is the little sisters of the poor.
UNH + UMass + New Mexico >>>>>>>>>>>>>much better than>>>>>>> Monmouth + Lafayette + George Mason
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:17 pm
by hedge
Those rankings are after, what?, 2 games? Insignificant...
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:36 pm
by innocentbystander
hedge wrote:Those rankings are after, what?, 2 games? Insignificant...
3 games, but maybe you are right. BC and WVa are playing this game. So if WVa blws BC away (as well they should) then we'll know the rankings might have value. If BC wins by a point, then sure, these rankings wont mean much.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:37 pm
by hedge
Scintillating insight...
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:50 pm
by innocentbystander
hedge wrote:Scintillating insight...
You guys just.... take care of your own business.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:24 pm
by aTm
Well, after blowing a game yesterday we looked like shit again today but at least we won. Also the NCAA cleared Danuel House to play right away, in what I can only guess is a "Fuck you Kelvin Sampson, your transfer can play immediately! Ha ha!" type move. Now just need to get Tonny Trocha's eligibility instated, which was supposedly done last year, but I guess Kentucky has decided that A&M might be a threat at some point and brought up some things about his high school in Colombia (even though Cal was recruiting him too I'm sure things looked hunky dory as long as he was at Kentucky).
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:53 pm
by crashcourse
why is it everytime I go to log in it says Im already logged in as aTm
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:55 pm
by aTm
where are you trying to log in?
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:09 pm
by innocentbystander
timestamp this aTm....
I am about to watch BC play their 4th game this season, and to no avail. They have no chance at winning a national championship and since winning is all that matters, there is really on 9 teams that people should be enthusiastic about, the 9 that have any shot:
Kentucky
UNC
Duke
UConn
Louisville
Arizona
Michigan State
Florida
Kansas
Its pretty much one of the same 9 (sometime 10) teams that win every year. I keep hoping against hope that maybe someday we'll see a Gonzaga or a Wichita State win one but I think we all know that ain't happening. And forget the Butlers, the VCUs, or the Creighton's of the world, that ain't happening. And its been a long time since we've seen these mid-major division-1 schools like Georgetown or Villanova so I don't think they'll be repeating.
Nope. There are 351 schools. Only 9 count. Fuck the rest.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:15 pm
by aTm
Syracuse and Maryland have won since the last time Arizona or Michigan State did.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:39 pm
by innocentbystander
aTm wrote:Syracuse and Maryland have won since the last time Arizona or Michigan State did.
True. But I am not so sure that they will ever return. And Syracuse had an outstanding year last year.
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:55 pm
by hedge
"Its pretty much one of the same 9 (sometime 10) teams that win every year."
How is that different from football?
Re: Ostensibly Hoops
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 7:06 pm
by innocentbystander
hedge wrote:"Its pretty much one of the same 9 (sometime 10) teams that win every year."
How is that different from football?
The same 9 in football is a much larger percentage. Its about an elite 8% in football instead of the elite 3% in hoops.