Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:56 am
Brian Riedl works for the Heritage Foundation and has an MA in Public affairs; as such, he is a very poor economist
College Hoops, Disrespection, and More
https://goatpen.net/forums/
The stimulus is meant to create economic actively that otherwise would not occur. If the economy is operating at full capacity then a stimulus will not work for the reasons Riedl states, but our economy isn't anywhere near full capacity, businesses are not hiring workers and people are not spending money. We need to do something to change behavior and creating demand for products is the best tool we have.The idea that government spending creates jobs makes sense only if you never ask where the government got the money. It didn’t fall from the sky. The only way Congress can inject spending into the economy is by first taxing or borrowing it out of the economy. No new demand is created; it’s a zero-sum transfer of existing demand.
- Riedl
LMAO. You have repeatedly ignored and dismissed the points of others and you are obviously the kind of person who is intent on believing what you want to believe. Don't be surprised if people begin to ignore you. No hard feelings. You just can't have a conversation with someone for whom facts aren't relevant.Red Bird wrote:Since the question has been ignored, I'll broaden the question to any one of you conservative/Libertarian/Tea party types.Please explain, in detail, how you suppose that we're going to get out of this mess? I'd like to see what your prescription is for ending the great recession because cutting government spending will only put more people out of work and cutting taxes is only going to put us deeper into debt.
Hey, why not? It's free money, right? LOL.Toemeesleather wrote:Create demand, put more money in folks pockets....simply raise the minimum wage to $25/hr.
Done and done.
I don't support Obama on this. Don't support what he's doing in Libya either. I don't see any good coming from any of this.Hacksaw wrote:In other news...
U.S. resumes airstrikes against AQ in Yemen
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/06/ ... ?hpt=hp_t1
I actually support Obama in this, but I am curious where all the libs/dems are who were knocking George W. Bush for sending our military into Iraq and Afghanistan? Hmmm...
I agree with ending the War on Drugs post haste. I don't see how you can legalize "small amounts" cocaine? Perhaps you mean small doses? But yea, we should surrender, we've already lost the war anyway. Taxing pot like cigarettes sounds like a good deal too. I think gambling is already legal in many places. Prostitution? Why not. I wonder what the tax should be?legalize pot, shrums, small amounts of cocaine and tax them.
So you want a fifty -year-old laid off computer programer to take a job picking apples? (I wonder what sort of work you do?)this will reduce government expenses and encourage citizes to accept lower paying jobs that are currently being done by illegal immigrants.
Why not married ones? How bout they simply agree not to have more kids? If they do, cut them off.Unmarried persons on welfare must accept reversable sterilization while on the government dole.
I like it, but how? I mean we'd all like to make America energy independent, but such a program might cost hundreds of billions or even trillions; you willing to raise taxes to pay for that?begin initiative to make America energy independent within 10 years.
Good idea, wish I had suggested this.then start bring our troops home from the mid east.
This is interesting. So you gon'a give them New Jersey? Marin County? Nevada? Maybe they'll take Alaska?tell the jews that if they want a homeland we'll be glad to work out a spot here they can have,
The only reason why pot, cocaine, shrums, etc are illegal, is because we are unable to make cigarettes or alcohol illegal. We tried prohibition and it didn't work. It only created organized crime. But you aren't going to find that much good in alcohol and nothing good about cigarettes. Alcohol and tobacco is death.Red Bird wrote:I agree with ending the War on Drugs post haste. I don't see how you can legalize "small amounts" cocaine? Perhaps you mean small doses? But yea, we should surrender, we've already lost the war anyway. Taxing pot like cigarettes sounds like a good deal too. I think gambling is already legal in many places. Prostitution? Why not. I wonder what the tax should be?legalize pot, shrums, small amounts of cocaine and tax them.
But cutting unemployment in a situation like this would be a disaster.
Illegal immigrants must go home. I don't care who picks our fruit so long as it is harvested legally. If the cost of the fruit is so cheap that it doesn't warrant the labor cost used to harvest it (not enough "profit" in an apple to justify picking it), then I say the fruit should not be picked. Let it rot on the trees. Don't break an immigration law just for cheap food.Red Bird wrote:So you want a fifty -year-old laid off computer programer to take a job picking apples? (I wonder what sort of work you do?)this will reduce government expenses and encourage citizes to accept lower paying jobs that are currently being done by illegal immigrants.
Over at Worldcrossing Nadeshiko said that she wanted all children to be sterilized at birth and only those young people with financial means to raise and support children, only they may have the sterilization reversed. BREEDING to her was a privilege, not a right.Red Bird wrote:Why not married ones? How bout they simply agree not to have more kids? If they do, cut them off.Unmarried persons on welfare must accept reversable sterilization while on the government dole.
Billions, not trillions. Build 200 new nuclear power plants, dump all the waste in Yucca mountain, and tell Harry Reid to go fuck himself. Nevada took all that federal money to tunnel out the mountain and create jobs in Nevada, they must compelled to take all the waste.Red Bird wrote:I like it, but how? I mean we'd all like to make America energy independent, but such a program might cost hundreds of billions or even trillions; you willing to raise taxes to pay for that?begin initiative to make America energy independent within 10 years.
As soon as ISLAM is gone forever, I am okay with this. As long as there is ISLAM then I want 500,000 US troops garrisoned in the Middle East, round the clock, rooting out Fundamentalism. You all forget who we are fighting and why. (Need I go get an image of the WTC smoldering towers?)Red Bird wrote:Good idea, wish I had suggested this.then start bring our troops home from the mid east.
They already have New Jersey and also Long Island. Well, they "share" Jersey and LI with the Roman Catholics the way they share Israel with the Muslims. But Fundamentalist Catholics don't feel compelled to blow themselves up for whatever reason. In fact, Fundamentalist Catholics are pretty harmless.Red Bird wrote:This is interesting. So you gon'a give them New Jersey? Marin County? Nevada? Maybe they'll take Alaska?tell the jews that if they want a homeland we'll be glad to work out a spot here they can have,