Page 75 of 466

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:27 am
by eCat
I've been dogging that show for awhile but the last two episodes have been some great TV.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:48 pm
by BigRedMan
Yeah I think a lot of people were getting upset with it and the writers will hopefully start listening.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 1:13 am
by Saint
yeah, but those guys have buddies who are coming into the bar next. biggest negative for TWD is lack of titties

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 3:54 pm
by hedge
If zombies ever do take over the world, we could sacrifice BRM to them. That would give the humans several generations to repopulate the earth...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 3:55 pm
by hedge
And if we needed a few more years after that, we could give them Stu for dessert...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:38 pm
by BigRedMan
Or would could let them eat you and shoot them after they are tripping on bong resin, smack, crack, and if we miss those I am sure the various V.D. will surely get them.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:38 pm
by BigRedMan
Image

LOL. I said the exact same thing to the wife when I saw that this week. LOL. NOOBS!!

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:33 am
by Bklyn
SNL is going hard on the Lin thing...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 5:17 pm
by aTm
I watched Drive over the weekend. Entertaining movie. I feel like there are some very serious flaws with the way the movie ended though.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 6:28 pm
by Jungle Rat
Image

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:14 am
by Saint
will they ever show April's massive pillow tits or what?

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:44 am
by DooKSucks
They showed "her" rack in Season One, but it was a body double.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:28 am
by Bklyn
So, the question stands.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:44 pm
by Bklyn
Nailed it...The Punanny State

[youtube]464064[/youtube]

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertai ... hts/49010/

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:40 am
by Bklyn
I watched "Black Swan" and enjoyed it. I wasn't blown away, but I thought it was well done. Then I read a review...

http://www.mirrorfilm.org/2011/01/03/bl ... bathrooms/

and I now have a higher appreciation for the film. That's the first time that's happened to me.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:57 am
by hedge
I haven't read the review yet, but my first impression was the same as yours. It was OK and the little twist at the end was pretty good, but otherwise it was pretty much by the numbers, I thought...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:19 am
by hedge
Eh, I pretty much got most of that (maybe not in the same words or depth) when I saw it the first time, but that was a good review. Darren Aronofsky is a good director, maybe great, but I thought Black Swan was more or less a female version (with a few other non-gender specific twists) of The Wrestler, which he had done a few years earlier. Not that The Wrestler was a bad film. I liked it. But I wouldn't put it (or Black Swan) up there with Apocalypse Now or anything. I liked some of Aronofsky's earlier films better. Pi and particularly Requiem for a Dream. They're all about people dealing with personal "issues" and even depravity to varying degrees, but none better and more brutally than Requiem for a Dream. If you haven't seen that one, go get it...

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:02 pm
by Bklyn
I couldn't get into Requiem...maybe I should give it another look. I think I graded it harder when I originally saw it because I had a personal beef with someone involved in the film. That colored my perspective, I think.

I never did see The Wrestler, but I meant to. Maybe I'll throw that in, as well.

I have to admit, I caught many of the subtleties Aronofsky threw in, but I did not capture all of them...and I did not spend a lot of time thinking about the depth of the girl's psychosis and what that meant when I first watched it. So, reading the review made me spend a bit more quiet time thinking about those things and made me appreciate the film a little more...especially enough to say I can see why it got the acclaim it did last year.

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:17 pm
by eCat
I felt that way about Anal Housewives 3

Re: UCLA Bruins

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:18 pm
by BigRedMan
eCat wrote:I felt that way about Anal Housewives 3
I am sure that if you haven't seen the first 2, then you might be lost on this one. I've heard the plot is as complicated as Chinese Alegbra.