Hizzy III wrote: The last true non-evangelical that we had in Austin was Ann Richards, and she had an affinity for the drink, which wouldn't be bad if you didn't also include her affinity for drinking and driving.
Hey, it worked for the Kennedy's.
Moderators: eCat, hedge, Cletus
Hizzy III wrote: The last true non-evangelical that we had in Austin was Ann Richards, and she had an affinity for the drink, which wouldn't be bad if you didn't also include her affinity for drinking and driving.
Saint wrote:"So technically , while he is an enemy combatant, we targeted an American citizen for termination."
you say this like it's unprecedented
oh I thought you meant recently. Read the story on the Bonus Army - that will really piss you off. MacArthur and Patton running down WWI veterans on public lands.Saint wrote:I would be extremely surprised if it hadn't, esp. during the civil war. besides, these 2 pretty much decided they were at war vs. the USA, so civil liberties go out the window when you take up with a sworn enemy. at least that's how I see it.
our fore fathers were armed insurgents at one time - I suspect that played a big role in them creating the 5th amendment.AlabamAlum wrote:I would think leaving your country to head a group of armed insurgents intent on bringing war, death, destruction (whatever) to your (former) country would be enough to have your citizenship revoked. If it's not, it should be, imo.
I don't think this is the case. You have committed treason however. I don't think it would have been too hard to get a trial in abstentia on him. I need to look up the whole legality of Wanted Dead of Alive posters.However, when you leave your country and take up arms against her, you have in an a very overt way, renounced your citizenship, IMO.
Actually, I wasn't sure. I should have said, I don't think that is the case, but I am not sure. I spoke to a former Asst Attorney General about this. We've alleged that American citizens were enemy combatants since the Civil War. There are specific ways to renounce your citizenship. Whether or not Al-Awlaki did this to satisfy the law, I dont' know. Either way, as a treasoness American citizen or an ex-American citizen who declared war on the U.S., classifying him as an enemy combatant is probably okay. And in an active war footing, one doesn't need to get a court order when an enemy combatant is in your sights.AlabamAlum wrote:Spacer,
Well, I ended it with an "in my opinion" - I'm saying if that's not current law, it should be. Surely, it is reasonable to revoke the citizenship of someone who leaves their country and takes up arms and orchestrates attacks?
He had dual Yemeni-US citizenship. Al-Awlaki left the US, went to Yemen at the age of 8 and became involved in al-Qaida operations to wage war on the US.
Obama put him on this CIA kill list last year and I support his decision.