Page 682 of 1476

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:08 am
by Toemeesleather
bluetick wrote:I missed the part where the jury agreed that the case shouldn't have gone to trial.

Nobody said that.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:28 am
by hedge
You said that the jury agreed that it shouldn't even have gone to the grand jury (not sure how you deduced that based on a not guilty trial verdict), which in fact would mean that they agreed that it shouldn't have gone to trial. So actually, you did say that. Why did you lie, Toe?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:32 am
by Toemeesleather
Yep, stoopid local yokels said not enough evidence to give to a grand jury..


For those w/reading impairments. "local yokels" in this case is the Seminole Co. detectives/sheriff/district attorney.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:51 am
by Jungle Rat
Obviously the "Local yokels" got it right because that case should have never been heard.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:55 am
by Toemeesleather
Even rat understands simple English....too bad for Hedge.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:04 pm
by bluetick
Toemeesleather wrote:Yep, stoopid local yokels said not enough evidence to give to a grand jury....//...turns out a jury agreed w/the local yokels.
You said the po-po/DA said there wasn't enough evidence to go in front of a grand jury, and then ended by saying the jury also agreed there wasn't enough evidence to give to a grand jury. Obviously your sentence structure and word usage didn't match your intended point - that neither group thought GZ was guilty.

I have no problem with the verdict. It appeared that since the jury asked for the possibility of lighter charges they might go that way.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:15 pm
by Toemeesleather
Sentence structure not taught at trade school.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:41 pm
by Toemeesleather
Yet another reason to ignore ESPN...

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/more_spo ... IShURrvUGO

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:51 pm
by hedge
Toemeesleather wrote:
bluetick wrote:I missed the part where the jury agreed that the case shouldn't have gone to trial.

Nobody said that.
"turns out a jury agreed w/the local yokels."

Why did you lie, Toe?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:31 pm
by Toemeesleather
Not just stupid, boringly stupid.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:12 pm
by Owlman
Toemeesleather wrote:Yet another reason to ignore ESPN...

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/more_spo ... IShURrvUGO
oh yeah. Try to be a sports fan of the 3 biggest sports in the U.S. and ignore ESPN. Don't believe it.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:40 pm
by Jungle Rat
Haven't watched ESPN for over a year now. If I do check in its at 50 past the hour for the top plays. Besides that I have no interest in the Yankees, Red Sox or Lakers.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:57 pm
by AugustWest
Fuck ESPN. If they are not actually showing a game I don't watch 'em.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:23 pm
by Dr. Strangelove
Sportcenter stopped being worthwhile sometime around 2000. Whenever more time became devoted to imbecile opinions and "analysis" instead of showing actual highlights.

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:41 pm
by Jungle Rat
Sorta like MTV

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:32 am
by Owlman
Jungle Rat wrote:Haven't watched ESPN for over a year now. If I do check in its at 50 past the hour for the top plays. Besides that I have no interest in the Yankees, Red Sox or Lakers.
Bengals weren't on MNF last year?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:36 am
by Toemeesleather
I admit I'll watch some college football, but only with the sound turned down....when did it become mandatory to fill every available second on air with worthless listen to me, I'm an expert drivel?

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:26 am
by bluetick
Obamacare Set to Cut New Yorker's Individual Med Plans by 53% - NY Daily News

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politic ... -1.1401704

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:06 am
by hedge
"when did it become mandatory to fill every available second on air with worthless listen to me, I'm an expert drivel?"

I see you stole your posting style from ESPN...

Re: Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:42 pm
by bluetick
Dow, S&P Hit Records as Earnings Roll Out - Reuters

Pew Research Poll: US Still Seen as the Top Economic Power - AP

US Economy Grew in May and June, Bolstered by Housing Recovery, Consumers, and Increased Factory Output - Federal Reserve Beige Book Survey