Re: Florida State Seminoles
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:58 pm
A flip phone? Dear lord...do you churn your own butter, too?
College Hoops, Disrespection, and More
https://goatpen.net/forums/
From the post a couple days back of my 5 questions regarding this SCOTUS fuckery, this is one of the answers I did know...eCat wrote: a president handing out executive orders to bypass congress doesn't get much sympathy when they try to shut him down
Bklyn wrote:This is kinda hilarious...
3. How does Obama stack up with the number Executive Orders issued versus the last 5 Presidents? How have any of those presidents fared when trying to get nominations on the SCOTUS bench...?
Ya'll is the colloquial version of y'all...AlabamAlum wrote:Yes. "Vittles" is a colloquial version of victuals.
Older operating system phones running less secure ecryption that Apple could always break. The FBI is pissed now that the phones have good encryption, and they want to force Apple to create a new way to be able to break in like they used to.crashcourse wrote:I had read apple cooperated on roughly 70 other cases before deciding not to allow access on the san bernadino shooters.
fact is it has been going on for years
the one isis linked shooting we have and apple decides to make a stand now
What the government as a whole cares about is not rooted in actually believing the shit they actually do. It's all about "optics" from the perspective of who is in power. We shouldn't give them the "keys" to anything, because the winds will change based on the whims of individuals and political parties who end up in positions of power.Fearing a civil liberties backlash and "bad public relations" for the Obama administration, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson refused in early 2014 to end the secret U.S. policy that prohibited immigration officials from reviewing the social media messages of all foreign citizens applying for U.S. visas, according to a former senior department official.
...
"It was primarily a question of optics," said Cohen. "There were concerns from a privacy and civil liberties perspective that while this was not illegal, that it would be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly."
The key is not the amount, but in the seriousness of those orders. Improving the Coordination and Effectiveness of Youth Programs is a little less weighty than allowing illegals to stay in the country.Bklyn wrote:From the post a couple days back of my 5 questions regarding this SCOTUS fuckery, this is one of the answers I did know...eCat wrote: a president handing out executive orders to bypass congress doesn't get much sympathy when they try to shut him down
Bklyn wrote:This is kinda hilarious...
3. How does Obama stack up with the number Executive Orders issued versus the last 5 Presidents? How have any of those presidents fared when trying to get nominations on the SCOTUS bench...?
Dammit, sardis. Now, you're challenging me to categorize the types of Executive Orders signed by all Presidents from Reagan forward...sardis wrote: The key is not the amount, but in the seriousness of those orders. Improving the Coordination and Effectiveness of Youth Programs is a little less weighty than allowing illegals to stay in the country.