Page 68 of 331

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:17 pm
by Jungle Rat
He talked about that site too.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:27 pm
by hedge
I think you misread. He said NewEgg, not NewFagg...

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:44 pm
by crashcourse
I have the ipad
have all that stuff on the xoomi but paid 429 4g so I could roam with AT&T--original ipad was 399 but we wanted ability of internet in car. --thats 14 dollars a month.--have maybe 4 apps I pruchased for less then 10 buck--gps traffic/live sattelite/couple of games/police scanner/

so yeah i paid more but I have ipod/and apple computer etc so might as well have them all interface

still have blackberry phone but rarely need phone apps except to text and google occasional updates sports scoes. and the occasional picture i guess

have the kendal too--use it mostly for reading apps. probalby redundant but the kids chipped in and got it for me for christmas so I use it

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:49 pm
by T Dot O Dot
I don't have apple anything, eff 'em.

my sister on the other hand will buy anything that is prefixed with "I"

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:51 pm
by Jungle Rat
Ipenis?

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:58 pm
by T Dot O Dot
LOL

I'm going to use that

she ran up her internet usage overage fees one month because she wanted to stream ALL of her TV off of her new IPAD, she has 3 flat screen HD tv's at her disposal, the smallest being 42", all with DVR's

unbelievable

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:24 pm
by aTm
grandfathered at&t unlimited plan ftw

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:17 am
by DooKSucks
E, you will hate the Samsungs. They can do all sorts of things, but the suck at being an actual phone (the reception blows) and the batteries aren't worth a flying fuck. They SIII supposedly "fixed" all of the glitches you had in the Galaxy S (which I have) and the SII, but the SIII still has shit reception and eats up battery despite how hard you work to keep non-used apps turned off. My boss traded in for the SIII (the rest of the office is stuck with the S) to try it out and see if things improved. He still hates it. I think he is going to go with iPhones next if Lexis will make TimeMatters compatible with it, but who knows if Lexis will get their shit together on TimeMatters. I hate that damn software with a passion.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:19 am
by Jungle Rat
Been posting on a Samsung for years now. The phone has been great, Verizon not so much. Great screen.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:28 am
by Dave23
aTm wrote:grandfathered at&t unlimited plan ftw
Word...

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:41 am
by hedge
I'm still on my grandfathered AllTel contract, still using a flip phone and don't have any complaints...

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:37 am
by eCat
I really don't have a problem with the iPhone, but I just think we're at the point where Droid does everything the iPhone does.

We are grandfathered on AT&T. To add my kids onto it is going to cost us $20 apiece to give them 300mb of data, which is nothing. Not sure what I'm going to do there.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:47 am
by Jungle Rat
Im grandfathered in via Verizon but my oldests iphone isn't. Those data charges rack up quickly for a teenager. Her first month alone she went $30 over. I've got it set now that once she hits her limit it only wi-fi for the rest of the billing period. Of course they never told me that I could do that when I bought it. Data plans are a scam.

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:00 pm
by hedge
I talked to some dude at Time Warner for almost an hour yesterday, trying to get them to bring me another modem so I could hook up the second wireless network. He tried everything to get me to go wireless with them, i.e., pay a monthly fee for their wireless router (already paying $2.50 a month for their modem), but at $10 a month extra, I don't think it's worth it. I am going to skin this cat yet, my way. MY WAY, BY GOD!!

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:02 pm
by eCat
hedge wrote:I talked to some dude at Time Warner for almost an hour yesterday, trying to get them to bring me another modem so I could hook up the second wireless network. He tried everything to get me to go wireless with them, i.e., pay a monthly fee for their wireless router (already paying $2.50 a month for their modem), but at $10 a month extra, I don't think it's worth it. I am going to skin this cat yet, my way. MY WAY, BY GOD!!

you can buy a wireless router for $19

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:09 pm
by hedge
But it has to go thru a modem...

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:11 pm
by eCat
hedge wrote:But it has to go thru a modem...

well yea, so does everyone elses in America that has internet thru a cable company

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:15 pm
by BigRedMan
You are still dealing with this? NUT UP SON!!

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:18 pm
by hedge
Also, when I got that last wireless router, it had a disc with it that I put into desktop computer (that it was running thru), but if I set up this second router, it's not going to be hooked up to a computer, it's just going to be sitting there. Or was I supposed to run the disc on the laptops that will be picking up the signal from the router?

Re: MIT Engineers

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:21 pm
by BigRedMan
GOD DAMN IT. Buy the thing I linked to you and you won't have to mess with that silly shit.