The Goat Pen

Mrs. Donald looked better "before"...

Hillary in that pic looks like the Joker's sister.

I could be wrong but I think this election for POTUS could be a chance for a strong third party candidate to make some noise. Now it would have to be someone that could appease to both sides but if that person could get a solid running candidate, I think they could have a shot especially if the choices are Clinton / Bush. Not sure who would be the choice but if ever the time was going to happen, it could be soon.

from a voter standpoint they would but the two parties wouldn't let it get off the ground

If you get a moderate, reasonable, well-capitalized person who is willing and able to spend some absurd amount of his own money - $3-5 billion - then a third party has a shot. I'm not sure that guy exists.

Cletus wrote:If you get a moderate, reasonable, well-capitalized person who is willing and able to spend some absurd amount of his own money - $3-5 billion - then a third party has a shot. I'm not sure that guy exists.

I figure Trump is going to pull a Perot - at the first indication he has no shot, he'll have some reason to drop out that isn't "I'm going to lose" but "its an unfortunate situation and I have no choice to but to focus my energy on this instead of my presidential run"

but until then, I'm loving every second of him in the race.

The only way Trump wins is if he guarantees every voter a million dollars. Side Show Bob had better hair. In fact, I think Bob should be Hedges next user pic. If his dumbass can figure it out. After all, he is a clown.

eCat wrote:

Cletus wrote:If you get a moderate, reasonable, well-capitalized person who is willing and able to spend some absurd amount of his own money - $3-5 billion - then a third party has a shot. I'm not sure that guy exists.

I figure Trump is going to pull a Perot - at the first indication he has no shot, he'll have some reason to drop out that isn't "I'm going to lose" but "its an unfortunate situation and I have no choice to but to focus my energy on this instead of my presidential run"

but until then, I'm loving every second of him in the race.

of course you love it. its fun. he's infinitely more interesting that Caitlyn Jenner or any his his/her step daughters

We'll see how this goes...

http://www.wdrb.com/story/29650818/hill ... to-privacy

sardis wrote:We'll see how this goes...

http://www.wdrb.com/story/29650818/hill ... to-privacy

I think he wins his case

He should.

I am glad you two are legal experts...

DooKSucks wrote:I am glad you two are legal experts...

We are not. Tell us counselor, does he win the case?

Not a lawyer, but if you think someone is spying on you, whether it's a drone, binoculars, leering out the window at eCats wife, or whatever...a little advice don't grab a gun to settle things and think you're justified. You're probably a fucking moron.

Cletus wrote:If you get a moderate, reasonable, well-capitalized person who is willing and able to spend some absurd amount of his own money - $3-5 billion - then a third party has a shot. I'm not sure that guy exists.

I believe Michael Bloomberg is worth 40B. He's socially liberal and fiscally conservative which kinda makes him a moderate (although radicals left and right would likely disagree). He comes across as reasonable imo.

I think at the very least he'd have a shot.

aTm wrote:Not a lawyer, but if you think someone is spying on you, whether it's a drone, binoculars, leering out the window at eCats wife, or whatever...a little advice don't grab a gun to settle things and think you're justified. You're probably a fucking moron.

You know what I think is moronic? Equating a human being with binoculars watching you to a drone flying over your property. You can shoot one of those things and know that a jury is not bloody likely to convict you of.... anything. Guess which one aTm? Of course, I'm not a lawyer.

bluetick wrote:

Cletus wrote:If you get a moderate, reasonable, well-capitalized person who is willing and able to spend some absurd amount of his own money - $3-5 billion - then a third party has a shot. I'm not sure that guy exists.

I believe Michael Bloomberg is worth 40B. He's socially liberal and fiscally conservative which kinda makes him a moderate (although radicals left and right would likely disagree). He comes across as reasonable imo.

I think at the very least he'd have a shot.

Maybe. But we'll never know about Bloomberg. We might know about Trump.

Of course we know about Trump. He's a nutjob. Reminds me of Ross Perot.

innocentbystander wrote:

aTm wrote:Not a lawyer, but if you think someone is spying on you, whether it's a drone, binoculars, leering out the window at eCats wife, or whatever...a little advice don't grab a gun to settle things and think you're justified. You're probably a fucking moron.

You know what I think is moronic? Equating a human being with binoculars watching you to a drone flying over your property. You can shoot one of those things and know that a jury is not bloody likely to convict you of.... anything. Guess which one aTm? Of course, I'm not a lawyer.

Hope it happens to you then.

aTm wrote:

innocentbystander wrote:

aTm wrote:Not a lawyer, but if you think someone is spying on you, whether it's a drone, binoculars, leering out the window at eCats wife, or whatever...a little advice don't grab a gun to settle things and think you're justified. You're probably a fucking moron.

You know what I think is moronic? Equating a human being with binoculars watching you to a drone flying over your property. You can shoot one of those things and know that a jury is not bloody likely to convict you of.... anything. Guess which one aTm? Of course, I'm not a lawyer.

Hope it happens to you then.

I don't own a drone, binoculars,... or a gun.