Puterbac News Network and Political Discussion Thread

[bluetick]

Aight. Shoulda said "all white guys except for one weepy orange guy."

[Professor Tiger]

Boehner = the world's saddest tangerine.

[Toemeesleather]

Fair and balanced, seems a pair has been grown by a member of the MSM.


Journalist Bob Woodward on Wednesday criticized Barack Obama's handling of the automatic U.S. budget cuts set to take effect this week, calling the president's decision to hold back on military deployments "madness."

His comments continued what has become a running dispute between Woodward, perhaps the country's best-known print journalist, and the Democratic White House over who is responsible for the across-the-board cuts scheduled to begin on Friday.

Last week, Woodward published an opinion piece in the Washington Post - where he is an associate editor - saying the administration was "wrong" to blame the cuts on Republicans.

[bluetick]

If you ask me Woodword's pair has shrunk to the size of raisins. Some desk jockey at the WH told him he'd regret seeing the 'trees instead of the forest' wrt his sequestrastion article - so BW is claiming oprama threatened him.

Redford should let him know what a pussy move that was.

[Toemeesleather]

Tick changes the subject....shocker....Woodward is the first lib journalist to publicly say the king has no clothes/moved the goalposts/obfuscates, which most sane people have known for years...soooo change the subject, make it some personal thing between Woodward and a WH talking head.

[Toemeesleather]

Just like Benghazi, pay no attention to the facts, dead Americans???? What about that video?.... this is our story.....

"I get emails like this almost every hour, whether it's from the White House or Capitol Hill," said Chuck Todd, the NBC News political director and senior White House correspondent. "For better or worse, flacks get paid to push back."

[Professor Tiger]

I woke up this morning and saw that the world is still in place. Sequestration = Mayan calendar doomsday.

[Toemeesleather]

I remember the death/destruction/crashes/famine that occurred when Reagan fired the PATCO union.....terrible.

[Professor Tiger]

This is what the sequestration was supposed to look like:

[youtube]grbSQ6O6kbs[/youtube]

[sardis]

Ok, I guess now since we are in it, it is not apocolyptic...

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100510814

[Toemeesleather]

From "shutting down air craft carriers...layoffs....airport delays....compromising national security....no food inspections.......to....

"This is not going to be an apocalypse I think, as some people said.


This nihilist is so out of touch w/reality.

[Jungle Rat]

I think its more you.

[Professor Tiger]

Here is the big picture of the sequestration: the American government is FINALLY doing SOMETHING to address the deficit. It is a tiny cut (or, more accurately, a decrease in the rate of increase) in federal spending. It should be much larger to make any real difference, but it is still a milestone - a step towards fiscal sanity not seen since the Clinton administration. The world markets now have more confidence in us than they would have if we had kicked the can down the road, like we always do.

[Big Orange Junky]

Congrats BOJ - you have settled the non-issue of what constitutes an abandoned vehicle and when a property owner can take possesion of said vehicle. Which - naturally - nothing to do with guns in trunks.

No as per usual you try to change the subject. You said cars were NOT private property. They absolutely positively ARE as the links showed, heck the Supreme Court of the United States says cars are private property. As a matter of fact you insinuated that it was absurd to think that your car was your own personal private property. I bet you wouldn't say that if some democratic congressman was busted with illegal drugs in the car and the car was searched without probable cause or court order.

The link demonstrates that cars indeed are private property of the owner which then validates the fact that the "guns in trunks" bill just reiterates and reinforces the private property rights of BOTH. The landowner can either allow you to park your car or not, but can not tell you what you can have in said private property. You can leave your gun in your car or not, but you can NOT take it out of your private property.

It does not "protect" the individual from being fired if this goes against company policy and the boss finds out, but if you keep it in your car, the only place you are allowed to, then he/she won't know.

[sardis]

This is awesom news. Tick can keep buying his suburbans for another 100 years...

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100513916

[Professor Tiger]

That IS great news for somebody out there, but the price of gas has been going up steadily during this boom in supply, and probably will for the foreseeable future.

[sardis]

Bush and the oil companies are behind this over inflation of gasoline prices...

[sardis]

Janet Napolitano screams airport delays...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... 4-08-39-18

When there are none...

http://www.fly.faa.gov/flyfaa/usmap.jsp

[Toemeesleather]

shocking

[gule]

someone should take Janet "Napoleon" and her lezbo followers to the Arizona desert and have a little target practice....