Page 7 of 13
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:44 pm
by innocentbystander
hedge wrote:Just like you appear to be Auggie's bitch right now...
hedge,
notre dame means nothing to you. don't act like it does. why don't you just focus on the gamecocks? that is ALL you should be concerned with right now (from a college football perspective.)
I am sick and fucking tired of our ACC teams getting their collective clocks absolutely cleaned by the SEC, year after year.
Sick. Of. It. every year, same story, the SEC kicks our nutsacks so far up into our innerds, we can taste our own testicles
you get on the horn, call everyone in Tar Heel nation and you tell them WIN THAT FUCKING GAME. i don't want to hear anymore excuses
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:01 pm
by dave_rickart
or BC could schedule some SEC teams, and go beat them....
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:56 pm
by innocentbystander
dave_rickart wrote:or BC could schedule some SEC teams, and go beat them....
they want 2-for-1 from us. and they want the one home game to be at Foxborough.
we are never going to give that to anyone anymore. Fuck 'em. BC isn't hamstrung the way it used to be when they were independant
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:24 pm
by Jungle Rat
Sure they are.
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:30 am
by dave_rickart
"BC isn't hamstrung the way it used to be when they were independent...."
gee, that explains why their OOC has included Kent, Army, UMass, Weber State, Central Florida, Northeastern, Central Michigan, Rhode Island, Bowling Green and Maine the past few years....
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:55 am
by hedge
Maine is good!
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:45 pm
by innocentbystander
dave_rickart wrote:"BC isn't hamstrung the way it used to be when they were independent...."
gee, that explains why their OOC has included Kent, Army, UMass, Weber State, Central Florida, Northeastern, Central Michigan, Rhode Island, Bowling Green and Maine the past few years....
We have our Maine and UMass. You guys have your Richmond. So what?
We are not going to cut a deal with a SEC team that means 1 game at BC for 2 at Tenn/South Carolina/Georgia/Alabama/whatever. BC used to do that but we don't do that anymore. So (unless we can cut more of those remarkable Ohio State 1-for-1 deals) we are stuck with that shitty OOC schedule.
By the by, we are @ USC this year. I'll be at the game. I'll watch our team of 2-star players (who shouldn't have gotten BCS schollies) get our asses kicked by their team of 5-stars.
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:37 pm
by dave_rickart
"We have our Maine and UMass."
and your Kent and your Army and your Weber State and your Northeastern and your Rhode Island....
you have a shitty OOC schedule because you schedule a shitty OOC
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:04 pm
by hedge
They schedule shitty!!
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:05 pm
by hedge
You can read that "schedule" as either a noun or a verb. Or both...
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 5:02 pm
by innocentbystander
hedge wrote:You can read that "schedule" as either a noun or a verb. Or both...
read it anyway you want.
but you and I (and everyone) know exactly what I mean when I said it
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:29 pm
by Jungle Rat
And Im betting they looked at you like you were having a stroke.
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:52 am
by hedge
"read it anyway you want.
but you and I (and everyone) know exactly what I mean when I said it"
I don't think you know what you meant. I damn sure didn't. Which leads to the question: Why did you lie, IB?
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:39 pm
by 10ac
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:29 pm
by AugustWest
Maybe in the "college football" thread, where it's relevant as opposed to the ACc thread where it's not.
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 7:43 pm
by 10ac
It's in the "College Football" forum. There's no general football discussion thread here and it happened in North Carolina so it's apropos.
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 8:54 pm
by AugustWest
It's in the "College Football" forum
which is where this belongs. If this had happened between florida A&M and Georgia St would you have posted this in the SEC forum?
not worth bitching about. just curious.
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:52 pm
by KeviNole
Hopefully the Nole defense will be extra inspired this Saturday by the All ACC team selections.
Duke had 3 first team defensive players, and FSU had one? Do the writers seriously watch the games or just look at the stat lines (where our players usually play just over one half)? Our secondary is ridiculously good but the first team All ACC team is half Dukies - LMAO! Wonder if there will be any reconsideration after Winston puts up 400+ yards and Duke puts up 200 yards passing.
That's a complete joke - I get that you can't have all the players from one team but still...
And our kicker will likely win (and deservedly so) the Groza award, but Freese gets the lifetime achievement award? Aguayo has missed ONE kick all year, and has singlehandedly outscored our opponents.
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:21 pm
by AugustWest
Are you just now figuring out that the ACC likes teams that wear blue?
Re: ACC - Conference Discussion
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:36 am
by KeviNole
On the bright side, this proves how great our DC (Jeremy Pruitt is).
Duke had three first team All-ACC selections and FSU had one....therefore we produced a better defense with less talent amirite?